issue 166: master/slave sync with RDB > 2G.  cause: off_t defined as long. longs are 4-bytes on x64 Windows. Redefined impacted vars as int64_t.

Info about the replication state with the master added.

The new ROLE command is designed in order to provide a client with
informations about the replication in a fast and easy to use way
compared to the INFO command where the same information is also
available.

This commit adds peer ID caching in the client structure plus an API
change and the use of sdsMakeRoomFor() in order to improve the
reallocation pattern to generate the CLIENT LIST output.

Both the changes account for a very significant speedup.

Not updating slave acknowledgement time  when IOCP operation completes. breaks integration/replication-4 unit test.

Sometime an osx master with a Linux server over a slow link caused
a strange error where osx called the writable function for
the socket but actually apparently there was no room in the socket
buffer to accept the write: write(2) call returned an EAGAIN error,
that was not checked, so we considered write(2) == 0 always as a connection
reset, which was unfortunate since the bulk transfer has to start again.

Also more errors are logged with the WARNING level in the same code path
now.

Masters not understanding REPLCONF ACK will reply with errors to our
requests causing a number of possible issues.

This commit detects a global replication offest set to -1 at the end of
the replication, and marks the client representing the master with the
REDIS_PRE_PSYNC flag.

Note that this flag was called REDIS_PRE_PSYNC_SLAVE but now it is just
REDIS_PRE_PSYNC as it is used for both slaves and masters starting with
this commit.

This commit fixes issue #1488.

Currently replication offsets could be used into a limited way in order
to understand, out of a set of slaves, what is the one with the most
updated data. For example this comparison is possible of N slaves
were replicating all with the same master.

However the replication offset was not transferred from master to slaves
(that are later promoted as masters) in any way, so for instance if
there were three instances A, B, C, with A master and B and C
replication from A, the following could happen:

C disconnects from A.
B is turned into master.
A is switched to master of B.
B receives some write.

In this context there was no way to compare the offset of A and C,
because B would use its own local master replication offset as
replication offset to initialize the replication with A.

With this commit what happens is that when B is turned into master it
inherits the replication offset from A, making A and C comparable.
In the above case assuming no inconsistencies are created during the
disconnection and failover process, A will show to have a replication
offset greater than C.

Note that this does not mean offsets are always comparable to understand
what is, in a set of instances, since in more complex examples the
replica with the higher replication offset could be partitioned away
when picking the instance to elect as new master. However this in
general improves the ability of a system to try to pick a good replica
to promote to master.

The previous fix for false positive timeout detected by master was not
complete. There is another blocking stage while loading data for the
first synchronization with the master, that is, flushing away the
current data from the DB memory.

This commit uses the newly introduced dict.c callback in order to make
some incremental work (to send "\n" heartbeats to the master) while
flushing the old data from memory.

It is hard to write a regression test for this issue unfortunately. More
support for debugging in the Redis core would be needed in terms of
functionalities to simulate a slow DB loading / deletion.

Redis hash table implementation has many non-blocking features like
incremental rehashing, however while deleting a large hash table there
was no way to have a callback called to do some incremental work.

This commit adds this support, as an optiona callback argument to
dictEmpty() that is currently called at a fixed interval (one time every
65k deletions).

We now have replicationSetMaster() and replicationUnsetMaster() that can
be called in other contexts (for instance Redis Cluster).

Work in progress. Temporary move towards separate IOCP/non-IOCP builds because of thread state issues. Neither build set is particularily stable at the moment.

Sometimes when we resurrect a cached master after a successful partial
resynchronization attempt, there is pending data in the output buffers
of the client structure representing the master (likely REPLCONF ACK
commands).

If we don't reinstall the write handler, it will never be installed
again by addReply*() family functions as they'll assume that if there is
already data pending, the write handler is already installed.

This bug caused some slaves after a successful partial sync to never
send REPLCONF ACK, and continuously being detected as timing out by the
master, with a disconnection / reconnection loop.

There was a bug that over-esteemed the amount of backlog available,
however this could only happen when a slave was asking for an offset
that was in the "future" compared to the master replication backlog.

Now this case is handled well and logged as an incident in the master
log file.

The previous code using a static buffer as an optimization was lame:

1) Premature optimization, actually it was *slower* than naive code
   because resulted into the creation / destruction of the object
   encapsulating the output buffer.
2) The code was very hard to test, since it was needed to have specific
   tests for command lines exceeding the size of the static buffer.
3) As a result of "2" the code was bugged as the current tests were not
   able to stress specific corner cases.

It was replaced with easy to understand code that is safer and faster.

This fixes issue #1221.

Clients using SYNC to replicate are older implementations, such as
redis-cli --slave, and are not designed to acknowledge the master with
REPLCONF ACK commands, so we don't have any feedback and should not
disconnect them on timeout.

This commit uses the Replication Script Cache in order to avoid
translating EVALSHA into EVAL whenever possible for both the AOF and
slaves.

This code is only responsible to take an LRU-evicted fixed length cache
of SHA1 that we are sure all the slaves received.

In this commit only the implementation is provided, but the Redis core
does not use it to actually send EVALSHA to slaves when possible.