This seemed like a good way to kick the tires on the
elided-lifetimes-in-paths lint (#52069)—seems to work! This was also
pretty tedious—it sure would be nice if `cargo fix` worked on this
codebase (#53896)!

During metadata loading, the AdtDefs for every ADT in the universe need
to be loaded (for example, for coherence of builtin traits). For that,
the attributes of the AdtDef need to be loaded too.

The attributes of a struct are duplicated between 2 def ids - the
constructor def-id, and the "type" def id. Loading attributes for both
def-ids, which was done in #53721, slowed the compilation of small
crates by 2-3%. This PR makes sure we only load the attributes for the
"type" def-id, avoiding the slowdown.

This completely splits the IS_NON_EXHAUSTIVE flag. No functional
changes intended.

Structs and enums can both be non-exhaustive, with a very different
meaning. This PR splits `is_non_exhaustive` to 2 separate functions - 1
for structs, and another for enums, and fixes the places that got the
usage confused.

Fixes #53549.

Remove Ty prefix from Ty{Adt|Array|Slice|RawPtr|Ref|FnDef|FnPtr|Dynamic|Closure|Generator|GeneratorWitness|Never|Tuple|Projection|Anon|Infer|Error}

Use `ptr::eq` for comparing pointers

Co-authored-by: NTyler Mandry <tmandry@gmail.com>

It was pointed out in review that the glob-exported
underscore-suffixed convention for `Spanned` HIR nodes is no longer
preferred: see February 2016's #31487 for AST's migration away from
this style towards properly namespaced NodeKind enums.

This concerns #51968.

There are at least a couple (and plausibly even three) diagnostics that
could use the spans of visibility modifiers in order to be reliably
correct (rather than hacking and munging surrounding spans to try to
infer where the visibility keyword must have been).

We follow the naming convention established by the other `Spanned` HIR
nodes: the "outer" type alias gets the "prime" node-type name, the
"inner" enum gets the name suffixed with an underscore, and the variant
names are prefixed with the prime name and `pub use` exported from here
(from HIR).

Thanks to veteran reviewer Vadim Petrochenkov for suggesting this
uniform approach. (A previous draft, based on the reasoning that
`Visibility::Inherited` should not have a span, tried to hack in a named
`span` field on `Visibility::Restricted` and a positional field on
`Public` and `Crate`. This was ... not so uniform.)