1. 17 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  2. 15 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 07 2月, 2019 3 次提交
    • A
      y2038: add 64-bit time_t syscalls to all 32-bit architectures · 48166e6e
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      This adds 21 new system calls on each ABI that has 32-bit time_t
      today. All of these have the exact same semantics as their existing
      counterparts, and the new ones all have macro names that end in 'time64'
      for clarification.
      
      This gets us to the point of being able to safely use a C library
      that has 64-bit time_t in user space. There are still a couple of
      loose ends to tie up in various areas of the code, but this is the
      big one, and should be entirely uncontroversial at this point.
      
      In particular, there are four system calls (getitimer, setitimer,
      waitid, and getrusage) that don't have a 64-bit counterpart yet,
      but these can all be safely implemented in the C library by wrapping
      around the existing system calls because the 32-bit time_t they
      pass only counts elapsed time, not time since the epoch. They
      will be dealt with later.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Acked-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      48166e6e
    • A
      y2038: rename old time and utime syscalls · d33c577c
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      The time, stime, utime, utimes, and futimesat system calls are only
      used on older architectures, and we do not provide y2038 safe variants
      of them, as they are replaced by clock_gettime64, clock_settime64,
      and utimensat_time64.
      
      However, for consistency it seems better to have the 32-bit architectures
      that still use them call the "time32" entry points (leaving the
      traditional handlers for the 64-bit architectures), like we do for system
      calls that now require two versions.
      
      Note: We used to always define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_TIME and
      __ARCH_WANT_SYS_UTIME and only set __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_TIME and
      __ARCH_WANT_SYS_UTIME32 for compat mode on 64-bit kernels. Now this is
      reversed: only 64-bit architectures set __ARCH_WANT_SYS_TIME/UTIME, while
      we need __ARCH_WANT_SYS_TIME32/UTIME32 for 32-bit architectures and compat
      mode. The resulting asm/unistd.h changes look a bit counterintuitive.
      
      This is only a cleanup patch and it should not change any behavior.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Acked-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      d33c577c
    • A
      y2038: use time32 syscall names on 32-bit · 00bf25d6
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      This is the big flip, where all 32-bit architectures set COMPAT_32BIT_TIME
      and use the _time32 system calls from the former compat layer instead
      of the system calls that take __kernel_timespec and similar arguments.
      
      The temporary redirects for __kernel_timespec, __kernel_itimerspec
      and __kernel_timex can get removed with this.
      
      It would be easy to split this commit by architecture, but with the new
      generated system call tables, it's easy enough to do it all at once,
      which makes it a little easier to check that the changes are the same
      in each table.
      Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      00bf25d6
  4. 26 1月, 2019 2 次提交
    • A
      arch: add pkey and rseq syscall numbers everywhere · b41c51c8
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system
      calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will.
      
      Only a few architectures are missing these, so just define them anyway
      for consistency. If we decide to add them later to one of these, the
      system call numbers won't get out of sync then.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Acked-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      b41c51c8
    • A
      ipc: rename old-style shmctl/semctl/msgctl syscalls · 275f2214
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      The behavior of these system calls is slightly different between
      architectures, as determined by the CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION
      symbol. Most architectures that implement the split IPC syscalls don't set
      that symbol and only get the modern version, but alpha, arm, microblaze,
      mips-n32, mips-n64 and xtensa expect the caller to pass the IPC_64 flag.
      
      For the architectures that so far only implement sys_ipc(), i.e. m68k,
      mips-o32, powerpc, s390, sh, sparc, and x86-32, we want the new behavior
      when adding the split syscalls, so we need to distinguish between the
      two groups of architectures.
      
      The method I picked for this distinction is to have a separate system call
      entry point: sys_old_*ctl() now uses ipc_parse_version, while sys_*ctl()
      does not. The system call tables of the five architectures are changed
      accordingly.
      
      As an additional benefit, we no longer need the configuration specific
      definition for ipc_parse_version(), it always does the same thing now,
      but simply won't get called on architectures with the modern interface.
      
      A small downside is that on architectures that do set
      ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION, we now have an extra set of entry points
      that are never called. They only add a few bytes of bloat, so it seems
      better to keep them compared to adding yet another Kconfig symbol.
      I considered adding new syscall numbers for the IPC_64 variants for
      consistency, but decided against that for now.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      275f2214
  5. 03 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • F
      xtensa: add system call table generation support · c7914ef6
      Firoz Khan 提交于
      The system call tables are in different format in all
      architecture and it will be difficult to manually add,
      modify or delete the syscall table entries in the res-
      pective files. To make it easy by keeping a script and
      which will generate the uapi header and syscall table
      file. This change will also help to unify the implemen-
      tation across all architectures.
      
      The system call table generation script is added in
      kernel/syscalls directory which contain the scripts to
      generate both uapi header file and system call table
      files. The syscall.tbl will be input for the scripts.
      
      syscall.tbl contains the list of available system calls
      along with system call number and corresponding entry
      point. Add a new system call in this architecture will
      be possible by adding new entry in the syscall.tbl file.
      
      Adding a new table entry consisting of:
        	- System call number.
      	- ABI.
      	- System call name.
      	- Entry point name.
      
      syscallhdr.sh and syscalltbl.sh will generate uapi header
      unistd_32.h and syscall_table.h files respectively. Both
      .sh files will parse the content syscall.tbl to generate
      the header and table files. unistd_32.h will be included
      by uapi/asm/unistd.h and syscall_table.h is included by
      kernel/syscall.c - the real system call table.
      
      ARM, s390 and x86 architecuture does have similar support.
      I leverage their implementation to come up with a generic
      solution.
      Signed-off-by: NFiroz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NMax Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
      c7914ef6