1. 04 5月, 2020 6 次提交
  2. 03 5月, 2020 2 次提交
  3. 02 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  4. 30 4月, 2020 4 次提交
  5. 29 4月, 2020 2 次提交
    • B
      document stable counterparts of intrinsics · 827d6f6c
      Bastian Kauschke 提交于
      827d6f6c
    • C
      safety-ptr: Add SAFETY on some unsafe blocks from libcore/ptr · 8558ccd5
      cohenarthur 提交于
      Add documentation example to slice_from_raw_parts_mut()
      Add SAFETY explanations to some unsafe blocks in libcore/ptr
      
      * libcore/ptr/mod.rs
      * libcore/ptr/unique.rs
      * libcore/ptr/non_null.rs
      
      safety-mod.rs: Add SAFETY to slice_from_raw_parts(),
      slice_from_raw_parts_mut()
      
      slice_from_raw_parts_mut: Add documentation example
      
      safety-ptr-unique.rs: Add SAFETY to new() and cast()
      
      safety-ptr-non_null.rs: Add SAFETY to new()
      
      safety-ptr-non_null.rs: Add SAFETY to cast()
      
      safety-ptr-non_null.rs: Add SAFETY to from() impls
      
      safety-ptr-unique.rs: Add SAFETY to from() impls
      
      safety-ptr-non_null.rs: Add SAFETY to new()
      
      safety-ptr-unique.rs: Add SAFETY to new()
      
      safety-ptr-mod.rs: Fix safety explanation
      
      https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/71507#discussion_r414488884
      
      safety-prt-non_null.rs: Fix SAFETY comment syntax
      
      safety-ptr-unique.rs: Fix syntax for empty()
      
      safety-ptr-non_null.rs: Fix misuse of non-null for align_of()
      
      safety-ptr-non_null.rs: Remove incorrect SAFETY comment
      
      safety-ptr-unique.rs: Remove unsound SAFETY comment
      
      safety-ptr-mod.rs: Add std comment on slice_from_raw_parts guarantee
      
      safety-ptr-unique.rs: Remove incorrect safety comment
      
      Creating a Unique from a NonNull has strict guarantees that the current
      implementation does not guarantee
      
      https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/71507#discussion_r415035952
      
      safety-ptr: Re-adding ignore-tidy directive
      8558ccd5
  6. 28 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 27 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  8. 26 4月, 2020 2 次提交
  9. 25 4月, 2020 2 次提交
  10. 24 4月, 2020 6 次提交
  11. 23 4月, 2020 7 次提交
  12. 22 4月, 2020 1 次提交
    • J
      Don't fuse Chain in its second iterator · eeb687f2
      Josh Stone 提交于
      Only the "first" iterator is actually set `None` when exhausted,
      depending on whether you iterate forward or backward. This restores
      behavior similar to the former `ChainState`, where it would transition
      from `Both` to `Front`/`Back` and only continue from that side.
      
      However, if you mix directions, then this may still set both sides to
      `None`, totally fusing the iterator.
      eeb687f2
  13. 21 4月, 2020 5 次提交