提交 25fba78d 编写于 作者: J Jeff King 提交者: Junio C Hamano

cat-file: disable object/refname ambiguity check for batch mode

A common use of "cat-file --batch-check" is to feed a list
of objects from "rev-list --objects" or a similar command.
In this instance, all of our input objects are 40-byte sha1
ids. However, cat-file has always allowed arbitrary revision
specifiers, and feeds the result to get_sha1().

Fortunately, get_sha1() recognizes a 40-byte sha1 before
doing any hard work trying to look up refs, meaning this
scenario should end up spending very little time converting
the input into an object sha1. However, since 798c35fc
(get_sha1: warn about full or short object names that look
like refs, 2013-05-29), when we encounter this case, we
spend the extra effort to do a refname lookup anyway, just
to print a warning. This is further exacerbated by ca919930
(get_packed_ref_cache: reload packed-refs file when it
changes, 2013-06-20), which makes individual ref lookup more
expensive by requiring a stat() of the packed-refs file for
each missing ref.

With no patches, this is the time it takes to run:

  $ git rev-list --objects --all >objects
  $ time git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectname)' <objects

on the linux.git repository:

  real    1m13.494s
  user    0m25.924s
  sys     0m47.532s

If we revert ca919930, the packed-refs up-to-date check, it
gets a little better:

  real    0m54.697s
  user    0m21.692s
  sys     0m32.916s

but we are still spending quite a bit of time on ref lookup
(and we would not want to revert that patch, anyway, which
has correctness issues).  If we revert 798c35fc, disabling
the warning entirely, we get a much more reasonable time:

  real    0m7.452s
  user    0m6.836s
  sys     0m0.608s

This patch does the moral equivalent of this final case (and
gets similar speedups). We introduce a global flag that
callers of get_sha1() can use to avoid paying the price for
the warning.
Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
上级 ee6e5843
......@@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ static int batch_objects(struct batch_options *opt)
strbuf_expand(&buf, opt->format, expand_format, &data);
data.mark_query = 0;
/*
* We are going to call get_sha1 on a potentially very large number of
* objects. In most large cases, these will be actual object sha1s. The
* cost to double-check that each one is not also a ref (just so we can
* warn) ends up dwarfing the actual cost of the object lookups
* themselves. We can work around it by just turning off the warning.
*/
warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity = 0;
while (strbuf_getline(&buf, stdin, '\n') != EOF) {
char *p;
int error;
......
......@@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ extern int assume_unchanged;
extern int prefer_symlink_refs;
extern int log_all_ref_updates;
extern int warn_ambiguous_refs;
extern int warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity;
extern int shared_repository;
extern const char *apply_default_whitespace;
extern const char *apply_default_ignorewhitespace;
......
......@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ int prefer_symlink_refs;
int is_bare_repository_cfg = -1; /* unspecified */
int log_all_ref_updates = -1; /* unspecified */
int warn_ambiguous_refs = 1;
int warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity = 1;
int repository_format_version;
const char *git_commit_encoding;
const char *git_log_output_encoding;
......
......@@ -451,13 +451,15 @@ static int get_sha1_basic(const char *str, int len, unsigned char *sha1)
int at, reflog_len;
if (len == 40 && !get_sha1_hex(str, sha1)) {
refs_found = dwim_ref(str, len, tmp_sha1, &real_ref);
if (refs_found > 0 && warn_ambiguous_refs) {
warning(warn_msg, len, str);
if (advice_object_name_warning)
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", _(object_name_msg));
if (warn_on_object_refname_ambiguity) {
refs_found = dwim_ref(str, len, tmp_sha1, &real_ref);
if (refs_found > 0 && warn_ambiguous_refs) {
warning(warn_msg, len, str);
if (advice_object_name_warning)
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", _(object_name_msg));
}
free(real_ref);
}
free(real_ref);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册