提交 5ad7afc2 编写于 作者: B bors

auto merge of #16717 : tshepang/rust/misplaced-comma, r=pcwalton

Also:

* Remove unseeming repetition.
* By now, the reader has already heard that Rust is safe by default, so
reduce the overlong sentence, making it easier to read.
......@@ -5531,9 +5531,9 @@ There are two circumstances where Rust's safety provisions don't work well.
The first is when interfacing with C code, and the second is when building
certain kinds of abstractions.
Rust has support for FFI, (which you can read about in the [FFI
Guide](guide-ffi.html)) but Rust can't guarantee that the C code will be safe,
like Rust's will. Therefore, Rust marks such functions with the `unsafe`
Rust has support for FFI (which you can read about in the [FFI
Guide](guide-ffi.html)), but can't guarantee that the C code will be safe.
Therefore, Rust marks such functions with the `unsafe`
keyword, which indicates that the function may not behave properly.
Second, if you'd like to create some sort of shared-memory data structure, Rust
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册