Rollup merge of #81333 - RalfJung:const-err-simplify, r=oli-obk

clean up some const error reporting around promoteds

These are some error reporting simplifications enabled by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80579.

Further simplifications are possible but could be blocked on making `const_err` a hard error.

r? ``````@oli-obk``````

compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift/src/constant.rs

@@ -134,11 +134,9 @@ pub(crate) fn codegen_constant<'tcx>(
             {
                 Ok(const_val) => const_val,
                 Err(_) => {
-                    if promoted.is_none() {
-                        fx.tcx
-                            .sess
-                            .span_err(constant.span, "erroneous constant encountered");
-                    }
+                    fx.tcx
+                        .sess
+                        .span_err(constant.span, "erroneous constant encountered");
                     return crate::trap::trap_unreachable_ret_value(
                         fx,
                         fx.layout_of(const_.ty),

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/constant.rs

@@ -30,12 +30,7 @@ pub fn eval_mir_constant(
                 .tcx()
                 .const_eval_resolve(ty::ParamEnv::reveal_all(), def, substs, promoted, None)
                 .map_err(|err| {
-                    if promoted.is_none() {
-                        self.cx
-                            .tcx()
-                            .sess
-                            .span_err(constant.span, "erroneous constant encountered");
-                    }
+                    self.cx.tcx().sess.span_err(constant.span, "erroneous constant encountered");
                     err
                 }),
             ty::ConstKind::Value(value) => Ok(value),

compiler/rustc_mir/src/const_eval/eval_queries.rs

@@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ pub fn eval_to_allocation_raw_provider<'tcx>(
         tcx.def_span(def.did),
         key.param_env,
         CompileTimeInterpreter::new(tcx.sess.const_eval_limit()),
+        // Statics (and promoteds inside statics) may access other statics, because unlike consts
+        // they do not have to behave "as if" they were evaluated at runtime.
         MemoryExtra { can_access_statics: is_static },
     );
 
@@ -305,83 +307,35 @@ pub fn eval_to_allocation_raw_provider<'tcx>(
     match res.and_then(|body| eval_body_using_ecx(&mut ecx, cid, &body)) {
         Err(error) => {
             let err = ConstEvalErr::new(&ecx, error, None);
-            // errors in statics are always emitted as fatal errors
-            if is_static {
-                // Ensure that if the above error was either `TooGeneric` or `Reported`
-                // an error must be reported.
-                let v = err.report_as_error(
-                    ecx.tcx.at(ecx.cur_span()),
-                    "could not evaluate static initializer",
-                );
-
-                // If this is `Reveal:All`, then we need to make sure an error is reported but if
-                // this is `Reveal::UserFacing`, then it's expected that we could get a
-                // `TooGeneric` error. When we fall back to `Reveal::All`, then it will either
-                // succeed or we'll report this error then.
-                if key.param_env.reveal() == Reveal::All {
-                    tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(
-                        err.span,
-                        &format!("static eval failure did not emit an error: {:#?}", v),
-                    );
-                }
-
-                Err(v)
-            } else if let Some(def) = def.as_local() {
-                // constant defined in this crate, we can figure out a lint level!
-                match tcx.def_kind(def.did.to_def_id()) {
-                    // constants never produce a hard error at the definition site. Anything else is
-                    // a backwards compatibility hazard (and will break old versions of winapi for
-                    // sure)
-                    //
-                    // note that validation may still cause a hard error on this very same constant,
-                    // because any code that existed before validation could not have failed
-                    // validation thus preventing such a hard error from being a backwards
-                    // compatibility hazard
-                    DefKind::Const | DefKind::AssocConst => {
-                        let hir_id = tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(def.did);
-                        Err(err.report_as_lint(
-                            tcx.at(tcx.def_span(def.did)),
-                            "any use of this value will cause an error",
-                            hir_id,
-                            Some(err.span),
-                        ))
-                    }
-                    // promoting runtime code is only allowed to error if it references broken
-                    // constants any other kind of error will be reported to the user as a
-                    // deny-by-default lint
-                    _ => {
-                        if let Some(p) = cid.promoted {
-                            let span = tcx.promoted_mir_opt_const_arg(def.to_global())[p].span;
-                            if let err_inval!(ReferencedConstant) = err.error {
-                                Err(err.report_as_error(
-                                    tcx.at(span),
-                                    "evaluation of constant expression failed",
-                                ))
-                            } else {
-                                Err(err.report_as_lint(
-                                    tcx.at(span),
-                                    "reaching this expression at runtime will panic or abort",
-                                    tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(def.did),
-                                    Some(err.span),
-                                ))
-                            }
-                        // anything else (array lengths, enum initializers, constant patterns) are
-                        // reported as hard errors
-                        } else {
-                            Err(err.report_as_error(
-                                ecx.tcx.at(ecx.cur_span()),
-                                "evaluation of constant value failed",
-                            ))
-                        }
-                    }
-                }
+            // Some CTFE errors raise just a lint, not a hard error; see
+            // <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800>.
+            let emit_as_lint = if let Some(def) = def.as_local() {
+                // (Associated) consts only emit a lint, since they might be unused.
+                matches!(tcx.def_kind(def.did.to_def_id()), DefKind::Const | DefKind::AssocConst)
             } else {
-                // use of broken constant from other crate
-                Err(err.report_as_error(ecx.tcx.at(ecx.cur_span()), "could not evaluate constant"))
+                // use of broken constant from other crate: always an error
+                false
+            };
+            if emit_as_lint {
+                let hir_id = tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(def.as_local().unwrap().did);
+                Err(err.report_as_lint(
+                    tcx.at(tcx.def_span(def.did)),
+                    "any use of this value will cause an error",
+                    hir_id,
+                    Some(err.span),
+                ))
+            } else {
+                let msg = if is_static {
+                    "could not evaluate static initializer"
+                } else {
+                    "evaluation of constant value failed"
+                };
+                Err(err.report_as_error(ecx.tcx.at(ecx.cur_span()), msg))
             }
         }
         Ok(mplace) => {
-            // Since evaluation had no errors, valiate the resulting constant:
+            // Since evaluation had no errors, validate the resulting constant.
+            // This is a separate `try` block to provide more targeted error reporting.
             let validation = try {
                 let mut ref_tracking = RefTracking::new(mplace);
                 let mut inner = false;
@@ -399,7 +353,7 @@ pub fn eval_to_allocation_raw_provider<'tcx>(
                 }
             };
             if let Err(error) = validation {
-                // Validation failed, report an error
+                // Validation failed, report an error. This is always a hard error.
                 let err = ConstEvalErr::new(&ecx, error, None);
                 Err(err.struct_error(
                     ecx.tcx,

src/test/ui/associated-consts/defaults-not-assumed-fail.rs

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ impl Tr for u32 {
 fn main() {
     assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::A, 255);
     assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::B, 0);    // causes the error above
-    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant expression failed
+    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
     //~| ERROR erroneous constant used
 
     assert_eq!(<u8 as Tr>::A, 254);

src/test/ui/associated-consts/defaults-not-assumed-fail.stderr

@@ -8,15 +8,11 @@ LL |     const B: u8 = Self::A + 1;
    |
    = note: `#[deny(const_err)]` on by default
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
-  --> $DIR/defaults-not-assumed-fail.rs:33:5
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
+  --> $DIR/defaults-not-assumed-fail.rs:33:16
    |
 LL |     assert_eq!(<() as Tr>::B, 0);    // causes the error above
-   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^-------------^^^^^
-   |                |
-   |                referenced constant has errors
-   |
-   = note: this error originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
+   |                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ referenced constant has errors
 
 error: erroneous constant used
   --> $DIR/defaults-not-assumed-fail.rs:33:5

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/conditional_array_execution.stderr

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
 LL | #![warn(const_err)]
    |         ^^^^^^^^^
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
   --> $DIR/conditional_array_execution.rs:11:20
    |
 LL |     println!("{}", FOO);

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/const-eval-query-stack.rs

@@ -21,6 +21,6 @@
 
 fn main() {
     let x: &'static i32 = &X;
-    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant expression failed
+    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
     println!("x={}", x);
 }

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/const-eval-query-stack.stderr

@@ -12,13 +12,11 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
 LL | #[warn(const_err)]
    |        ^^^^^^^^^
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
-  --> $DIR/const-eval-query-stack.rs:23:27
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
+  --> $DIR/const-eval-query-stack.rs:23:28
    |
 LL |     let x: &'static i32 = &X;
-   |                           ^-
-   |                            |
-   |                            referenced constant has errors
+   |                            ^ referenced constant has errors
 query stack during panic:
 #0 [normalize_generic_arg_after_erasing_regions] normalizing `main::promoted[1]`
 #1 [optimized_mir] optimizing MIR for `main`

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/const_fn_ptr_fail2.rs

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ const fn bar(x: fn(usize) -> usize, y: usize) -> usize {
 
 fn main() {
     assert_eq!(Y, 4);
-    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant expression failed
+    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
     assert_eq!(Z, 4);
-    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant expression failed
+    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
 }

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/const_fn_ptr_fail2.stderr

-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
-  --> $DIR/const_fn_ptr_fail2.rs:20:5
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
+  --> $DIR/const_fn_ptr_fail2.rs:20:16
    |
 LL |     assert_eq!(Y, 4);
-   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^-^^^^^
-   |                |
-   |                referenced constant has errors
-   |
-   = note: this error originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
+   |                ^ referenced constant has errors
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
-  --> $DIR/const_fn_ptr_fail2.rs:22:5
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
+  --> $DIR/const_fn_ptr_fail2.rs:22:16
    |
 LL |     assert_eq!(Z, 4);
-   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^-^^^^^
-   |                |
-   |                referenced constant has errors
-   |
-   = note: this error originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
+   |                ^ referenced constant has errors
 
 warning: skipping const checks
    |

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/issue-43197.rs

@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ fn main() {
     const Y: u32 = foo(0 - 1);
     //~^ WARN any use of this value will cause
     println!("{} {}", X, Y);
-    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant expression failed
-    //~| ERROR evaluation of constant expression failed
+    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
+    //~| ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
     //~| WARN erroneous constant used [const_err]
     //~| WARN erroneous constant used [const_err]
 }

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/issue-43197.stderr

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ LL |     const Y: u32 = foo(0 - 1);
    |                        |
    |                        attempt to compute `0_u32 - 1_u32`, which would overflow
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
   --> $DIR/issue-43197.rs:14:23
    |
 LL |     println!("{} {}", X, Y);
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ warning: erroneous constant used
 LL |     println!("{} {}", X, Y);
    |                       ^ referenced constant has errors
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
   --> $DIR/issue-43197.rs:14:26
    |
 LL |     println!("{} {}", X, Y);

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/issue-44578.rs

@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ impl Foo for u16 {
 
 fn main() {
     println!("{}", <Bar<u16, u8> as Foo>::AMT);
-    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant expression failed [E0080]
+    //~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed [E0080]
 }

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/issue-44578.stderr

-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
   --> $DIR/issue-44578.rs:27:20
    |
 LL |     println!("{}", <Bar<u16, u8> as Foo>::AMT);

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/issue-50814-2.stderr

@@ -8,13 +8,11 @@ LL |     const BAR: usize = [5, 6, 7][T::BOO];
    |
    = note: `#[deny(const_err)]` on by default
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
-  --> $DIR/issue-50814-2.rs:18:5
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
+  --> $DIR/issue-50814-2.rs:18:6
    |
 LL |     &<A<T> as Foo<T>>::BAR
-   |     ^---------------------
-   |      |
-   |      referenced constant has errors
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ referenced constant has errors
 
 error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
 

src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/issue-50814.stderr

@@ -8,13 +8,11 @@ LL |     const MAX: u8 = A::MAX + B::MAX;
    |
    = note: `#[deny(const_err)]` on by default
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
-  --> $DIR/issue-50814.rs:20:5
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
+  --> $DIR/issue-50814.rs:20:6
    |
 LL |     &Sum::<U8,U8>::MAX
-   |     ^-----------------
-   |      |
-   |      referenced constant has errors
+   |      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ referenced constant has errors
 
 error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
 

src/test/ui/consts/const_unsafe_unreachable_ub.stderr

@@ -20,15 +20,11 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
 LL | #[warn(const_err)]
    |        ^^^^^^^^^
 
-error[E0080]: evaluation of constant expression failed
-  --> $DIR/const_unsafe_unreachable_ub.rs:17:3
+error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
+  --> $DIR/const_unsafe_unreachable_ub.rs:17:14
    |
 LL |   assert_eq!(BAR, true);
-   |   ^^^^^^^^^^^---^^^^^^^^
-   |              |
-   |              referenced constant has errors
-   |
-   = note: this error originates in a macro (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
+   |              ^^^ referenced constant has errors
 
 error: erroneous constant used
   --> $DIR/const_unsafe_unreachable_ub.rs:17:3

src/test/ui/consts/issue-55878.stderr

@@ -2,15 +2,12 @@ error[E0080]: values of the type `[u8; SIZE]` are too big for the current archit
   --> $SRC_DIR/core/src/mem/mod.rs:LL:COL
    |
 LL |     intrinsics::size_of::<T>()
-   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-   |     |
-   |     inside `std::mem::size_of::<[u8; SIZE]>` at $SRC_DIR/core/src/mem/mod.rs:LL:COL
-   |     inside `main` at $DIR/issue-55878.rs:7:26
+   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ inside `std::mem::size_of::<[u8; SIZE]>` at $SRC_DIR/core/src/mem/mod.rs:LL:COL
    | 
   ::: $DIR/issue-55878.rs:7:26
    |
 LL |     println!("Size: {}", std::mem::size_of::<[u8; u64::MAX as usize]>());
-   |                          ----------------------------------------------
+   |                          ---------------------------------------------- inside `main` at $DIR/issue-55878.rs:7:26
 
 error: erroneous constant used
   --> $DIR/issue-55878.rs:7:26