提交 41591750 编写于 作者: T Theodore Ts'o

ext4: Don't update ctime for non-extent-mapped inodes

The VFS handles updating ctime, so we don't need to update the inode's
ctime in ext4_splace_branch() to update the direct or indirect blocks.
This was harmless when we did this in ext3, but in ext4, thanks to
delayed allocation, updating the ctime in ext4_splice_branch() can
cause the ctime to mysteriously jump when the blocks are finally
allocated.

Thanks to Björn Steinbrink for pointing out this problem on the git
mailing list.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
上级 de9a55b8
......@@ -856,10 +856,6 @@ static int ext4_splice_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
}
/* We are done with atomic stuff, now do the rest of housekeeping */
inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);
ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
/* had we spliced it onto indirect block? */
if (where->bh) {
/*
......@@ -878,8 +874,8 @@ static int ext4_splice_branch(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
} else {
/*
* OK, we spliced it into the inode itself on a direct block.
* Inode was dirtied above.
*/
ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
jbd_debug(5, "splicing direct\n");
}
return err;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册