提交 f81ea75d 编写于 作者: P Peter Dillinger 提交者: Facebook GitHub Bot

Don't count no prefix as Bloom hit (#10244)

Summary:
When a key is "out of domain" for the prefix_extractor (no
prefix assigned) then the Bloom filter is not queried. PerfContext
was counting this as a Bloom "hit" while Statistics doesn't count this
as a prefix Bloom checked. I think it's more accurate to call it neither
hit nor miss, so changing the counting to make it PerfContext coounting
more like Statistics.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10244

Test Plan:
tests updates and expanded (Get and MultiGet). Iterator test
coverage of the change will come in next PR

Reviewed By: bjlemaire

Differential Revision: D37371297

Pulled By: pdillinger

fbshipit-source-id: fed132fba6a92b2314ab898d449fce2d1586c157
上级 5879053f
......@@ -2467,35 +2467,37 @@ TEST_P(MultiGetPrefixExtractorTest, Batched) {
SetPerfLevel(kEnableCount);
get_perf_context()->Reset();
// First key is not in the prefix_extractor domain
ASSERT_OK(Put("k", "v0"));
ASSERT_OK(Put("kk1", "v1"));
ASSERT_OK(Put("kk2", "v2"));
ASSERT_OK(Put("kk3", "v3"));
ASSERT_OK(Put("kk4", "v4"));
std::vector<std::string> mem_keys(
std::vector<std::string> keys(
{"k", "kk1", "kk2", "kk3", "kk4", "rofl", "lmho"});
std::vector<std::string> inmem_values;
inmem_values = MultiGet(mem_keys, nullptr);
ASSERT_EQ(inmem_values[0], "v0");
ASSERT_EQ(inmem_values[1], "v1");
ASSERT_EQ(inmem_values[2], "v2");
ASSERT_EQ(inmem_values[3], "v3");
ASSERT_EQ(inmem_values[4], "v4");
std::vector<std::string> expected(
{"v0", "v1", "v2", "v3", "v4", "NOT_FOUND", "NOT_FOUND"});
std::vector<std::string> values;
values = MultiGet(keys, nullptr);
ASSERT_EQ(values, expected);
// One key ("k") is not queried against the filter because it is outside
// the prefix_extractor domain, leaving 6 keys with queried prefixes.
ASSERT_EQ(get_perf_context()->bloom_memtable_miss_count, 2);
ASSERT_EQ(get_perf_context()->bloom_memtable_hit_count, 5);
ASSERT_EQ(get_perf_context()->bloom_memtable_hit_count, 4);
ASSERT_OK(Flush());
std::vector<std::string> keys({"k", "kk1", "kk2", "kk3", "kk4"});
std::vector<std::string> values;
get_perf_context()->Reset();
values = MultiGet(keys, nullptr);
ASSERT_EQ(values[0], "v0");
ASSERT_EQ(values[1], "v1");
ASSERT_EQ(values[2], "v2");
ASSERT_EQ(values[3], "v3");
ASSERT_EQ(values[4], "v4");
// Filter hits for 4 in-domain keys
ASSERT_EQ(values, expected);
ASSERT_EQ(get_perf_context()->bloom_sst_miss_count, 2);
ASSERT_EQ(get_perf_context()->bloom_sst_hit_count, 4);
// Also check Get stat
get_perf_context()->Reset();
for (size_t i = 0; i < keys.size(); ++i) {
values[i] = Get(keys[i]);
}
ASSERT_EQ(values, expected);
ASSERT_EQ(get_perf_context()->bloom_sst_miss_count, 2);
ASSERT_EQ(get_perf_context()->bloom_sst_hit_count, 4);
}
......
......@@ -334,14 +334,15 @@ class MemTableIterator : public InternalIterator {
// iterator should only use prefix bloom filter
auto ts_sz = comparator_.comparator.user_comparator()->timestamp_size();
Slice user_k_without_ts(ExtractUserKeyAndStripTimestamp(k, ts_sz));
if (prefix_extractor_->InDomain(user_k_without_ts) &&
!bloom_->MayContain(
prefix_extractor_->Transform(user_k_without_ts))) {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_miss_count, 1);
valid_ = false;
return;
} else {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_hit_count, 1);
if (prefix_extractor_->InDomain(user_k_without_ts)) {
if (!bloom_->MayContain(
prefix_extractor_->Transform(user_k_without_ts))) {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_miss_count, 1);
valid_ = false;
return;
} else {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_hit_count, 1);
}
}
}
iter_->Seek(k, nullptr);
......@@ -353,14 +354,15 @@ class MemTableIterator : public InternalIterator {
if (bloom_) {
auto ts_sz = comparator_.comparator.user_comparator()->timestamp_size();
Slice user_k_without_ts(ExtractUserKeyAndStripTimestamp(k, ts_sz));
if (prefix_extractor_->InDomain(user_k_without_ts) &&
!bloom_->MayContain(
prefix_extractor_->Transform(user_k_without_ts))) {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_miss_count, 1);
valid_ = false;
return;
} else {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_hit_count, 1);
if (prefix_extractor_->InDomain(user_k_without_ts)) {
if (!bloom_->MayContain(
prefix_extractor_->Transform(user_k_without_ts))) {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_miss_count, 1);
valid_ = false;
return;
} else {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_hit_count, 1);
}
}
}
iter_->Seek(k, nullptr);
......@@ -893,16 +895,20 @@ bool MemTable::Get(const LookupKey& key, std::string* value,
bool may_contain = true;
size_t ts_sz = GetInternalKeyComparator().user_comparator()->timestamp_size();
Slice user_key_without_ts = StripTimestampFromUserKey(key.user_key(), ts_sz);
bool bloom_checked = false;
if (bloom_filter_) {
// when both memtable_whole_key_filtering and prefix_extractor_ are set,
// only do whole key filtering for Get() to save CPU
if (moptions_.memtable_whole_key_filtering) {
may_contain = bloom_filter_->MayContain(user_key_without_ts);
bloom_checked = true;
} else {
assert(prefix_extractor_);
may_contain = !prefix_extractor_->InDomain(user_key_without_ts) ||
bloom_filter_->MayContain(
prefix_extractor_->Transform(user_key_without_ts));
if (prefix_extractor_->InDomain(user_key_without_ts)) {
may_contain = bloom_filter_->MayContain(
prefix_extractor_->Transform(user_key_without_ts));
bloom_checked = true;
}
}
}
......@@ -911,7 +917,7 @@ bool MemTable::Get(const LookupKey& key, std::string* value,
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_miss_count, 1);
*seq = kMaxSequenceNumber;
} else {
if (bloom_filter_) {
if (bloom_checked) {
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_hit_count, 1);
}
GetFromTable(key, *max_covering_tombstone_seq, do_merge, callback,
......@@ -988,10 +994,6 @@ void MemTable::MultiGet(const ReadOptions& read_options, MultiGetRange* range,
bloom_keys[num_keys] =
prefix_extractor_->Transform(iter->ukey_without_ts);
range_indexes[num_keys++] = iter.index();
} else {
// TODO: consider not counting these as Bloom hits to more closely
// match bloom_sst_hit_count
PERF_COUNTER_ADD(bloom_memtable_hit_count, 1);
}
}
bloom_filter_->MayContain(num_keys, &bloom_keys[0], &may_match[0]);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册