TCP listener refactoring, part 4 :

To speed up inet lookups, we moved IPv4 addresses from inet to struct
sock_common

Now is time to do the same for IPv6, because it permits us to have fast
lookups for all kind of sockets, including upcoming SYN_RECV.

Getting IPv6 addresses in TCP lookups currently requires two extra cache
lines, plus a dereference (and memory stall).

inet6_sk(sk) does the dereference of inet_sk(__sk)->pinet6

This patch is way bigger than its IPv4 counter part, because for IPv4,
we could add aliases (inet_daddr, inet_rcv_saddr), while on IPv6,
it's not doable easily.

inet6_sk(sk)->daddr becomes sk->sk_v6_daddr
inet6_sk(sk)->rcv_saddr becomes sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr

And timewait socket also have tw->tw_v6_daddr & tw->tw_v6_rcv_saddr
at the same offset.

We get rid of INET6_TW_MATCH() as INET6_MATCH() is now the generic
macro.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

ping_v6_sendmsg currently returns 0 on success. It should return
the number of bytes written instead.
Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

net/ipv4/ping.c:286:5: sparse: symbol 'ping_check_bind_addr' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv4/ping.c:355:6: sparse: symbol 'ping_set_saddr' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv4/ping.c:370:6: sparse: symbol 'ping_clear_saddr' was not declared. Should it be static?

net/ipv6/ping.c:60:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_recv_error' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:64:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ip6_datagram_recv_ctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:69:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_icmpv6_err_convert' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:73:6: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_icmp_error' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:75:5: sparse: symbol 'dummy_ipv6_chk_addr' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/ping.c:201:5: sparse: symbol 'ping_v6_seq_show' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The format is based on /proc/net/icmp and /proc/net/{udp,raw}6.

Compiles and displays reasonable results with CONFIG_IPV6={n,m,y}
Couldn't figure out how to test without CONFIG_PROC_FS enabled.
Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This adds the ability to send ICMPv6 echo requests without a
raw socket. The equivalent ability for ICMPv4 was added in
2011.

Instead of having separate code paths for IPv4 and IPv6, make
most of the code in net/ipv4/ping.c dual-stack and only add a
few IPv6-specific bits (like the protocol definition) to a new
net/ipv6/ping.c. Hopefully this will reduce divergence and/or
duplication of bugs in the future.

Caveats:

- Setting options via ancillary data (e.g., using IPV6_PKTINFO
  to specify the outgoing interface) is not yet supported.
- There are no separate security settings for IPv4 and IPv6;
  everything is controlled by /proc/net/ipv4/ping_group_range.
- The proc interface does not yet display IPv6 ping sockets
  properly.

Tested with a patched copy of ping6 and using raw socket calls.
Compiles and works with all of CONFIG_IPV6={n,m,y}.
Signed-off-by: NLorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>