1. 05 9月, 2006 2 次提交
  2. 01 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • S
      [GFS2] Update copyright, tidy up incore.h · e9fc2aa0
      Steven Whitehouse 提交于
      As per comments from Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> this
      updates the copyright message to say "version" in full rather than
      "v.2". Also incore.h has been updated to remove forward structure
      declarations which are not required.
      
      The gfs2_quota_lvb structure has now had endianess annotations added
      to it. Also quota.c has been updated so that we now store the
      lvb data locally in endian independant format to avoid needing
      a structure in host endianess too. As a result the endianess
      conversions are done as required at various points and thus the
      conversion routines in lvb.[ch] are no longer required. I've
      moved the one remaining constant in lvb.h thats used into lm.h
      and removed the unused lvb.[ch].
      
      I have not changed the HIF_ constants. That is left to a later patch
      which I hope will unify the gh_flags and gh_iflags fields of the
      struct gfs2_holder.
      
      Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      e9fc2aa0
  3. 19 5月, 2006 1 次提交
  4. 21 4月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      [GFS2] journal recovery patch · c63e31c2
      David Teigland 提交于
      This is one of the changes related to journal recovery I mentioned a
      couple weeks ago.  We can get into a situation where there are only
      readonly nodes currently mounting the fs, but there are journals that need
      to be recovered.  Since the readonly nodes can't recover journals, the
      next rw mounter needs to go through and check all journals and recover any
      that are dirty (i.e. what the first node to mount the fs does).  This rw
      mounter needs to skip the journals held by the existing readonly nodes.
      Skipping those journals amounts to using the TRY flag on the journal locks
      so acquiring the lock of a journal held by a readonly node will fail
      instead of blocking indefinately.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
      c63e31c2
  5. 17 1月, 2006 1 次提交