To make the code more readable and to avoid the overhead of a function
call, let's get rid of a pair of the alternative function selectors and
explicitly call the VHE and non-VHE functions using the has_vhe() static
key based selector instead, telling the compiler to try to inline the
static function if it can.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We do not have to change the c15 trap setting on each switch to/from the
guest on VHE systems, because this setting only affects guest EL1/EL0
(and therefore not the VHE host).

The PMU and debug trap configuration can also be done on vcpu load/put
instead, because they don't affect how the VHE host kernel can access the
debug registers while executing KVM kernel code.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

There is no longer a need for an alternative to choose the right
function to tell us whether or not FPSIMD was enabled for the VM,
because we can simply can the appropriate functions directly from within
the _vhe and _nvhe run functions.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

As we are about to be more lazy with some of the trap configuration
register read/writes for VHE systems, move the logic that is currently
shared between VHE and non-VHE into a separate function which can be
called from either the world-switch path or from vcpu_load/vcpu_put.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

When running a 32-bit VM (EL1 in AArch32), the AArch32 system registers
can be deferred to vcpu load/put on VHE systems because neither
the host kernel nor host userspace uses these registers.

Note that we can't save DBGVCR32_EL2 conditionally based on the state of
the debug dirty flag on VHE after this change, because during
vcpu_load() we haven't calculated a valid debug flag yet, and when we've
restored the register during vcpu_load() we also have to save it during
vcpu_put().  This means that we'll always restore/save the register for
VHE on load/put, but luckily vcpu load/put are called rarely, so saving
an extra register unconditionally shouldn't significantly hurt
performance.

We can also not defer saving FPEXC32_32 because this register only holds
a guest-valid value for 32-bit guests during the exit path when the
guest has used FPSIMD registers and restored the register in the early
assembly handler from taking the EL2 fault, and therefore we have to
check if fpsimd is enabled for the guest in the exit path and save the
register then, for both VHE and non-VHE guests.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

32-bit registers are not used by a 64-bit host kernel and can be
deferred, but we need to rework the accesses to these register to access
the latest values depending on whether or not guest system registers are
loaded on the CPU or only reside in memory.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Some system registers do not affect the host kernel's execution and can
therefore be loaded when we are about to run a VCPU and we don't have to
restore the host state to the hardware before the time when we are
actually about to return to userspace or schedule out the VCPU thread.

The EL1 system registers and the userspace state registers only
affecting EL0 execution do not need to be saved and restored on every
switch between the VM and the host, because they don't affect the host
kernel's execution.

We mark all registers which are now deffered as such in the
vcpu_{read,write}_sys_reg accessors in sys-regs.c to ensure the most
up-to-date copy is always accessed.

Note MPIDR_EL1 (controlled via VMPIDR_EL2) is accessed from other vcpu
threads, for example via the GIC emulation, and therefore must be
declared as immediate, which is fine as the guest cannot modify this
value.

The 32-bit sysregs can also be deferred but we do this in a separate
patch as it requires a bit more infrastructure.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

ELR_EL1 is not used by a VHE host kernel and can be deferred, but we
need to rework the accesses to this register to access the latest value
depending on whether or not guest system registers are loaded on the CPU
or only reside in memory.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

SPSR_EL1 is not used by a VHE host kernel and can be deferred, but we
need to rework the accesses to this register to access the latest value
depending on whether or not guest system registers are loaded on the CPU
or only reside in memory.

The handling of accessing the various banked SPSRs for 32-bit VMs is a
bit clunky, but this will be improved in following patches which will
first prepare and subsequently implement deferred save/restore of the
32-bit registers, including the 32-bit SPSRs.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We are about to defer saving and restoring some groups of system
registers to vcpu_put and vcpu_load on supported systems.  This means
that we need some infrastructure to access system registes which
supports either accessing the memory backing of the register or directly
accessing the system registers, depending on the state of the system
when we access the register.

We do this by defining read/write accessor functions, which can handle
both "immediate" and "deferrable" system registers.  Immediate registers
are always saved/restored in the world-switch path, but deferrable
registers are only saved/restored in vcpu_put/vcpu_load when supported
and sysregs_loaded_on_cpu will be set in that case.

Note that we don't use the deferred mechanism yet in this patch, but only
introduce infrastructure.  This is to improve convenience of review in
the subsequent patches where it is clear which registers become
deferred.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Currently we access the system registers array via the vcpu_sys_reg()
macro.  However, we are about to change the behavior to some times
modify the register file directly, so let's change this to two
primitives:

 * Accessor macros vcpu_write_sys_reg() and vcpu_read_sys_reg()
 * Direct array access macro __vcpu_sys_reg()

The accessor macros should be used in places where the code needs to
access the currently loaded VCPU's state as observed by the guest.  For
example, when trapping on cache related registers, a write to a system
register should go directly to the VCPU version of the register.

The direct array access macro can be used in places where the VCPU is
known to never be running (for example userspace access) or for
registers which are never context switched (for example all the PMU
system registers).

This rewrites all users of vcpu_sys_regs to one of the macros described
above.

No functional change.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We currently handle 32-bit accesses to trapped VM system registers using
the 32-bit index into the coproc array on the vcpu structure, which is a
union of the coproc array and the sysreg array.

Since all the 32-bit coproc indices are created to correspond to the
architectural mapping between 64-bit system registers and 32-bit
coprocessor registers, and because the AArch64 system registers are the
double in size of the AArch32 coprocessor registers, we can always find
the system register entry that we must update by dividing the 32-bit
coproc index by 2.

This is going to make our lives much easier when we have to start
accessing system registers that use deferred save/restore and might
have to be read directly from the physical CPU.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

On non-VHE systems we need to save the ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 so that we can
return to the host in EL1 in the same state and location where we issued a
hypercall to EL2, but on VHE ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 are not useful because we
never enter a guest as a result of an exception entry that would be directly
handled by KVM. The kernel entry code already saves ELR_EL1/SPSR_EL1 on
exception entry, which is enough.  Therefore, factor out these registers into
separate save/restore functions, making it easy to exclude them from the VHE
world-switch path later on.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

There is no need to have multiple identical functions with different
names for saving host and guest state.  When saving and restoring state
for the host and guest, the state is the same for both contexts, and
that's why we have the kvm_cpu_context structure.  Delete one
version and rename the other into simply save/restore.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

The comment only applied to SPE on non-VHE systems, so we simply remove
it.
Suggested-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

As we are about to handle system registers quite differently between VHE
and non-VHE systems.  In preparation for that, we need to split some of
the handling functions between VHE and non-VHE functionality.

For now, we simply copy the non-VHE functions, but we do change the use
of static keys for VHE and non-VHE functionality now that we have
separate functions.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

As we are about to move calls around in the sysreg save/restore logic,
let's first rewrite the alternative function callers, because it is
going to make the next patches much easier to read.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

There's a semantic difference between the EL1 registers that control
operation of a kernel running in EL1 and EL1 registers that only control
userspace execution in EL0.  Since we can defer saving/restoring the
latter, move them into their own function.

The ARMv8 ARM (ARM DDI 0487C.a) Section D10.2.1 recommends that
ACTLR_EL1 has no effect on the processor when running the VHE host, and
we can therefore move this register into the EL1 state which is only
saved/restored on vcpu_put/load for a VHE host.

We also take this chance to rename the function saving/restoring the
remaining system register to make it clear this function deals with
the EL1 system registers.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

The VHE switch function calls __timer_enable_traps and
__timer_disable_traps which don't do anything on VHE systems.
Therefore, simply remove these calls from the VHE switch function and
make the functions non-conditional as they are now only called from the
non-VHE switch path.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

There is no need to reset the VTTBR to zero when exiting the guest on
VHE systems.  VHE systems don't use stage 2 translations for the EL2&0
translation regime used by the host.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

VHE kernels run completely in EL2 and therefore don't have a notion of
kernel and hyp addresses, they are all just kernel addresses.  Therefore
don't call kern_hyp_va() in the VHE switch function.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

So far this is mostly (see below) a copy of the legacy non-VHE switch
function, but we will start reworking these functions in separate
directions to work on VHE and non-VHE in the most optimal way in later
patches.

The only difference after this patch between the VHE and non-VHE run
functions is that we omit the branch-predictor variant-2 hardening for
QC Falkor CPUs, because this workaround is specific to a series of
non-VHE ARMv8.0 CPUs.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

The current world-switch function has functionality to detect a number
of cases where we need to fixup some part of the exit condition and
possibly run the guest again, before having restored the host state.

This includes populating missing fault info, emulating GICv2 CPU
interface accesses when mapped at unaligned addresses, and emulating
the GICv3 CPU interface on systems that need it.

As we are about to have an alternative switch function for VHE systems,
but VHE systems still need the same early fixup logic, factor out this
logic into a separate function that can be shared by both switch
functions.

No functional change.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Instead of having multiple calls from the world switch path to the debug
logic, each figuring out if the dirty bit is set and if we should
save/restore the debug registers, let's just provide two hooks to the
debug save/restore functionality, one for switching to the guest
context, and one for switching to the host context, and we get the
benefit of only having to evaluate the dirty flag once on each path,
plus we give the compiler some more room to inline some of this
functionality.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

The debug save/restore functions can be improved by using the has_vhe()
static key instead of the instruction alternative.  Using the static key
uses the same paradigm as we're going to use elsewhere, it makes the
code more readable, and it generates slightly better code (no
stack setups and function calls unless necessary).

We also use a static key on the restore path, because it will be
marginally faster than loading a value from memory.

Finally, we don't have to conditionally clear the debug dirty flag if
it's set, we can just clear it.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

There is no need to figure out inside the world-switch if we should
save/restore the debug registers or not, we might as well do that in the
higher level debug setup code, making it easier to optimize down the
line.
Reviewed-by: NJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We have numerous checks around that checks if the HCR_EL2 has the RW bit
set to figure out if we're running an AArch64 or AArch32 VM.  In some
cases, directly checking the RW bit (given its unintuitive name), is a
bit confusing, and that's not going to improve as we move logic around
for the following patches that optimize KVM on AArch64 hosts with VHE.

Therefore, introduce a helper, vcpu_el1_is_32bit, and replace existing
direct checks of HCR_EL2.RW with the helper.
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

As we are about to move a bunch of save/restore logic for VHE kernels to
the load and put functions, we need some infrastructure to do this.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We currently have a separate read-modify-write of the HCR_EL2 on entry
to the guest for the sole purpose of setting the VF and VI bits, if set.
Since this is most rarely the case (only when using userspace IRQ chip
and interrupts are in flight), let's get rid of this operation and
instead modify the bits in the vcpu->arch.hcr[_el2] directly when
needed.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We always set the IMO and FMO bits in the HCR_EL2 when running the
guest, regardless if we use the vgic or not.  By moving these flags to
HCR_GUEST_FLAGS we can avoid one of the extra save/restore operations of
HCR_EL2 in the world switch code, and we can also soon get rid of the
other one.

This is safe, because even though the IMO and FMO bits control both
taking the interrupts to EL2 and remapping ICC_*_EL1 to ICV_*_EL1 when
executed at EL1, as long as we ensure that these bits are clear when
running the EL1 host, we're OK, because we reset the HCR_EL2 to only
have the HCR_RW bit set when returning to EL1 on non-VHE systems.
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NShih-Wei Li <shihwei@cs.columbia.edu>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

VHE actually doesn't rely on clearing the VTTBR when returning to the
host kernel, and that is the current key mechanism of hyp_panic to
figure out how to attempt to return to a state good enough to print a
panic statement.

Therefore, we split the hyp_panic function into two functions, a VHE and
a non-VHE, keeping the non-VHE version intact, but changing the VHE
behavior.

The vttbr_el2 check on VHE doesn't really make that much sense, because
the only situation where we can get here on VHE is when the hypervisor
assembly code actually called into hyp_panic, which only happens when
VBAR_EL2 has been set to the KVM exception vectors.  On VHE, we can
always safely disable the traps and restore the host registers at this
point, so we simply do that unconditionally and call into the panic
function directly.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

We already have the percpu area for the host cpu state, which points to
the VCPU, so there's no need to store the VCPU pointer on the stack on
every context switch.  We can be a little more clever and just use
tpidr_el2 for the percpu offset and load the VCPU pointer from the host
context.

This has the benefit of being able to retrieve the host context even
when our stack is corrupted, and it has a potential performance benefit
because we trade a store plus a load for an mrs and a load on a round
trip to the guest.

This does require us to calculate the percpu offset without including
the offset from the kernel mapping of the percpu array to the linear
mapping of the array (which is what we store in tpidr_el1), because a
PC-relative generated address in EL2 is already giving us the hyp alias
of the linear mapping of a kernel address.  We do this in
__cpu_init_hyp_mode() by using kvm_ksym_ref().

The code that accesses ESR_EL2 was previously using an alternative to
use the _EL1 accessor on VHE systems, but this was actually unnecessary
as the _EL1 accessor aliases the ESR_EL2 register on VHE, and the _EL2
accessor does the same thing on both systems.

Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Moving the call to vcpu_load() in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() to after
we've called kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() simplifies some of the vgic and
there is also no need to do vcpu_load() for things such as handling the
immediate_exit flag.
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Calling vcpu_load() registers preempt notifiers for this vcpu and calls
kvm_arch_vcpu_load().  The latter will soon be doing a lot of heavy
lifting on arm/arm64 and will try to do things such as enabling the
virtual timer and setting us up to handle interrupts from the timer
hardware.

Loading state onto hardware registers and enabling hardware to signal
interrupts can be problematic when we're not actually about to run the
VCPU, because it makes it difficult to establish the right context when
handling interrupts from the timer, and it makes the register access
code difficult to reason about.

Luckily, now when we call vcpu_load in each ioctl implementation, we can
simply remove the call from the non-KVM_RUN vcpu ioctls, and our
kvm_arch_vcpu_load() is only used for loading vcpu content to the
physical CPU when we're actually going to run the vcpu.
Reviewed-by: NJulien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

In AArch64/AArch32, the virtual counter uses a fixed virtual offset
of zero in the following situations as per ARMv8 specifications:

1) HCR_EL2.E2H is 1, and CNTVCT_EL0/CNTVCT are read from EL2.
2) HCR_EL2.{E2H, TGE} is {1, 1}, and either:
   — CNTVCT_EL0 is read from Non-secure EL0 or EL2.
   — CNTVCT is read from Non-secure EL0.

So, no need to zero CNTVOFF_EL2/CNTVOFF for VHE case.
Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Acked-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NShanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Set the handlers to emulate read and write operations for CNTP_CTL,
CNTP_CVAL and CNTP_TVAL registers in such a way that VMs can use the
physical timer.
Signed-off-by: NJérémy Fanguède <j.fanguede@virtualopensystems.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

Some 32bits guest OS can use the CNTP timer, however KVM does not
handle the accesses, injecting a fault instead.

Use the proper handlers to emulate the EL1 Physical Timer (CNTP)
register accesses of AArch32 guests.
Signed-off-by: NJérémy Fanguède <j.fanguede@virtualopensystems.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlvise Rigo <a.rigo@virtualopensystems.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

The HCR_EL2.TID3 flag needs to be set when trapping guest access to
the CPU ID registers is required.  However, the decision about
whether to set this bit does not need to be repeated at every
switch to the guest.

Instead, it's sufficient to make this decision once and record the
outcome.

This patch moves the decision to vcpu_reset_hcr() and records the
choice made in vcpu->arch.hcr_el2.  The world switch code can then
load this directly when switching to the guest without the need for
conditional logic on the critical path.
Signed-off-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Suggested-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

We don't currently limit guest accesses to the LOR registers, which we
neither virtualize nor context-switch. As such, guests are provided with
unusable information/controls, and are not isolated from each other (or
the host).

To prevent these issues, we can trap register accesses and present the
illusion LORegions are unssupported by the CPU. To do this, we mask
ID_AA64MMFR1.LO, and set HCR_EL2.TLOR to trap accesses to the following
registers:

* LORC_EL1
* LOREA_EL1
* LORID_EL1
* LORN_EL1
* LORSA_EL1

... when trapped, we inject an UNDEFINED exception to EL1, simulating
their non-existence.

As noted in D7.2.67, when no LORegions are implemented, LoadLOAcquire
and StoreLORelease must behave as LoadAcquire and StoreRelease
respectively. We can ensure this by clearing LORC_EL1.EN when a CPU's
EL2 is first initialized, as the host kernel will not modify this.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>