提交 670f5fe3 编写于 作者: L Linus Torvalds 提交者: Junio C Hamano

[PATCH] Fix bisection terminating condition

When testing bisection and using gitk to visualize the result, it was
obvious that the termination condition was broken.

We know what the bad entry is only when the bisection ends up telling us
to test the known-bad entry again.

Also, add a safety net: if somebody marks as good something that includes
the known-bad point, we now notice and complain, instead of writing an
empty revision to the new bisection branch.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
上级 61f01a5b
......@@ -105,12 +105,16 @@ bisect_next() {
good=$(git-rev-parse --sq --revs-only --not \
$(cd "$GIT_DIR" && ls refs/bisect/good-*)) &&
rev=$(eval "git-rev-list --bisect $good $bad") || exit
nr=$(eval "git-rev-list $rev $good" | wc -l) || exit
if [ "$nr" -le "1" ]; then
if [ -z "$rev" ]; then
echo "$bad was both good and bad"
exit 1
fi
if [ "$rev" = "$bad" ]; then
echo "$rev is first bad commit"
git-diff-tree --pretty $rev
exit 0
fi
nr=$(eval "git-rev-list $rev $good" | wc -l) || exit
echo "Bisecting: $nr revisions left to test after this"
echo "$rev" > "$GIT_DIR/refs/heads/new-bisect"
git checkout new-bisect || exit
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册