提交 993e0ede 编写于 作者: A antirez

SDIFF iterator misuse fixed in diff algorithm #1.

The bug could be easily triggered by:

    SADD foo a b c 1 2 3 4 5 6
    SDIFF foo foo

When the key was the same in two sets, an unsafe iterator was used to
check existence of elements in the same set we were iterating.
Usually this would just result into a wrong output, however with the
dict.c API misuse protection we have in place, the result was actually
an assertion failed that was triggered by the CI test, while creating
random datasets for the "MASTER and SLAVE consistency" test.
上级 2507e366
......@@ -825,6 +825,7 @@ void sunionDiffGenericCommand(redisClient *c, robj **setkeys, int setnum, robj *
while((ele = setTypeNextObject(si)) != NULL) {
for (j = 1; j < setnum; j++) {
if (!sets[j]) continue; /* no key is an empty set. */
if (sets[j] == sets[0]) break; /* same set! */
if (setTypeIsMember(sets[j],ele)) break;
}
if (j == setnum) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册