提交 61da026d 编写于 作者: B Ben Hutchings

sfc: Hold the RTNL lock for more of the suspend/resume cycle

I don't think these PM functions can race with userland net device
operations, but it's much easier to reason about locking if state is
consistently guarded by the same lock.
Signed-off-by: NBen Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
上级 f16aeea0
......@@ -2727,6 +2727,8 @@ static int efx_pm_freeze(struct device *dev)
{
struct efx_nic *efx = pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(dev));
rtnl_lock();
efx->state = STATE_UNINIT;
netif_device_detach(efx->net_dev);
......@@ -2734,6 +2736,8 @@ static int efx_pm_freeze(struct device *dev)
efx_stop_all(efx);
efx_stop_interrupts(efx, false);
rtnl_unlock();
return 0;
}
......@@ -2741,6 +2745,8 @@ static int efx_pm_thaw(struct device *dev)
{
struct efx_nic *efx = pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(dev));
rtnl_lock();
efx_start_interrupts(efx, false);
mutex_lock(&efx->mac_lock);
......@@ -2755,6 +2761,8 @@ static int efx_pm_thaw(struct device *dev)
efx->type->resume_wol(efx);
rtnl_unlock();
/* Reschedule any quenched resets scheduled during efx_pm_freeze() */
queue_work(reset_workqueue, &efx->reset_work);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册