tty/ldsem, locking/rwsem: Add missing ACQUIRE to read_failed sleep loop

[ Upstream commit 952041a8639a7a3a73a2b6573cb8aa8518bc39f8 ]

While reviewing rwsem down_slowpath, Will noticed ldsem had a copy of
a bug we just found for rwsem.

  X = 0;

  CPU0			CPU1

  rwsem_down_read()
    for (;;) {
      set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);

                        X = 1;
                        rwsem_up_write();
                          rwsem_mark_wake()
                            atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count);
                            smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL);

      if (!waiter.task)
        break;

      ...
    }

  r = X;

Allows 'r == 0'.
Reported-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 4898e640 ("tty: Add timed, writer-prioritized rw semaphore")
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

drivers/tty/tty_ldsem.c

@@ -116,8 +116,7 @@ static void __ldsem_wake_readers(struct ld_semaphore *sem)
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(waiter, next, &sem->read_wait, list) {
 		tsk = waiter->task;
-		smp_mb();
-		waiter->task = NULL;
+		smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL);
 		wake_up_process(tsk);
 		put_task_struct(tsk);
 	}
@@ -217,7 +216,7 @@ down_read_failed(struct ld_semaphore *sem, long count, long timeout)
 	for (;;) {
 		set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
 
-		if (!waiter.task)
+		if (!smp_load_acquire(&waiter.task))
 			break;
 		if (!timeout)
 			break;