提交 ce723d8e 编写于 作者: J Julian Anastasov 提交者: David S. Miller

[IPV4]: Fix refcount damaging in net/ipv4/route.c

	One such place that can damage the dst refcnts is route.c with
CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED enabled, i don't see the user's
.config. In this new code i see that rt_intern_hash is called before
dst->refcnt is set to 1, dst is the 2nd arg to rt_intern_hash.

Arg 2 of rt_intern_hash must come with refcnt 1 as it is added to
table or dropped depending on error/add/update. One such example is
ip_mkroute_input where __mkroute_input return rth with refcnt 0 which
is provided to rt_intern_hash. ip_mkroute_output looks like a 2nd such
place. Appending untested patch for comments and review.  The idea is
to put previous reference as we are going to return next result/error.
Signed-off-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 c921e4c4
......@@ -1760,6 +1760,7 @@ static inline int __mkroute_input(struct sk_buff *skb,
goto cleanup;
}
atomic_set(&rth->u.dst.__refcnt, 1);
rth->u.dst.flags= DST_HOST;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED
if (res->fi->fib_nhs > 1)
......@@ -1820,7 +1821,6 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_input_def(struct sk_buff *skb,
err = __mkroute_input(skb, res, in_dev, daddr, saddr, tos, &rth);
if (err)
return err;
atomic_set(&rth->u.dst.__refcnt, 1);
/* put it into the cache */
hash = rt_hash_code(daddr, saddr ^ (fl->iif << 5), tos);
......@@ -1834,8 +1834,8 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_input(struct sk_buff *skb,
u32 daddr, u32 saddr, u32 tos)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED
struct rtable* rth = NULL;
unsigned char hop, hopcount, lasthop;
struct rtable* rth = NULL, *rtres;
unsigned char hop, hopcount;
int err = -EINVAL;
unsigned int hash;
......@@ -1844,8 +1844,6 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_input(struct sk_buff *skb,
else
hopcount = 1;
lasthop = hopcount - 1;
/* distinguish between multipath and singlepath */
if (hopcount < 2)
return ip_mkroute_input_def(skb, res, fl, in_dev, daddr,
......@@ -1855,6 +1853,10 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_input(struct sk_buff *skb,
for (hop = 0; hop < hopcount; hop++) {
res->nh_sel = hop;
/* put reference to previous result */
if (hop)
ip_rt_put(rtres);
/* create a routing cache entry */
err = __mkroute_input(skb, res, in_dev, daddr, saddr, tos,
&rth);
......@@ -1863,7 +1865,7 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_input(struct sk_buff *skb,
/* put it into the cache */
hash = rt_hash_code(daddr, saddr ^ (fl->iif << 5), tos);
err = rt_intern_hash(hash, rth, (struct rtable**)&skb->dst);
err = rt_intern_hash(hash, rth, &rtres);
if (err)
return err;
......@@ -1873,13 +1875,8 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_input(struct sk_buff *skb,
FIB_RES_NETMASK(*res),
res->prefixlen,
&FIB_RES_NH(*res));
/* only for the last hop the reference count is handled
* outside
*/
if (hop == lasthop)
atomic_set(&(skb->dst->__refcnt), 1);
}
skb->dst = &rtres->u.dst;
return err;
#else /* CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED */
return ip_mkroute_input_def(skb, res, fl, in_dev, daddr, saddr, tos);
......@@ -2208,6 +2205,7 @@ static inline int __mkroute_output(struct rtable **result,
goto cleanup;
}
atomic_set(&rth->u.dst.__refcnt, 1);
rth->u.dst.flags= DST_HOST;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED
if (res->fi) {
......@@ -2290,8 +2288,6 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_output_def(struct rtable **rp,
if (err == 0) {
u32 tos = RT_FL_TOS(oldflp);
atomic_set(&rth->u.dst.__refcnt, 1);
hash = rt_hash_code(oldflp->fl4_dst,
oldflp->fl4_src ^ (oldflp->oif << 5), tos);
err = rt_intern_hash(hash, rth, rp);
......@@ -2326,6 +2322,10 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_output(struct rtable** rp,
dev2nexthop = FIB_RES_DEV(*res);
dev_hold(dev2nexthop);
/* put reference to previous result */
if (hop)
ip_rt_put(*rp);
err = __mkroute_output(&rth, res, fl, oldflp,
dev2nexthop, flags);
......@@ -2350,7 +2350,6 @@ static inline int ip_mkroute_output(struct rtable** rp,
if (err != 0)
return err;
}
atomic_set(&(*rp)->u.dst.__refcnt, 1);
return err;
} else {
return ip_mkroute_output_def(rp, res, fl, oldflp, dev_out,
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册