Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 08 12月, 2008 2 次提交
  3. 06 12月, 2008 8 次提交
  5. 05 12月, 2008 21 次提交
  7. 04 12月, 2008 9 次提交
    • A
      x86: fix early panic with boot option "nosmp" · 9adc1386
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      Impact: fix boot crash with numcpus=0 on certain systems

Fix early exception in __get_smp_config with nosmp.

Bail out early when there is no MP table.
Reported-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      9adc1386
    • A
      [PATCH] fix bogus argument of blkdev_put() in pktcdvd · 2cbed890
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      final close of ->bdev should match the initial open, i.e.
get FMODE_READ | FMODE_NDELAY; FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE has
been a braino.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      2cbed890
    • C
      [PATCH 2/2] documnt FMODE_ constants · fc9161e5
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Make sure all FMODE_ constants are documents, and ensure a coherent
style for the already existing comments.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      fc9161e5
    • C
      [PATCH 1/2] kill FMODE_NDELAY_NOW · fd4ce1ac
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Update FMODE_NDELAY before each ioctl call so that we can kill the
magic FMODE_NDELAY_NOW.  It would be even better to do this directly
in setfl(), but for that we'd need to have FMODE_NDELAY for all files,
not just block special files.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      fd4ce1ac
    • C
      [PATCH] clean up blkdev_get a little bit · ebbefc01
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      The way the bd_claim for the FMODE_EXCL case is implemented is rather
confusing.  Clean it up to the most logical style.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      ebbefc01
    • A
      [PATCH] Fix block dev compat ioctl handling · 1c925604
      由 Andreas Schwab 提交于 
      Commit 33c2dca4 (trim file propagation
in block/compat_ioctl.c) removed the handling of some ioctls from
compat_blkdev_driver_ioctl.  That caused them to be rejected as unknown
by the compat layer.
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      1c925604
    • A
      [PATCH] kill obsolete temporary comment in swsusp_close() · 50c396d3
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      it had been put there to mark the call of blkdev_put() that
needed proper argument propagated to it; later patch in the
same series had done just that.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      50c396d3
    • J
      time: catch xtime_nsec underflows and fix them · 6c9bacb4
      由 john stultz 提交于 
      Impact: fix time warp bug

Alex Shi, along with Yanmin Zhang have been noticing occasional time
inconsistencies recently. Through their great diagnosis, they found that
the xtime_nsec value used in update_wall_time was occasionally going
negative. After looking through the code for awhile, I realized we have
the possibility for an underflow when three conditions are met in
update_wall_time():

  1) We have accumulated a second's worth of nanoseconds, so we
     incremented xtime.tv_sec and appropriately decrement xtime_nsec.
     (This doesn't cause xtime_nsec to go negative, but it can cause it
      to be small).

  2) The remaining offset value is large, but just slightly less then
     cycle_interval.

  3) clocksource_adjust() is speeding up the clock, causing a
     corrective amount (compensating for the increase in the multiplier
     being multiplied against the unaccumulated offset value) to be
     subtracted from xtime_nsec.

This can cause xtime_nsec to underflow.

Unfortunately, since we notify the NTP subsystem via second_overflow()
whenever we accumulate a full second, and this effects the error
accumulation that has already occured, we cannot simply revert the
accumulated second from xtime nor move the second accumulation to after
the clocksource_adjust call without a change in behavior.

This leaves us with (at least) two options:

1) Simply return from clocksource_adjust() without making a change if we
   notice the adjustment would cause xtime_nsec to go negative.

This would work, but I'm concerned that if a large adjustment was needed
(due to the error being large), it may be possible to get stuck with an
ever increasing error that becomes too large to correct (since it may
always force xtime_nsec negative). This may just be paranoia on my part.

2) Catch xtime_nsec if it is negative, then add back the amount its
   negative to both xtime_nsec and the error.

This second method is consistent with how we've handled earlier rounding
issues, and also has the benefit that the error being added is always in
the oposite direction also always equal or smaller then the correction
being applied. So the risk of a corner case where things get out of
control is lessened.

This patch fixes bug 11970, as tested by Yanmin Zhang
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11970

Reported-by: alex.shi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: NJohn Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: N"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: N"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      6c9bacb4
    • J
      sparc64: Fix VIS emulation bugs · 726c12f5
      由 Joseph Myers 提交于 
      This patch fixes some bugs in VIS emulation that cause the GCC test
failure

FAIL: gcc.target/sparc/pdist-3.c execution test

for both 32-bit and 64-bit testing on hardware lacking these
instructions.  The emulation code for the pdist instruction uses
RS1(insn) for both source registers rs1 and rs2, which is obviously
wrong and leads to the instruction doing nothing (the observed
problem), and further inspection of the code shows that RS1 uses a
shift of 24 and RD a shift of 25, which clearly cannot both be right;
examining SPARC documentation indicates the correct shift for RS1 is
14.

This patch fixes the bug if single-stepping over the affected
instruction in the debugger, but not if the testcase is run
standalone.  For that, Wind River has another patch I hope they will
send as a followup to this patch submission.
Signed-off-by: NJoseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      726c12f5