1. 22 10月, 2008 6 次提交
    • M
      dm: publish array_too_big · d63a5ce3
      Mikulas Patocka 提交于
      Move array_too_big to include/linux/device-mapper.h because it is
      used by targets.
      
      Remove the test from dm-raid1 as the number of mirror legs is limited
      such that it can never fail.  (Even for stripes it seems rather
      unlikely.)
      Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      d63a5ce3
    • M
      dm exception store: fix misordered writes · 7acedc5b
      Mikulas Patocka 提交于
      We must zero the next chunk on disk *before* writing out the current chunk, not
      after.  Otherwise if the machine crashes at the wrong time, the "end of metadata"
      marker may be missing.
      Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      7acedc5b
    • A
      dm exception store: refactor zero_area · 7c9e6c17
      Alasdair G Kergon 提交于
      Use a separate buffer for writing zeroes to the on-disk snapshot
      exception store, make the updating of ps->current_area explicit and
      refactor the code in preparation for the fix in the next patch.
      
      No functional change.
      Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      7c9e6c17
    • M
      dm snapshot: drop unused last_percent · f68d4f3d
      Mikulas Patocka 提交于
      The last_percent field is unused - remove it.
      (It dates from when events were triggered as each X% filled up.)
      Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      f68d4f3d
    • M
      dm snapshot: fix primary_pe race · 7c5f78b9
      Mikulas Patocka 提交于
      Fix a race condition with primary_pe ref_count handling.
      
      put_pending_exception runs under dm_snapshot->lock, it does atomic_dec_and_test
      on primary_pe->ref_count, and later does atomic_read primary_pe->ref_count.
      
      __origin_write does atomic_dec_and_test on primary_pe->ref_count without holding
      dm_snapshot->lock.
      
      This opens the following race condition:
      Assume two CPUs, CPU1 is executing put_pending_exception (and holding
      dm_snapshot->lock). CPU2 is executing __origin_write in parallel.
      primary_pe->ref_count == 2.
      
      CPU1:
      if (primary_pe && atomic_dec_and_test(&primary_pe->ref_count))
      	origin_bios = bio_list_get(&primary_pe->origin_bios);
      ... decrements primary_pe->ref_count to 1. Doesn't load origin_bios
      
      CPU2:
      if (first && atomic_dec_and_test(&primary_pe->ref_count)) {
      	flush_bios(bio_list_get(&primary_pe->origin_bios));
      	free_pending_exception(primary_pe);
      	/* If we got here, pe_queue is necessarily empty. */
      	return r;
      }
      ... decrements primary_pe->ref_count to 0, submits pending bios, frees
      primary_pe.
      
      CPU1:
      if (!primary_pe || primary_pe != pe)
      	free_pending_exception(pe);
      ... this has no effect.
      if (primary_pe && !atomic_read(&primary_pe->ref_count))
      	free_pending_exception(primary_pe);
      ... sees ref_count == 0 (written by CPU 2), does double free !!
      
      This bug can happen only if someone is simultaneously writing to both the
      origin and the snapshot.
      
      If someone is writing only to the origin, __origin_write will submit kcopyd
      request after it decrements primary_pe->ref_count (so it can't happen that the
      finished copy races with primary_pe->ref_count decrementation).
      
      If someone is writing only to the snapshot, __origin_write isn't invoked at all
      and the race can't happen.
      
      The race happens when someone writes to the snapshot --- this creates
      pending_exception with primary_pe == NULL and starts copying. Then, someone
      writes to the same chunk in the snapshot, and __origin_write races with
      termination of already submitted request in pending_complete (that calls
      put_pending_exception).
      
      This race may be reason for bugs:
        http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11636
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465825
      
      The patch fixes the code to make sure that:
      1. If atomic_dec_and_test(&primary_pe->ref_count) returns false, the process
      must no longer dereference primary_pe (because someone else may free it under
      us).
      2. If atomic_dec_and_test(&primary_pe->ref_count) returns true, the process
      is responsible for freeing primary_pe.
      Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      7c5f78b9
    • K
      dm kcopyd: avoid queue shuffle · b673c3a8
      Kazuo Ito 提交于
      Write throughput to LVM snapshot origin volume is an order
      of magnitude slower than those to LV without snapshots or
      snapshot target volumes, especially in the case of sequential
      writes with O_SYNC on.
      
      The following patch originally written by Kevin Jamieson and
      Jan Blunck and slightly modified for the current RCs by myself
      tries to improve the performance by modifying the behaviour
      of kcopyd, so that it pushes back an I/O job to the head of
      the job queue instead of the tail as process_jobs() currently
      does when it has to wait for free pages. This way, write
      requests aren't shuffled to cause extra seeks.
      
      I tested the patch against 2.6.27-rc5 and got the following results.
      The test is a dd command writing to snapshot origin followed by fsync
      to the file just created/updated.  A couple of filesystem benchmarks
      gave me similar results in case of sequential writes, while random
      writes didn't suffer much.
      
      dd if=/dev/zero of=<somewhere on snapshot origin> bs=4096 count=...
         [conv=notrunc when updating]
      
      1) linux 2.6.27-rc5 without the patch, write to snapshot origin,
      average throughput (MB/s)
                           10M     100M    1000M
      create,dd         511.46   610.72    11.81
      create,dd+fsync     7.10     6.77     8.13
      update,dd         431.63   917.41    12.75
      update,dd+fsync     7.79     7.43     8.12
      
      compared with write throughput to LV without any snapshots,
      all dd+fsync and 1000 MiB writes perform very poorly.
      
                           10M     100M    1000M
      create,dd         555.03   608.98   123.29
      create,dd+fsync   114.27    72.78    76.65
      update,dd         152.34  1267.27   124.04
      update,dd+fsync   130.56    77.81    77.84
      
      2) linux 2.6.27-rc5 with the patch, write to snapshot origin,
      average throughput (MB/s)
      
                           10M     100M    1000M
      create,dd         537.06   589.44    46.21
      create,dd+fsync    31.63    29.19    29.23
      update,dd         487.59   897.65    37.76
      update,dd+fsync    34.12    30.07    26.85
      
      Although still not on par with plain LV performance -
      cannot be avoided because it's copy on write anyway -
      this simple patch successfully improves throughtput
      of dd+fsync while not affecting the rest.
      Signed-off-by: NJan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NKazuo Ito <ito.kazuo@oss.ntt.co.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NAlasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      b673c3a8
  2. 21 10月, 2008 34 次提交