提交 19952a92 编写于 作者: K Kees Cook 提交者: Ingo Molnar

stackprotector: Unify the HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR logic between architectures

Instead of duplicating the CC_STACKPROTECTOR Kconfig and
Makefile logic in each architecture, switch to using
HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR and keep everything in one place. This
retains the x86-specific bug verification scripts.
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1387481759-14535-2-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 b0031f22
......@@ -595,10 +595,18 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_FRAME_WARN),0)
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-Wframe-larger-than=${CONFIG_FRAME_WARN})
endif
# Force gcc to behave correct even for buggy distributions
ifndef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
# Handle stack protector mode.
ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
stackp-flag := -fstack-protector
ifeq ($(call cc-option, $(stackp-flag)),)
$(warning Cannot use CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR: \
-fstack-protector not supported by compiler))
endif
else
# Force off for distro compilers that enable stack protector by default.
stackp-flag := $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
endif
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-flag)
# This warning generated too much noise in a regular build.
# Use make W=1 to enable this warning (see scripts/Makefile.build)
......
......@@ -336,6 +336,28 @@ config SECCOMP_FILTER
See Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt for details.
config HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
bool
help
An arch should select this symbol if:
- its compiler supports the -fstack-protector option
- it has implemented a stack canary (e.g. __stack_chk_guard)
config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection"
depends on HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
help
This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This
feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
the stack just before the return address, and validates
the value just before actually returning. Stack based buffer
overflows (that need to overwrite this return address) now also
overwrite the canary, which gets detected and the attack is then
neutralized via a kernel panic.
This feature requires gcc version 4.2 or above, or a distribution
gcc with the feature backported.
config HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
bool
help
......
......@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ config ARM
select HAVE_BPF_JIT
select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT
select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG
select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS
......@@ -1856,18 +1857,6 @@ config SECCOMP
and the task is only allowed to execute a few safe syscalls
defined by each seccomp mode.
config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection (EXPERIMENTAL)"
help
This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This
feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
the stack just before the return address, and validates
the value just before actually returning. Stack based buffer
overflows (that need to overwrite this return address) now also
overwrite the canary, which gets detected and the attack is then
neutralized via a kernel panic.
This feature requires gcc version 4.2 or above.
config SWIOTLB
def_bool y
......
......@@ -40,10 +40,6 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER),y)
KBUILD_CFLAGS +=-fno-omit-frame-pointer -mapcs -mno-sched-prolog
endif
ifeq ($(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR),y)
KBUILD_CFLAGS +=-fstack-protector
endif
ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN),y)
KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += -mbig-endian
AS += -EB
......
......@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ config MIPS
select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if MODULES && 64BIT
select CLONE_BACKWARDS
select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
menu "Machine selection"
......@@ -2322,19 +2323,6 @@ config SECCOMP
If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here.
config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection (EXPERIMENTAL)"
help
This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This
feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
the stack just before the return address, and validates
the value just before actually returning. Stack based buffer
overflows (that need to overwrite this return address) now also
overwrite the canary, which gets detected and the attack is then
neutralized via a kernel panic.
This feature requires gcc version 4.2 or above.
config USE_OF
bool
select OF
......
......@@ -232,10 +232,6 @@ bootvars-y = VMLINUX_LOAD_ADDRESS=$(load-y) \
LDFLAGS += -m $(ld-emul)
ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fstack-protector
endif
ifdef CONFIG_MIPS
CHECKFLAGS += $(shell $(CC) $(KBUILD_CFLAGS) -dM -E -x c /dev/null | \
egrep -vw '__GNUC_(|MINOR_|PATCHLEVEL_)_' | \
......
......@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ config SUPERH32
select PERF_EVENTS
select ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE if MMU
select SPARSE_IRQ
select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
config SUPERH64
def_bool ARCH = "sh64"
......@@ -695,20 +696,6 @@ config SECCOMP
If unsure, say N.
config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection (EXPERIMENTAL)"
depends on SUPERH32
help
This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This
feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
the stack just before the return address, and validates
the value just before actually returning. Stack based buffer
overflows (that need to overwrite this return address) now also
overwrite the canary, which gets detected and the attack is then
neutralized via a kernel panic.
This feature requires gcc version 4.2 or above.
config SMP
bool "Symmetric multi-processing support"
depends on SYS_SUPPORTS_SMP
......
......@@ -199,10 +199,6 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_DWARF_UNWINDER),y)
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
endif
ifeq ($(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR),y)
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fstack-protector
endif
libs-$(CONFIG_SUPERH32) := arch/sh/lib/ $(libs-y)
libs-$(CONFIG_SUPERH64) := arch/sh/lib64/ $(libs-y)
......
......@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ config X86
select RTC_LIB
select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
select HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK if X86_64
select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
config INSTRUCTION_DECODER
def_bool y
......@@ -1617,22 +1618,6 @@ config SECCOMP
If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here.
config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection"
---help---
This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This
feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
the stack just before the return address, and validates
the value just before actually returning. Stack based buffer
overflows (that need to overwrite this return address) now also
overwrite the canary, which gets detected and the attack is then
neutralized via a kernel panic.
This feature requires gcc version 4.2 or above, or a distribution
gcc with the feature backported. Older versions are automatically
detected and for those versions, this configuration option is
ignored. (and a warning is printed during bootup)
source kernel/Kconfig.hz
config KEXEC
......
......@@ -89,13 +89,11 @@ else
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -maccumulate-outgoing-args
endif
# Make sure compiler does not have buggy stack-protector support.
ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
cc_has_sp := $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_$(BITS)-has-stack-protector.sh
ifeq ($(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(cc_has_sp) $(CC) $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(biarch)),y)
stackp-y := -fstack-protector
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-y)
else
$(warning stack protector enabled but no compiler support)
ifneq ($(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(cc_has_sp) $(CC) $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(biarch)),y)
$(warning stack-protector enabled but compiler support broken)
endif
endif
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册