提交 7c01e6c3 编写于 作者: M Mara Bos

Derive Debug for io::Chain instead of manually implementing it.

The manual implementation has the same bounds, so I don't think there's
any reason for a manual implementation. The names used in the derive
implementation are even nicer (`first`/`second`) than the manual
implementation (`t`/`u`), and include the `done_first` field too.
上级 feaac19f
......@@ -2114,6 +2114,7 @@ fn lines(self) -> Lines<Self>
///
/// [`chain`]: Read::chain
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct Chain<T, U> {
first: T,
second: U,
......@@ -2195,13 +2196,6 @@ pub fn get_mut(&mut self) -> (&mut T, &mut U) {
}
}
#[stable(feature = "std_debug", since = "1.16.0")]
impl<T: fmt::Debug, U: fmt::Debug> fmt::Debug for Chain<T, U> {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
f.debug_struct("Chain").field("t", &self.first).field("u", &self.second).finish()
}
}
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
impl<T: Read, U: Read> Read for Chain<T, U> {
fn read(&mut self, buf: &mut [u8]) -> Result<usize> {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册