Conflicts:
	db/db_impl.cc
	db/version_edit.cc
	db/version_edit.h
	db/version_set.cc

Summary:
There is a chance that an old MANIFEST is corrupted in 2.7 but just not noticed.
This check would fail them. Change it to log instead of returning a
Corruption status.

Test Plan: make

Reviewers: haobo, igor

Reviewed By: igor

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16923

Summary: Replace "RocskDB" by "RocksDB" in INSTALL.md

Test Plan: No code change.

Reviewers: ljin, igor

Reviewed By: ljin

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16977

Summary:
Based on my recent findings (posted in our internal group), if we use fallocate without KEEP_SIZE flag, we get superior performance of fdatasync() in append-only workloads.

This diff provides an option for user to not use KEEP_SIZE flag, thus optimizing his sync performance by up to 2x-3x.

At one point we also just called posix_fallocate instead of fallocate, which isn't very fast: http://code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/sysdeps/posix/posix_fallocate.c.html (tl;dr it manually writes out zero bytes to allocate storage). This diff also fixes that, by first calling fallocate and then posix_fallocate if fallocate is not supported.

Test Plan: make check

Reviewers: dhruba, sdong, haobo, ljin

Reviewed By: dhruba

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16761

Summary:
When the manifest is getting rolled the following happens:
1) manifest_file_number_ is assigned to a new manifest number (even though the old one is still current)
2) mutex is unlocked
3) SetCurrentFile() creates temporary file manifest_file_number_.dbtmp
4) SetCurrentFile() renames manifest_file_number_.dbtmp to CURRENT
5) mutex is locked

If FindObsoleteFiles happens between (3) and (4) it will:
1) Delete manifest_file_number_.dbtmp (because it's not in pending_outputs_)
2) Delete old manifest (because the manifest_file_number_ already points to a new one)

I introduce the concept of prev_manifest_file_number_ that will avoid the race condition.

However, we should discuss the future of MANIFEST file rolling. We found some race conditions with it last week and who knows how many more are there. Nobody is using it in production because we don't trust the implementation. Should we even support it?

Test Plan: make check

Reviewers: ljin, dhruba, haobo, sdong

Reviewed By: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16929

Conflicts:
	utilities/backupable/backupable_db.cc

Summary: We switched to prefix_seek method of seeking. This means that anytime we check Valid(), we also need to check starts_with(prefix)

Test Plan: ran db_stress

Reviewers: ljin

Reviewed By: ljin

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16953

Summary:
Added an option to BackupableDB implementation that allows users to persist in-memory databases. When the restore happens with keep_log_files = true, it will
*) Not delete existing log files in wal_dir
*) Move log files from archive directory to wal_dir, so that DB can replay them if necessary

Test Plan: Added an unit test

Reviewers: dhruba, ljin

Reviewed By: dhruba

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16941

Conflicts:
	db/version_set.cc
	tools/db_stress.cc

Summary:
Memtable will now be forced to flush if the one of the following
conditions is met:
1. Already allocated more than write_buffer_size + 60% arena block size.
   (the overflowing condition)
2. Unable to safely allocate one more arena block without hitting the
   overflowing condition AND the unused allocated memory < 25% arena
   block size.

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: sdong, haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16893

Summary: We're trying to deprecate prefix iterators, so no need to test them in db_stress

Test Plan: ran it

Reviewers: ljin

Reviewed By: ljin

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16917

Summary: Prev() now can hang when there is a key with more than max_skipped number of appearance internally but all of them are newer than the sequence ID to seek. Add unit tests to confirm the bug and fix it.

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: igor, haobo

Reviewed By: igor

CC: ljin, yhchiang, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16899

Summary:
We need to stop these:
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/99
https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/83

Test Plan: no

Reviewers: dhruba, haobo, sdong, ljin, yhchiang

Reviewed By: ljin

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16905

Make it compile on Debian/GCC 4.7

Summary:
In the last fix, I forgot to point to the writer when comparing edit,
which is apparently not correct.

Test Plan: still running make whitebox_crash_test

Reviewers: igor, haobo, igor2

Reviewed By: igor2

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16911

Summary:
Here is what it can cause probelm:
There is one memtable flush and one compaction. Both call LogAndApply(). If both edits are applied in the same batch with flush edit first and the compaction edit followed. LogAndApplyHelper() will assign compaction edit current VersionSet's log number(which should be smaller than the log number from flush edit). It cause log_numbers in MANIFEST to be not monotonic increasing, which violates the assume Recover() makes. What is more is after comitting to MANIFEST file, log_number_ in VersionSet is updated to the log_number from the last edit, which is the compaction one. It ends up not updating the log_number.

Test Plan:
make whitebox_crash_test
got another assertion about iter->valid(), not sure if that is related
to this.

Reviewers: igor, haobo

Reviewed By: igor

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16875

Fix copyright year

Summary: Client doesn't need to know anything about ColumnFamily ID. By making WriteBatch take ColumnFamilyHandle as a parameter, we can eliminate method GetID() from ColumnFamilyHandle

Test Plan: column_family_test

Reviewers: haobo

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16887

Summary:
Original Summary:
Yesterday, @ljin and I were debugging various db_stress issues. We suspected one of them happens when we concurrently call NewIterator without prefix_seek on HashSkipList. This test demonstrates it.

Update:
Arena is not thread-safe!! When creating a new full iterator, we *have* to create a new arena, otherwise we're doomed.

Test Plan: SIGSEGV and assertion-throwing test now works!

Reviewers: ljin, haobo, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

CC: leveldb, ljin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16857

Conflicts:
	db/db_impl.cc
	db/db_test.cc
	tools/db_stress.cc

Summary:
With D16767, there is a case compaction tasks are scheduled infinitely:
(1) no flush thread is configured and more than 1 compaction threads
(2) a flush is going on by one compaction hread
(3) the state of SST files is in the state that versions_->current()->NeedsCompaction() will generate a false positive (return true actually there is no work to be done)
In that case, a infinite loop will be formed.

This patch would fix it.

Test Plan: make all check

Reviewers: haobo, igor, ljin

Reviewed By: igor

CC: dhruba, yhchiang, leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16863

This reverts commit 86926d8c.

Summary:
this should fix the hash_skip_list issue, but I still see seqno
assertion failure in the last run. Will continue investigating and
address that in a different diff

Test Plan: make whitebox_crash_test

Reviewers: igor

Reviewed By: igor

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16851

Summary:
Hash skip list has issues, causing db_stress to fail badly.

For now, switching back to skip_list by default before we figure out root cause.

Test Plan: db_stress is happy(ier)

Reviewers: ljin

Reviewed By: ljin

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16845

Summary:
This is is based on https://reviews.facebook.net/D15027. It's not finished but I would like to give a prototype to avoid arena over-allocation while making better use of the already allocated memory blocks.

Instead of check approximate memtable size, we will take a deeper look at the arena, which incorporate essential idea that @sdong suggests: flush when arena has allocated its last and the last is "almost full"

Test Plan: N/A

Reviewers: haobo, sdong

Reviewed By: sdong

CC: leveldb, sdong

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D15051

Summary: Syncing in stress test makes it run much much much slower. It also doesn't add much value IMO.

Test Plan: no

Reviewers: ljin

Reviewed By: ljin

CC: leveldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.facebook.net/D16839