Summary:
### **Summary:**
To minimize the internal fragmentation caused by the variable size of the compressed blocks, the original block is split according to the jemalloc bin size in `Insert()` and then merged back in `Lookup()`.  Based on the analysis of the results of the following tests, from the overall internal fragmentation perspective, this PR does mitigate the internal fragmentation issue.

_Do more myshadow tests with the latest commit. I finished several myshadow AB Testing and the results are promising. For the config of 4GB primary cache and 3GB secondary cache, Jemalloc resident stats shows consistently ~0.15GB memory saving; the allocated and active stats show similar memory savings. The CPU usage is almost the same before and after this PR._

To evaluate the issue of memory fragmentations and the benefits of this PR, I conducted two sets of local tests as follows.

**T1**
Keys:       16 bytes each (+ 0 bytes user-defined timestamp)
Values:     100 bytes each (50 bytes after compression)
Entries:    90000000
RawSize:    9956.4 MB (estimated)
FileSize:   5664.8 MB (estimated)

| Test Name | Primary Cache Size (MB) | Compressed Secondary Cache Size (MB) |
| - | - | - |
| T1_3 | 4000 | 4000 |
| T1_4 | 2000 | 3000 |

Populate the DB:
./db_bench --benchmarks=fillrandom --num=90000000 -db=/mem_fragmentation/db_bench_1
Overwrite it to a stable state:
./db_bench --benchmarks=overwrite --num=90000000 -use_existing_db -db=/mem_fragmentation/db_bench_1

Run read tests with differnt cache setting:
T1_3:
MALLOC_CONF="prof:true,prof_stats:true" ../rocksdb/db_bench --benchmarks=seekrandom  --threads=16 --num=90000000 -use_existing_db --benchmark_write_rate_limit=52000000 -use_direct_reads --cache_size=4000000000 -compressed_secondary_cache_size=4000000000 -use_compressed_secondary_cache -db=/mem_fragmentation/db_bench_1 --print_malloc_stats=true > ~/temp/mem_frag/20220710/jemalloc_stats_json_T1_3_20220710 -duration=1800 &

T1_4:
MALLOC_CONF="prof:true,prof_stats:true" ../rocksdb/db_bench --benchmarks=seekrandom  --threads=16 --num=90000000 -use_existing_db --benchmark_write_rate_limit=52000000 -use_direct_reads --cache_size=2000000000 -compressed_secondary_cache_size=3000000000 -use_compressed_secondary_cache -db=/mem_fragmentation/db_bench_1 --print_malloc_stats=true > ~/temp/mem_frag/20220710/jemalloc_stats_json_T1_4_20220710 -duration=1800 &

For T1_3 and T1_4, I also conducted the tests before and after this PR. The following table show the important jemalloc stats.

| Test Name | T1_3 | T1_3 after mem defrag | T1_4 | T1_4 after mem defrag |
| - | - | - | - | - |
| allocated (MB)  | 8728 | 8076 | 5518 | 5043 |
| available (MB)  | 8753 | 8092 | 5536 | 5051 |
| external fragmentation rate  | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.0016 |
| resident (MB)  | 8956 | 8365 | 5655 | 5235 |

**T2**
Keys:       32 bytes each (+ 0 bytes user-defined timestamp)
Values:     256 bytes each (128 bytes after compression)
Entries:    40000000
RawSize:    10986.3 MB (estimated)
FileSize:   6103.5 MB (estimated)

| Test Name | Primary Cache Size (MB) | Compressed Secondary Cache Size (MB) |
| - | - | - |
| T2_3 | 4000 | 4000 |
| T2_4 | 2000 | 3000 |

Create DB (10GB):
./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom -use_direct_reads=true -num=40000000 -key_size=32 -value_size=256 -db=/mem_fragmentation/db_bench_2
Overwrite it to a stable state:
./db_bench --benchmarks=overwrite --num=40000000 -use_existing_db -key_size=32 -value_size=256 -db=/mem_fragmentation/db_bench_2

Run read tests with differnt cache setting:
T2_3:
MALLOC_CONF="prof:true,prof_stats:true" ./db_bench  --benchmarks="mixgraph" -use_direct_io_for_flush_and_compaction=true -use_direct_reads=true -cache_size=4000000000 -compressed_secondary_cache_size=4000000000 -use_compressed_secondary_cache -keyrange_dist_a=14.18 -keyrange_dist_b=-2.917 -keyrange_dist_c=0.0164 -keyrange_dist_d=-0.08082 -keyrange_num=30 -value_k=0.2615 -value_sigma=25.45 -iter_k=2.517 -iter_sigma=14.236 -mix_get_ratio=0.85 -mix_put_ratio=0.14 -mix_seek_ratio=0.01 -sine_mix_rate_interval_milliseconds=5000 -sine_a=1000 -sine_b=0.000073 -sine_d=400000 -reads=80000000 -num=40000000 -key_size=32 -value_size=256 -use_existing_db=true -db=/mem_fragmentation/db_bench_2 --print_malloc_stats=true > ~/temp/mem_frag/jemalloc_stats_T2_3 -duration=1800  &

T2_4:
MALLOC_CONF="prof:true,prof_stats:true" ./db_bench  --benchmarks="mixgraph" -use_direct_io_for_flush_and_compaction=true -use_direct_reads=true -cache_size=2000000000 -compressed_secondary_cache_size=3000000000 -use_compressed_secondary_cache -keyrange_dist_a=14.18 -keyrange_dist_b=-2.917 -keyrange_dist_c=0.0164 -keyrange_dist_d=-0.08082 -keyrange_num=30 -value_k=0.2615 -value_sigma=25.45 -iter_k=2.517 -iter_sigma=14.236 -mix_get_ratio=0.85 -mix_put_ratio=0.14 -mix_seek_ratio=0.01 -sine_mix_rate_interval_milliseconds=5000 -sine_a=1000 -sine_b=0.000073 -sine_d=400000 -reads=80000000 -num=40000000 -key_size=32 -value_size=256 -use_existing_db=true -db=/mem_fragmentation/db_bench_2 --print_malloc_stats=true > ~/temp/mem_frag/jemalloc_stats_T2_4 -duration=1800  &

For T2_3 and T2_4, I also conducted the tests before and after this PR. The following table show the important jemalloc stats.

| Test Name |  T2_3 | T2_3 after mem defrag | T2_4 | T2_4 after mem defrag |
| -  | - | - | - | - |
| allocated (MB)  | 8425 | 8093 | 5426 | 5149 |
| available (MB)  | 8489 | 8138 | 5435 | 5158 |
| external fragmentation rate  | 0.008 | 0.0055 | 0.0017 | 0.0017 |
| resident (MB)  | 8676 | 8392 | 5541 | 5321 |

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10287

Test Plan: Unit tests.

Reviewed By: anand1976

Differential Revision: D37743362

Pulled By: gitbw95

fbshipit-source-id: 0010c5af08addeacc5ebbc4ffe5be882fb1d38ad