Summary:
The current level targets for dynamical leveling has a problem: the target level size will dramatically change after a L0->L1 compaction. When there are many L0 bytes, lower level compactions are delayed, but they will be resumed after the L0->L1 compaction finishes, so the expected write amplification benefits might not be realized. The proposal here is to revert the level targetting size, but instead relying on adjusting score for each level to prioritize levels that need to compact most.
Basic idea:
(1) target level size isn't adjusted, but score is adjusted. The reasoning is that with parallel compactions, holding compactions from happening might not be desirable, but we would like the compactions are scheduled from the level we feel most needed. For example, if we have a extra-large L2, we would like all compactions are scheduled for L2->L3 compactions, rather than L4->L5. This gets complicated when a large L0->L1 compaction is going on. Should we compact L2->L3 or L4->L5. So the proposal for that is:
(2) the score is calculated by actual level size / (target size + estimated upper bytes coming down). The reasoning is that if we have a large amount of pending L0/L1 bytes coming down, compacting L2->L3 might be more expensive, as when the L0 bytes are compacted down to L2, the actual L2->L3 fanout would change dramatically. On the other hand, when the amount of bytes coming down to L5, the impacts to L5->L6 fanout are much less. So when calculating target score, we can adjust it by adding estimated downward bytes to the target level size.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10057

Test Plan: Repurpose tests VersionStorageInfoTest.MaxBytesForLevelDynamicWithLargeL0_* tests to cover this scenario.

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D37539742

fbshipit-source-id: 9c154cbfe92023f918cf5d80875d8776ad4831a4