-
由 Jeff King 提交于
In a triangular workflow, the place you pull from and the place you push to may be different. As we have branch_get_upstream for the former, this patch adds branch_get_push for the latter (and as the former implements @{upstream}, so will this implement @{push} in a future patch). Note that the memory-handling for the return value bears some explanation. Some code paths require allocating a new string, and some let us return an existing string. We should provide a consistent interface to the caller, so it knows whether to free the result or not. We could do so by xstrdup-ing any existing strings, and having the caller always free. But that makes us inconsistent with branch_get_upstream, so we would prefer to simply take ownership of the resulting string. We do so by storing it inside the "struct branch", just as we do with the upstream refname (in that case we compute it when the branch is created, but there's no reason not to just fill it in lazily in this case). Signed-off-by: NJeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: NJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
e291c75a