提交 5baf37d3 编写于 作者: M Michael Haggerty 提交者: Junio C Hamano

verify_refname_available(): rename function

Rename is_refname_available() to verify_refname_available() and change
its return value from 1 for success to 0 for success, to be consistent
with our error-handling convention. In a moment it will also get a
"struct strbuf *err" parameter.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
上级 e911104c
......@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ struct ref_dir {
* presence of an empty subdirectory does not block the creation of a
* similarly-named reference. (The fact that reference names with the
* same leading components can conflict *with each other* is a
* separate issue that is regulated by is_refname_available().)
* separate issue that is regulated by verify_refname_available().)
*
* Please note that the name field contains the fully-qualified
* reference (or subdirectory) name. Space could be saved by only
......@@ -858,13 +858,14 @@ static int nonmatching_ref_fn(struct ref_entry *entry, void *vdata)
}
/*
* Return true iff a reference named refname could be created without
* conflicting with the name of an existing reference in dir. If
* extras is non-NULL, it is a list of additional refnames with which
* refname is not allowed to conflict. If skip is non-NULL, ignore
* potential conflicts with refs in skip (e.g., because they are
* scheduled for deletion in the same operation). Behavior is
* undefined if the same name is listed in both extras and skip.
* Return 0 if a reference named refname could be created without
* conflicting with the name of an existing reference in dir.
* Otherwise, return a negative value. If extras is non-NULL, it is a
* list of additional refnames with which refname is not allowed to
* conflict. If skip is non-NULL, ignore potential conflicts with refs
* in skip (e.g., because they are scheduled for deletion in the same
* operation). Behavior is undefined if the same name is listed in
* both extras and skip.
*
* Two reference names conflict if one of them exactly matches the
* leading components of the other; e.g., "refs/foo/bar" conflicts
......@@ -873,15 +874,15 @@ static int nonmatching_ref_fn(struct ref_entry *entry, void *vdata)
*
* extras and skip must be sorted.
*/
static int is_refname_available(const char *refname,
const struct string_list *extras,
const struct string_list *skip,
struct ref_dir *dir)
static int verify_refname_available(const char *refname,
const struct string_list *extras,
const struct string_list *skip,
struct ref_dir *dir)
{
const char *slash;
int pos;
struct strbuf dirname = STRBUF_INIT;
int ret = 0;
int ret = -1;
/*
* For the sake of comments in this function, suppose that
......@@ -1007,7 +1008,7 @@ static int is_refname_available(const char *refname,
}
/* No conflicts were found */
ret = 1;
ret = 0;
cleanup:
strbuf_release(&dirname);
......@@ -2383,7 +2384,7 @@ static struct ref_lock *lock_ref_sha1_basic(const char *refname,
* our refname.
*/
if (is_null_sha1(lock->old_sha1) &&
!is_refname_available(refname, extras, skip, get_packed_refs(&ref_cache))) {
verify_refname_available(refname, extras, skip, get_packed_refs(&ref_cache))) {
last_errno = ENOTDIR;
goto error_return;
}
......@@ -2824,8 +2825,10 @@ static int rename_ref_available(const char *oldname, const char *newname)
int ret;
string_list_insert(&skip, oldname);
ret = is_refname_available(newname, NULL, &skip, get_packed_refs(&ref_cache))
&& is_refname_available(newname, NULL, &skip, get_loose_refs(&ref_cache));
ret = !verify_refname_available(newname, NULL, &skip,
get_packed_refs(&ref_cache))
&& !verify_refname_available(newname, NULL, &skip,
get_loose_refs(&ref_cache));
string_list_clear(&skip, 0);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册