提交 57911b8b 编写于 作者: J Jan Schmidt

Btrfs: don't put removals from push_node_left into tree mod log twice

Independant of the check (push_items < src_items) tree_mod_log_eb_copy did
log the removal of the old data entries from the source buffer. Therefore,
we must not call tree_mod_log_eb_move if the check evaluates to true, as
that would log the removal twice, finally resulting in (rewinded) buffers
with wrong values for header_nritems.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
上级 f46dbe3d
......@@ -1225,6 +1225,8 @@ tree_mod_log_rewind(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *eb,
free_extent_buffer(eb);
__tree_mod_log_rewind(eb_rewin, time_seq, tm);
WARN_ON(btrfs_header_nritems(eb_rewin) >
BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info->fs_root));
return eb_rewin;
}
......@@ -1280,6 +1282,7 @@ get_old_root(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 time_seq)
else
WARN_ON(btrfs_header_level(eb) != 0);
extent_buffer_get(eb);
WARN_ON(btrfs_header_nritems(eb) > BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(root));
return eb;
}
......@@ -2970,8 +2973,10 @@ static int push_node_left(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
push_items * sizeof(struct btrfs_key_ptr));
if (push_items < src_nritems) {
tree_mod_log_eb_move(root->fs_info, src, 0, push_items,
src_nritems - push_items);
/*
* don't call tree_mod_log_eb_move here, key removal was already
* fully logged by tree_mod_log_eb_copy above.
*/
memmove_extent_buffer(src, btrfs_node_key_ptr_offset(0),
btrfs_node_key_ptr_offset(push_items),
(src_nritems - push_items) *
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册