write_locked_index(): add flag to avoid writing unchanged index
We have several callers like if (active_cache_changed && write_locked_index(...)) handle_error(); rollback_lock_file(...); where the final rollback is needed because "!active_cache_changed" shortcuts the if-expression. There are also a few variants of this, including some if-else constructs that make it more clear when the explicit rollback is really needed. Teach `write_locked_index()` to take a new flag SKIP_IF_UNCHANGED and simplify the callers. Leave the most complicated of the callers (in builtin/update-index.c) unchanged. Rewriting it to use this new flag would end up duplicating logic. We could have made the new flag behave the other way round ("FORCE_WRITE"), but that could break existing users behind their backs. Let's take the more conservative approach. We can still migrate existing callers to use our new flag. Later we might even be able to flip the default, possibly without entirely ignoring the risk to in-flight or out-of-tree topics. Suggested-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NMartin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录