- bpf prog_array just like all other types of bpf array accepts 32-bit index.
  Clarify that in the comment.
- fix x64 JIT of bpf_tail_call which was incorrectly loading 8 instead of 4 bytes
- tighten corresponding check in the interpreter to stay consistent

The JIT bug can be triggered after introduction of BPF_F_NUMA_NODE flag
in commit 96eabe7a in 4.14. Before that the map_flags would stay zero and
though JIT code is wrong it will check bounds correctly.
Hence two fixes tags. All other JITs don't have this problem.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fixes: 96eabe7a ("bpf: Allow selecting numa node during map creation")
Fixes: b52f00e6 ("x86: bpf_jit: implement bpf_tail_call() helper")
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>