1. 03 8月, 2011 7 次提交
  2. 30 7月, 2011 2 次提交
  3. 25 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • B
      The Big Test Suite Overhaul · 2573fe70
      Brian Anderson 提交于
      This replaces the make-based test runner with a set of Rust-based test
      runners. I believe that all existing functionality has been
      preserved. The primary objective is to dogfood the Rust test
      framework.
      
      A few main things happen here:
      
      1) The run-pass/lib-* tests are all moved into src/test/stdtest. This
      is a standalone test crate intended for all standard library tests. It
      compiles to build/test/stdtest.stageN.
      
      2) rustc now compiles into yet another build artifact, this one a test
      runner that runs any tests contained directly in the rustc crate. This
      allows much more fine-grained unit testing of the compiler. It
      compiles to build/test/rustctest.stageN.
      
      3) There is a new custom test runner crate at src/test/compiletest
      that reproduces all the functionality for running the compile-fail,
      run-fail, run-pass and bench tests while integrating with Rust's test
      framework. It compiles to build/test/compiletest.stageN.
      
      4) The build rules have been completely changed to use the new test
      runners, while also being less redundant, following the example of the
      recent stageN.mk rewrite.
      
      It adds two new features to the cfail/rfail/rpass/bench tests:
      
      1) Tests can specify multiple 'error-pattern' directives which must be
      satisfied in order.
      
      2) Tests can specify a 'compile-flags' directive which will make the
      test runner provide additional command line arguments to rustc.
      
      There are some downsides, the primary being that Rust has to be
      functioning pretty well just to run _any_ tests, which I imagine will
      be the source of some frustration when the entire test suite
      breaks. Will also cause some headaches during porting.
      
      Not having individual make rules, each rpass, etc test no longer
      remembers between runs whether it completed successfully. As a result,
      it's not possible to incrementally fix multiple tests by just running
      'make check', fixing a test, and repeating without re-running all the
      tests contained in the test runner. Instead you can filter just the
      tests you want to run by using the TESTNAME environment variable.
      
      This also dispenses with the ability to run stage0 tests, but they
      tended to be broken more often than not anyway.
      2573fe70
  4. 22 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 14 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 13 7月, 2011 3 次提交
  7. 08 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  8. 07 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • B
      Add a stdtest crate to hold the standard library tests · 2f7bc905
      Brian Anderson 提交于
      This will link to std and compile with the --test flag. Eventually the
      run-pass/lib* tests will move here.
      
      We could also put the std tests directly into the library and compile both a
      library version and a test version, but I think this way will make for faster
      builds.
      
      Issue #428
      2f7bc905
  9. 06 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • B
      Temporarily introduce a stage2-check build target · 6853e04f
      Brian Anderson 提交于
      The tinderbox snapshotting scripts seem to be looking for a stage2-check
      target when they should be using check-stage2. Since Graydon is out of the
      office, I'm making this change to see if the snapshot will go through.
      6853e04f
  10. 30 6月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 29 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 26 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 17 6月, 2011 2 次提交
  14. 15 6月, 2011 3 次提交
  15. 09 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 08 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  17. 28 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  18. 25 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 12 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  20. 09 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  21. 05 5月, 2011 2 次提交
  22. 04 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 02 5月, 2011 1 次提交