未验证 提交 b0bec955 编写于 作者: D Dylan DPC 提交者: GitHub

Rollup merge of #83486 - Aaron1011:fix/global-alloc-error, r=petrochenkov

Don't ICE when using `#[global_alloc]` on a non-item statement

Fixes #83469

We need to return an `Annotatable::Stmt` if we were passed an
`Annotatable::Stmt`
......@@ -14,31 +14,31 @@ pub fn expand(
ecx: &mut ExtCtxt<'_>,
_span: Span,
meta_item: &ast::MetaItem,
mut item: Annotatable,
item: Annotatable,
) -> Vec<Annotatable> {
check_builtin_macro_attribute(ecx, meta_item, sym::global_allocator);
let not_static = |item: Annotatable| {
let orig_item = item.clone();
let not_static = || {
ecx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic.span_err(item.span(), "allocators must be statics");
vec![item]
vec![orig_item.clone()]
};
let orig_item = item.clone();
let mut is_stmt = false;
// Allow using `#[global_allocator]` on an item statement
if let Annotatable::Stmt(stmt) = &item {
if let StmtKind::Item(item_) = &stmt.kind {
item = Annotatable::Item(item_.clone());
is_stmt = true;
}
}
let item = match item {
// FIXME - if we get deref patterns, use them to reduce duplication here
let (item, is_stmt) = match &item {
Annotatable::Item(item) => match item.kind {
ItemKind::Static(..) => item,
_ => return not_static(Annotatable::Item(item)),
ItemKind::Static(..) => (item, false),
_ => return not_static(),
},
Annotatable::Stmt(stmt) => match &stmt.kind {
StmtKind::Item(item_) => match item_.kind {
ItemKind::Static(..) => (item_, true),
_ => return not_static(),
},
_ => return not_static(),
},
_ => return not_static(item),
_ => return not_static(),
};
// Generate a bunch of new items using the AllocFnFactory
......
// Regression test for issue #83469
// Ensures that we recover from `#[global_alloc]` on an invalid
// stmt without an ICE
fn outer() {
#[global_allocator]
fn inner() {} //~ ERROR allocators must be statics
}
fn main() {}
error: allocators must be statics
--> $DIR/issue-83469-global-alloc-invalid-stmt.rs:7:5
|
LL | fn inner() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册