This resolves all the problems we had around "normalizing" the representation of a Scalar in case it carries a Pointer value: we can just use Pointer if we want to have a value taht we are sure is already normalized.

These macros have already been removed, but there was still some code
handling these macros. That code is now removed.

Found with https://github.com/est31/warnalyzer.

Dubious changes:
- Is anyone else using rustc_apfloat? I feel weird completely deleting
  x87 support.
- Maybe some of the dead code in rustc_data_structures, in case someone
  wants to use it in the future?
- Don't change rustc_serialize

  I plan to scrap most of the json module in the near future (see
  https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/418) and fixing the
  tests needed more work than I expected.

TODO: check if any of the comments on the deleted code should be kept.

Adjusted LLVM codegen for code compiled with `-Zinstrument-coverage` to
address multiple, somewhat related issues.

Fixed a significant flaw in prior coverage solution: Every counter
generated a new counter variable, but there should have only been one
counter variable per function. This appears to have bloated .profraw
files significantly. (For a small program, it increased the size by
about 40%. I have not tested large programs, but there is anecdotal
evidence that profraw files were way too large. This is a good fix,
regardless, but hopefully it also addresses related issues.

Fixes: #82144

Invalid LLVM coverage data produced when compiled with -C opt-level=1

Existing tests now work up to at least `opt-level=3`. This required a
detailed analysis of the LLVM IR, comparisons with Clang C++ LLVM IR
when compiled with coverage, and a lot of trial and error with codegen
adjustments.

The biggest hurdle was figuring out how to continue to support coverage
results for unused functions and generics. Rust's coverage results have
three advantages over Clang's coverage results:

1. Rust's coverage map does not include any overlapping code regions,
   making coverage counting unambiguous.
2. Rust generates coverage results (showing zero counts) for all unused
   functions, including generics. (Clang does not generate coverage for
   uninstantiated template functions.)
3. Rust's unused functions produce minimal stubbed functions in LLVM IR,
   sufficient for including in the coverage results; while Clang must
   generate the complete LLVM IR for each unused function, even though
   it will never be called.

This PR removes the previous hack of attempting to inject coverage into
some other existing function instance, and generates dedicated instances
for each unused function. This change, and a few other adjustments
(similar to what is required for `-C link-dead-code`, but with lower
impact), makes it possible to support LLVM optimizations.

Fixes: #79651

Coverage report: "Unexecuted instantiation:..." for a generic function
from multiple crates

Fixed by removing the aforementioned hack. Some "Unexecuted
instantiation" notices are unavoidable, as explained in the
`used_crate.rs` test, but `-Zinstrument-coverage` has new options to
back off support for either unused generics, or all unused functions,
which avoids the notice, at the cost of less coverage of unused
functions.

Fixes: #82875

Invalid LLVM coverage data produced with crate brotli_decompressor

Fixed by disabling the LLVM function attribute that forces inlining, if
`-Z instrument-coverage` is enabled. This attribute is applied to
Rust functions with `#[inline(always)], and in some cases, the forced
inlining breaks coverage instrumentation and reports.

Any use of it has been shown to be a bug in the past.

This is in preparation of the `literal` field becoming an enum that distinguishes between type level constants and runtime constants

It was suggested to lower this in MIR instead of ssa, so do that instead.

This updates all places where match branches check on StatementKind or UseContext.
This doesn't properly implement them, but adds TODOs where they are, and also adds some best
guesses to what they should be in some cases.

I'm still not totally sure if this is the right way to implement the memcpy, but that portion
compiles correctly now. Now to fix the compile errors everywhere else :).