Summary:
**Context/Summary:**
Introduce `manual_wal_flush_one_in` as titled.
- When `manual_wal_flush_one_in  > 0`, we also need tracing to correctly verify recovery because WAL data can be lost in this case when `FlushWAL()` is not explicitly called by users of RocksDB (in our case, db stress) and the recovery from such potential WAL data loss is a prefix recovery that requires tracing to verify. As another consequence, we need to disable features can't run under unsync data loss with `manual_wal_flush_one_in`

Incompatibilities fixed along the way:
```
db_stress: db/db_impl/db_impl_open.cc:2063: static rocksdb::Status rocksdb::DBImpl::Open(const rocksdb::DBOptions&, const string&, const std::vector<rocksdb::ColumnFamilyDescriptor>&, std::vector<rocksdb::ColumnFamilyHandle*>*, rocksdb::DB**, bool, bool): Assertion `impl->TEST_WALBufferIsEmpty()' failed.
```
 - It turns out that `Writer::AddCompressionTypeRecord` before this assertion `EmitPhysicalRecord(kSetCompressionType, encode.data(), encode.size());` but do not trigger flush if `manual_wal_flush` is set . This leads to `impl->TEST_WALBufferIsEmpty()' is false.
    - As suggested, assertion is removed and violation case is handled by `FlushWAL(sync=true)` along with refactoring `TEST_WALBufferIsEmpty()` to be `WALBufferIsEmpty()` since it is used in prod code now.

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10698

Test Plan:
- Locally running `python3 tools/db_crashtest.py blackbox --manual_wal_flush_one_in=1 --manual_wal_flush=1 --sync_wal_one_in=100 --atomic_flush=1 --flush_one_in=100 --column_families=3`
- Joined https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/pull/10624 in auto CI testings with all RocksDB stress/crash test jobs

Reviewed By: ajkr

Differential Revision: D39593752

Pulled By: ajkr

fbshipit-source-id: 3a2135bb792c52d2ffa60257d4fbc557fb04d2ce