1. 11 9月, 2011 3 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: skip locking if searching the commit root in csum lookup · ddf23b3f
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      It's not enough to just search the commit root, since we could be cow'ing the
      very block we need to search through, which would mean that its locked and we'll
      still deadlock.  So use path->skip_locking as well.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      ddf23b3f
    • S
      btrfs: fix warning in iput for bad-inode · e0b6d65b
      Sergei Trofimovich 提交于
      iput() shouldn't be called for inodes in I_NEW state.
      We need to mark inode as constructed first.
      
      WARNING: at fs/inode.c:1309 iput+0x20b/0x210()
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff8103e7ba>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7a/0xb0
       [<ffffffff8103e805>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
       [<ffffffff810eaf0b>] iput+0x20b/0x210
       [<ffffffff811b96fb>] btrfs_iget+0x1eb/0x4a0
       [<ffffffff811c3ad6>] btrfs_run_defrag_inodes+0x136/0x210
       [<ffffffff811ad55f>] cleaner_kthread+0x17f/0x1a0
       [<ffffffff81035b7d>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xd0
       [<ffffffff811ad3e0>] ? transaction_kthread+0x280/0x280
       [<ffffffff8105af86>] kthread+0x96/0xa0
       [<ffffffff814336d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
       [<ffffffff8105aef0>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x190/0x190
       [<ffffffff814336d0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
      Signed-off-by: NSergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
      CC: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
      Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      CC: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      e0b6d65b
    • L
      Btrfs: fix an oops when deleting snapshots · 14c7cca7
      Liu Bo 提交于
      We can reproduce this oops via the following steps:
      
      $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb7
      $ mount /dev/sdb7 /mnt/btrfs
      $ for ((i=0; i<3; i++)); do btrfs sub snap /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/s_$i; done
      $ rm -fr /mnt/btrfs/*
      $ rm -fr /mnt/btrfs/*
      
      then we'll get
      ------------[ cut here ]------------
      kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:2264!
      [...]
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffffa05578c7>] btrfs_rmdir+0xf7/0x1b0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffff81150b95>] vfs_rmdir+0xa5/0xf0
       [<ffffffff81153cc3>] do_rmdir+0x123/0x140
       [<ffffffff81145ac7>] ? fput+0x197/0x260
       [<ffffffff810aecff>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0
       [<ffffffff81153d0d>] sys_unlinkat+0x2d/0x40
       [<ffffffff8147896b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      RIP  [<ffffffffa054f7b9>] btrfs_orphan_add+0x179/0x1a0 [btrfs]
      
      When it comes to btrfs_lookup_dentry, we may set a snapshot's inode->i_ino
      to BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID instead of BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID,
      while the snapshot's location.objectid remains unchanged.
      
      However, btrfs_ino() does not take this into account, and returns a wrong ino,
      and causes the oops.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      14c7cca7
  2. 18 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 17 8月, 2011 10 次提交
  4. 06 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 02 8月, 2011 25 次提交