提交 077c5407 编写于 作者: S Steven Rostedt 提交者: Steven Rostedt

ring-buffer: disable all cpu buffers when one finds a problem

Currently the way RB_WARN_ON works, is to disable either the current
CPU buffer or all CPU buffers, depending on whether a ring_buffer or
ring_buffer_per_cpu struct was passed into the macro.

Most users of the RB_WARN_ON pass in the CPU buffer, so only the one
CPU buffer gets disabled but the rest are still active. This may
confuse users even though a warning is sent to the console.

This patch changes the macro to disable the entire buffer even if
the CPU buffer is passed in.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
上级 a1863c21
......@@ -467,14 +467,19 @@ struct ring_buffer_iter {
};
/* buffer may be either ring_buffer or ring_buffer_per_cpu */
#define RB_WARN_ON(buffer, cond) \
({ \
int _____ret = unlikely(cond); \
if (_____ret) { \
atomic_inc(&buffer->record_disabled); \
WARN_ON(1); \
} \
_____ret; \
#define RB_WARN_ON(b, cond) \
({ \
int _____ret = unlikely(cond); \
if (_____ret) { \
if (__same_type(*(b), struct ring_buffer_per_cpu)) { \
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *__b = \
(void *)b; \
atomic_inc(&__b->buffer->record_disabled); \
} else \
atomic_inc(&b->record_disabled); \
WARN_ON(1); \
} \
_____ret; \
})
/* Up this if you want to test the TIME_EXTENTS and normalization */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册