- 22 4月, 2020 11 次提交
-
-
由 Jann Horn 提交于
remap_vmalloc_range() has had various issues with the bounds checks it promises to perform ("This function checks that addr is a valid vmalloc'ed area, and that it is big enough to cover the vma") over time, e.g.: - not detecting pgoff<<PAGE_SHIFT overflow - not detecting (pgoff<<PAGE_SHIFT)+usize overflow - not checking whether addr and addr+(pgoff<<PAGE_SHIFT) are the same vmalloc allocation - comparing a potentially wildly out-of-bounds pointer with the end of the vmalloc region In particular, since commit fc970227 ("bpf: Add mmap() support for BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY"), unprivileged users can cause kernel null pointer dereferences by calling mmap() on a BPF map with a size that is bigger than the distance from the start of the BPF map to the end of the address space. This could theoretically be used as a kernel ASLR bypass, by using whether mmap() with a given offset oopses or returns an error code to perform a binary search over the possible address range. To allow remap_vmalloc_range_partial() to verify that addr and addr+(pgoff<<PAGE_SHIFT) are in the same vmalloc region, pass the offset to remap_vmalloc_range_partial() instead of adding it to the pointer in remap_vmalloc_range(). In remap_vmalloc_range_partial(), fix the check against get_vm_area_size() by using size comparisons instead of pointer comparisons, and add checks for pgoff. Fixes: 83342314 ("[PATCH] mm: introduce remap_vmalloc_range()") Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200415222312.236431-1-jannh@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Hugh Dickins 提交于
Some optimizers don't notice that shmem_punch_compound() is always true (PageTransCompound() being false) without CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE==y. Use IS_ENABLED to help them to avoid the BUILD_BUG inside HPAGE_PMD_NR. Fixes: 71725ed1 ("mm: huge tmpfs: try to split_huge_page() when punching hole") Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.2004142339170.10035@eggly.anvilsSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Muchun Song 提交于
find_mergeable_vma() can return NULL. In this case, it leads to a crash when we access vm_mm(its offset is 0x40) later in write_protect_page. And this case did happen on our server. The following call trace is captured in kernel 4.19 with the following patch applied and KSM zero page enabled on our server. commit e86c59b1 ("mm/ksm: improve deduplication of zero pages with colouring") So add a vma check to fix it. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000040 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 9 PID: 510 Comm: ksmd Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE 4.19.36.bsk.9-amd64 #4.19.36.bsk.9 RIP: try_to_merge_one_page+0xc7/0x760 Code: 24 58 65 48 33 34 25 28 00 00 00 89 e8 0f 85 a3 06 00 00 48 83 c4 60 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 48 8b 46 08 a8 01 75 b8 <49> 8b 44 24 40 4c 8d 7c 24 20 b9 07 00 00 00 4c 89 e6 4c 89 ff 48 RSP: 0018:ffffadbdd9fffdb0 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffffda83ffd4be08 RBX: ffffda83ffd4be40 RCX: 0000002c6e800000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffda83ffd4be40 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffa11939f02ec0 R08: 0000000094e1a447 R09: 00000000abe76577 R10: 0000000000000962 R11: 0000000000004e6a R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffda83b1e06380 R14: ffffa18f31f072c0 R15: ffffda83ffd4be40 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa0da43b80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000040 CR3: 0000002c77c0a003 CR4: 00000000007626e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: ksm_scan_thread+0x115e/0x1960 kthread+0xf5/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [songmuchun@bytedance.com: if the vma is out of date, just exit] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416025034.29780-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com [akpm@linux-foundation.org: add the conventional braces, replace /** with /*] Fixes: e86c59b1 ("mm/ksm: improve deduplication of zero pages with colouring") Co-developed-by: NXiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416025034.29780-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200414132905.83819-1-songmuchun@bytedance.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 George Burgess IV 提交于
Clang has -Wself-assign enabled by default under -Wall, which always gets -Werror'ed on this file, causing sync-compare-and-swap to be disabled by default. The generally-accepted way to spell "this value is intentionally unused," is casting it to `void`. This is accepted by both GCC and Clang with -Wall enabled: https://godbolt.org/z/qqZ9r3Signed-off-by: NGeorge Burgess IV <gbiv@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200414195638.156123-1-gbiv@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Christophe JAILLET 提交于
Here, we look for function such as 'netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align', so a '_' is missing in the regex. To make sure: grep -r --include=*.c skbip_a * | wc ==> 0 results grep -r --include=*.c skb_ip_a * | wc ==> 112 results Signed-off-by: NChristophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200407190029.892-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.frSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Michal Hocko 提交于
EINTR is the usual error code which other killable interfaces return. This is the case for the other fatal_signal_pending break out from the same function. Make the code consistent. ERESTARTSYS is also quite confusing because the signal is fatal and so no restart will happen before returning to the userspace. Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200409071133.31734-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Longpeng 提交于
Our machine encountered a panic(addressing exception) after run for a long time and the calltrace is: RIP: hugetlb_fault+0x307/0xbe0 RSP: 0018:ffff9567fc27f808 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: e800c03ff1258d48 RBX: ffffd3bb003b69c0 RCX: e800c03ff1258d48 RDX: 17ff3fc00eda72b7 RSI: 00003ffffffff000 RDI: e800c03ff1258d48 RBP: ffff9567fc27f8c8 R08: e800c03ff1258d48 R09: 0000000000000080 R10: ffffaba0704c22a8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff95c87b4b60d8 R13: 00005fff00000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9567face8074 FS: 00007fe2d9ffb700(0000) GS:ffff956900e40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffd3bb003b69c0 CR3: 000000be67374000 CR4: 00000000003627e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: follow_hugetlb_page+0x175/0x540 __get_user_pages+0x2a0/0x7e0 __get_user_pages_unlocked+0x15d/0x210 __gfn_to_pfn_memslot+0x3c5/0x460 [kvm] try_async_pf+0x6e/0x2a0 [kvm] tdp_page_fault+0x151/0x2d0 [kvm] ... kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x330/0x490 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x309/0x6d0 [kvm] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3f0/0x540 SyS_ioctl+0xa1/0xc0 system_call_fastpath+0x22/0x27 For 1G hugepages, huge_pte_offset() wants to return NULL or pudp, but it may return a wrong 'pmdp' if there is a race. Please look at the following code snippet: ... pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr); if (sz != PUD_SIZE && pud_none(*pud)) return NULL; /* hugepage or swap? */ if (pud_huge(*pud) || !pud_present(*pud)) return (pte_t *)pud; pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); if (sz != PMD_SIZE && pmd_none(*pmd)) return NULL; /* hugepage or swap? */ if (pmd_huge(*pmd) || !pmd_present(*pmd)) return (pte_t *)pmd; ... The following sequence would trigger this bug: - CPU0: sz = PUD_SIZE and *pud = 0 , continue - CPU0: "pud_huge(*pud)" is false - CPU1: calling hugetlb_no_page and set *pud to xxxx8e7(PRESENT) - CPU0: "!pud_present(*pud)" is false, continue - CPU0: pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr) and maybe return a wrong pmdp However, we want CPU0 to return NULL or pudp in this case. We must make sure there is exactly one dereference of pud and pmd. Signed-off-by: NLongpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NMike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200413010342.771-1-longpeng2@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Bartosz Golaszewski 提交于
Kfifo has been written by Stefani Seibold and she's implicitly expected to Ack any changes to it. She's not however officially listed as kfifo maintainer which leads to delays in patch review. This patch proposes to add an explitic entry for kfifo to MAINTAINERS file. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: alphasort F: entries, per Joe] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove colon, per Bartosz] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200124174533.21815-1-brgl@bgdev.pl Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200413104250.26683-1-brgl@bgdev.plSigned-off-by: NBartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Acked-by: NStefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Peter Xu 提交于
Userfaultfd-wp is not yet working on 32bit hosts, but it's accidentally enabled previously. Disable it. Fixes: 5a281062 ("userfaultfd: wp: add WP pagetable tracking to x86") Reported-by: NNaresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: NNaresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200413141608.109211-1-peterx@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
Marco Elver reported system crashes when booting with "slub_debug=Z". The freepointer location (s->offset) was not taking into account that the "inuse" size that includes the redzone area should not be used by the freelist pointer. Change the calculation to save the area of the object that an inline freepointer may be written into. Fixes: 3202fa62 ("slub: relocate freelist pointer to middle of object") Reported-by: NMarco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: NMarco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/202004151054.BD695840@keescook Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200415164726.GA234932@google.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Masahiro Yamada 提交于
The closing parenthesis is missing. Fixes: bfeb022f ("mm/memory_hotplug: add pgprot_t to mhp_params") Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: NLogan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200413014743.16353-1-masahiroy@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 4月, 2020 12 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
-
由 Brian Geffon 提交于
When remapping a mapping where a portion of a VMA is remapped into another portion of the VMA it can cause the VMA to become split. During the copy_vma operation the VMA can actually be remerged if it's an anonymous VMA whose pages have not yet been faulted. This isn't normally a problem because at the end of the remap the original portion is unmapped causing it to become split again. However, MREMAP_DONTUNMAP leaves that original portion in place which means that the VMA which was split and then remerged is not actually split at the end of the mremap. This patch fixes a bug where we don't detect that the VMAs got remerged and we end up putting back VM_ACCOUNT on the next mapping which is completely unreleated. When that next mapping is unmapped it results in incorrectly unaccounting for the memory which was never accounted, and eventually we will underflow on the memory comittment. There is also another issue which is similar, we're currently accouting for the number of pages in the new_vma but that's wrong. We need to account for the length of the remap operation as that's all that is being added. If there was a mapping already at that location its comittment would have been adjusted as part of the munmap at the start of the mremap. A really simple repro can be seen in: https://gist.github.com/bgaff/e101ce99da7d9a8c60acc641d07f312c Fixes: e346b381 ("mm/mremap: add MREMAP_DONTUNMAP to mremap()") Reported-by: Nsyzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: NBrian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull clk fixes from Stephen Boyd: "Two build fixes for a couple clk drivers and a fix for the Unisoc serial clk where we want to keep it on for earlycon" * tag 'clk-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux: clk: sprd: don't gate uart console clock clk: mmp2: fix link error without mmp2 clk: asm9260: fix __clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy typo
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull x86 and objtool fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "A set of fixes for x86 and objtool: objtool: - Ignore the double UD2 which is emitted in BUG() when CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP is enabled. - Support clang non-section symbols in objtool ORC dump - Fix switch table detection in .text.unlikely - Make the BP scratch register warning more robust. x86: - Increase microcode maximum patch size for AMD to cope with new CPUs which have a larger patch size. - Fix a crash in the resource control filesystem when the removal of the default resource group is attempted. - Preserve Code and Data Prioritization enabled state accross CPU hotplug. - Update split lock cpu matching to use the new X86_MATCH macros. - Change the split lock enumeration as Intel finaly decided that the IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES bits are not architectural contrary to what the SDM claims. !@#%$^! - Add Tremont CPU models to the split lock detection cpu match. - Add a missing static attribute to make sparse happy" * tag 'x86-urgent-2020-04-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/split_lock: Add Tremont family CPU models x86/split_lock: Bits in IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES are not architectural x86/resctrl: Preserve CDP enable over CPU hotplug x86/resctrl: Fix invalid attempt at removing the default resource group x86/split_lock: Update to use X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL() x86/umip: Make umip_insns static x86/microcode/AMD: Increase microcode PATCH_MAX_SIZE objtool: Make BP scratch register warning more robust objtool: Fix switch table detection in .text.unlikely objtool: Support Clang non-section symbols in ORC generation objtool: Support Clang non-section symbols in ORC dump objtool: Fix CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP unreachable warnings
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull time namespace fix from Thomas Gleixner: "An update for the proc interface of time namespaces: Use symbolic names instead of clockid numbers. The usability nuisance of numbers was noticed by Michael when polishing the man page" * tag 'timers-urgent-2020-04-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: proc, time/namespace: Show clock symbolic names in /proc/pid/timens_offsets
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull perf tooling fixes and updates from Thomas Gleixner: - Fix the header line of perf stat output for '--metric-only --per-socket' - Fix the python build with clang - The usual tools UAPI header synchronization * tag 'perf-urgent-2020-04-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: tools headers: Synchronize linux/bits.h with the kernel sources tools headers: Adopt verbatim copy of compiletime_assert() from kernel sources tools headers: Update x86's syscall_64.tbl with the kernel sources tools headers UAPI: Sync drm/i915_drm.h with the kernel sources tools headers UAPI: Update tools's copy of drm.h headers tools headers kvm: Sync linux/kvm.h with the kernel sources tools headers UAPI: Sync linux/fscrypt.h with the kernel sources tools include UAPI: Sync linux/vhost.h with the kernel sources tools arch x86: Sync asm/cpufeatures.h with the kernel sources tools headers UAPI: Sync linux/mman.h with the kernel tools headers UAPI: Sync sched.h with the kernel tools headers: Update linux/vdso.h and grab a copy of vdso/const.h perf stat: Fix no metric header if --per-socket and --metric-only set perf python: Check if clang supports -fno-semantic-interposition tools arch x86: Sync the msr-index.h copy with the kernel sources
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull irq fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "A set of fixes/updates for the interrupt subsystem: - Remove setup_irq() and remove_irq(). All users have been converted so remove them before new users surface. - A set of bugfixes for various interrupt chip drivers - Add a few missing static attributes to address sparse warnings" * tag 'irq-urgent-2020-04-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1: Make bcm7038_l1_of_init() static irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu: Make legacy_bindings static irqchip/meson-gpio: Fix HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order irqchip/sifive-plic: Fix maximum priority threshold value irqchip/ti-sci-inta: Fix processing of masked irqs irqchip/mbigen: Free msi_desc on device teardown irqchip/gic-v4.1: Update effective affinity of virtual SGIs irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add support for VPENDBASER's Dirty+Valid signaling genirq: Remove setup_irq() and remove_irq()
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull scheduler fixes from Thomas Gleixner: "Two fixes for the scheduler: - Work around an uninitialized variable warning where GCC can't figure it out. - Allow 'isolcpus=' to skip unknown subparameters so that older kernels work with the commandline of a newer kernel. Improve the error output while at it" * tag 'sched-urgent-2020-04-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: sched/vtime: Work around an unitialized variable warning sched/isolation: Allow "isolcpus=" to skip unknown sub-parameters
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull RCU fix from Thomas Gleixner: "A single bugfix for RCU to prevent taking a lock in NMI context" * tag 'core-urgent-2020-04-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: rcu: Don't acquire lock in NMI handler in rcu_nmi_enter_common()
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o: "Miscellaneous bug fixes and cleanups for ext4, including a fix for generic/388 in data=journal mode, removing some BUG_ON's, and cleaning up some compiler warnings" * tag 'ext4_for_linus_stable' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: ext4: convert BUG_ON's to WARN_ON's in mballoc.c ext4: increase wait time needed before reuse of deleted inode numbers ext4: remove set but not used variable 'es' in ext4_jbd2.c ext4: remove set but not used variable 'es' ext4: do not zeroout extents beyond i_disksize ext4: fix return-value types in several function comments ext4: use non-movable memory for superblock readahead ext4: use matching invalidatepage in ext4_writepage
-
git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull cifs fixes from Steve French: "Three small smb3 fixes: two debug related (helping network tracing for SMB2 mounts, and the other removing an unintended debug line on signing failures), and one fixing a performance problem with 64K pages" * tag '5.7-rc-smb3-fixes' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6: smb3: remove overly noisy debug line in signing errors cifs: improve read performance for page size 64KB & cache=strict & vers=2.1+ cifs: dump the session id and keys also for SMB2 sessions
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Merge tag 'flexible-array-member-5.7-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux Pull flexible-array member conversion from Gustavo Silva: "The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member convertions) will also help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. Notice that all of these patches have been baking in linux-next for quite a while now and, 238 more of these patches have already been merged into 5.7-rc1. There are a couple hundred more of these issues waiting to be addressed in the whole codebase" [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") * tag 'flexible-array-member-5.7-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux: (28 commits) xattr.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member uapi: linux: fiemap.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member uapi: linux: dlm_device.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member tpm_eventlog.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member ti_wilink_st.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member swap.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member skbuff.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member sched: topology.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member rslib.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member rio.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member posix_acl.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member platform_data: wilco-ec.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member memcontrol.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member list_lru.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member lib: cpu_rmap: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member irq.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member ihex.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member igmp.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member genalloc.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member ethtool.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member ...
-
- 19 4月, 2020 17 次提交
-
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Pull SCSI fixes from James Bottomley: "Seven fixes: three in target, one on a sg error leg, two in qla2xxx fixing warnings introduced in the last merge window and updating MAINTAINERS and one in hisi_sas fixing a problem introduced by libata" * tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi: scsi: sg: add sg_remove_request in sg_common_write scsi: target: tcmu: reset_ring should reset TCMU_DEV_BIT_BROKEN scsi: target: fix PR IN / READ FULL STATUS for FC scsi: target: Write NULL to *port_nexus_ptr if no ISID scsi: MAINTAINERS: Update qla2xxx FC-SCSI driver maintainer scsi: qla2xxx: Fix regression warnings scsi: hisi_sas: Fix build error without SATA_HOST
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
-