提交 9b91ad27 编写于 作者: G Gerrit Renker 提交者: David S. Miller

[DCCP]: Make PARTOPEN an autonomous state

This decouples PARTOPEN from TCP-specific stream-states.

It thus addresses the FIXME.

The code has been checked with regard to dependency on PARTOPEN and FIN_WAIT1
states (to which PARTOPEN previously was mapped): there is no difference, as
PARTOPEN is always referred to directly (i.e. not via the mapping to TCP
state).
Signed-off-by: NGerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: NIan McDonald <ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 c3ada46a
......@@ -229,21 +229,13 @@ struct dccp_so_feat {
enum dccp_state {
DCCP_OPEN = TCP_ESTABLISHED,
DCCP_REQUESTING = TCP_SYN_SENT,
DCCP_PARTOPEN = TCP_FIN_WAIT1, /* FIXME:
This mapping is horrible, but TCP has
no matching state for DCCP_PARTOPEN,
as TCP_SYN_RECV is already used by
DCCP_RESPOND, why don't stop using TCP
mapping of states? OK, now we don't use
sk_stream_sendmsg anymore, so doesn't
seem to exist any reason for us to
do the TCP mapping here */
DCCP_LISTEN = TCP_LISTEN,
DCCP_RESPOND = TCP_SYN_RECV,
DCCP_CLOSING = TCP_CLOSING,
DCCP_TIME_WAIT = TCP_TIME_WAIT,
DCCP_CLOSED = TCP_CLOSE,
DCCP_MAX_STATES = TCP_MAX_STATES,
DCCP_PARTOPEN = TCP_MAX_STATES,
DCCP_MAX_STATES
};
#define DCCP_STATE_MASK 0xf
......@@ -252,12 +244,12 @@ enum dccp_state {
enum {
DCCPF_OPEN = TCPF_ESTABLISHED,
DCCPF_REQUESTING = TCPF_SYN_SENT,
DCCPF_PARTOPEN = TCPF_FIN_WAIT1,
DCCPF_LISTEN = TCPF_LISTEN,
DCCPF_RESPOND = TCPF_SYN_RECV,
DCCPF_CLOSING = TCPF_CLOSING,
DCCPF_TIME_WAIT = TCPF_TIME_WAIT,
DCCPF_CLOSED = TCPF_CLOSE,
DCCPF_PARTOPEN = 1 << DCCP_PARTOPEN,
};
static inline struct dccp_hdr *dccp_hdr(const struct sk_buff *skb)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册