Since the dawn of time the ICST code has only supported divide
by one or hang in an eternal loop. Luckily we were always dividing
by one because the reference frequency for the systems using
the ICSTs is 24MHz and the [min,max] values for the PLL input
if [10,320] MHz for ICST307 and [6,200] for ICST525, so the loop
will always terminate immediately without assigning any divisor
for the reference frequency.

But for the code to make sense, let's insert the missing i++
Reported-by: NDavid Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

When trying to set the ICST 307 clock to 25174000 Hz I ran into
this arithmetic error: the icst_hz_to_vco() correctly figure out
DIVIDE=2, RDW=100 and VDW=99 yielding a frequency of
25174000 Hz out of the VCO. (I replicated the icst_hz() function
in a spreadsheet to verify this.)

However, when I called icst_hz() on these VCO settings it would
instead return 4122709 Hz. This causes an error in the common
clock driver for ICST as the common clock framework will call
.round_rate() on the clock which will utilize icst_hz_to_vco()
followed by icst_hz() suggesting the erroneous frequency, and
then the clock gets set to this.

The error did not manifest in the old clock framework since
this high frequency was only used by the CLCD, which calls
clk_set_rate() without first calling clk_round_rate() and since
the old clock framework would not call clk_round_rate() before
setting the frequency, the correct values propagated into
the VCO.

After some experimenting I figured out that it was due to a simple
arithmetic overflow: the divisor for 24Mhz reference frequency
as reference becomes 24000000*2*(99+8)=0x132212400 and the "1"
in bit 32 overflows and is lost.

But introducing an explicit 64-by-32 bit do_div() and casting
the divisor into (u64) we get the right frequency back, and the
right frequency gets set.

Tested on the ARM Versatile.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The patch below updates broken web addresses in the arch directory.
Signed-off-by: NJustin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMaciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Reviewed-by: NFinn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

The only difference between ICST307 and ICST525 are the two arrays
for calculating the S parameter; the code is now identical.  Merge
the two files and kill the duplicated code.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

This makes the ICST support fit more nicely with the clk API,
eliminating the need to *1000 and /1000 in places.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

These functions were originally implemented for the CLCD driver before
we had clk API support.  Since the CLCD driver does not use these
anymore, we can remove them.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

The structures for the ICST307 and ICST525 VCO devices are
identical, so merge them together.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

hi,

a quick find -iname \*.[ch] | xargs grep "> ARRAY_SIZE(", revealed
these in the icst drivers.
If i == ARRAY_SIZE, we get past the idx2s array.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!