o This patch prepares the base for introducing new IO control policies.
  Currently all the code is written knowing there is only one policy
  and that is proportional bandwidth. Creating infrastructure for newer
  policies to come in.

o Also there were many functions which were generated using macro. It was
  very confusing. Got rid of those.
Signed-off-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

e98ef89b has a typo, causing cfq_blkiocg_update_completion_stats()
to call itself instead of blkiocg_update_completion_stats().
Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>

Hi Jens,

Few days back Ingo noticed a CFQ boot time warning. This patch fixes it.
The issue here is that with CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED=n, CFQ should not really
be making blkio stat related calls.

> Hm, it's still not entirely fixed, as of 2.6.35-rc2-00131-g7908a9e5. With
> some
> configs i get bad spinlock warnings during bootup:
>
> [   28.968013] initcall net_olddevs_init+0x0/0x82 returned 0 after 93750
> usecs
> [   28.972003] calling  b44_init+0x0/0x55 @ 1
> [   28.976009] bus: 'pci': add driver b44
> [   28.976374]  sda:
> [   28.978157] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, async/0/117
> [   28.980000]  lock: 7e1c5bbc, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, +.owner_cpu: 0
> [   28.980000] Pid: 117, comm: async/0 Not tainted +2.6.35-rc2-tip-01092-g010e7ef-dirty #8183
> [   28.980000] Call Trace:
> [   28.980000]  [<41ba6d55>] ? printk+0x20/0x24
> [   28.980000]  [<4134b7b7>] spin_bug+0x7c/0x87
> [   28.980000]  [<4134b853>] do_raw_spin_lock+0x1e/0x123
> [   28.980000]  [<41ba92ca>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x12/0x20
> [   28.980000]  [<41ba92d2>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1a/0x20
> [   28.980000]  [<4133476f>] blkiocg_update_io_add_stats+0x25/0xfb
> [   28.980000]  [<41335dae>] ? cfq_prio_tree_add+0xb1/0xc1
> [   28.980000]  [<41337bc7>] cfq_insert_request+0x8c/0x425
Signed-off-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>