1. 19 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 26 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 03 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 10 4月, 2010 3 次提交
  5. 28 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  6. 13 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 17 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • R
      cpumask: rename tsk_cpumask to tsk_cpus_allowed · a4636818
      Rusty Russell 提交于
      Noone uses this wrapper yet, and Ingo asked that it be kept consistent
      with current task_struct usage.
      
      (One user crept in via linux-next: fixed)
      
      Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au.
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      a4636818
  8. 25 11月, 2009 2 次提交
    • T
      [ACPI/CPUFREQ] Introduce bios_limit per cpu cpufreq sysfs interface · e2f74f35
      Thomas Renninger 提交于
      This interface is mainly intended (and implemented) for ACPI _PPC BIOS
      frequency limitations, but other cpufreq drivers can also use it for
      similar use-cases.
      
      Why is this needed:
      
      Currently it's not obvious why cpufreq got limited.
      People see cpufreq/scaling_max_freq reduced, but this could have
      happened by:
        - any userspace prog writing to scaling_max_freq
        - thermal limitations
        - hardware (_PPC in ACPI case) limitiations
      
      Therefore export bios_limit (in kHz) to:
        - Point the user that it's the BIOS (broken or intended) which limits
          frequency
        - Export it as a sysfs interface for userspace progs.
          While this was a rarely used feature on laptops, there will appear
          more and more server implemenations providing "Green IT" features like
          allowing the service processor to limit the frequency. People want
          to know about HW/BIOS frequency limitations.
      
      All ACPI P-state driven cpufreq drivers are covered with this patch:
        - powernow-k8
        - powernow-k7
        - acpi-cpufreq
      
      Tested with a patched DSDT which limits the first two cores (_PPC returns 1)
      via _PPC, exposed by bios_limit:
      # echo 2200000 >cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
      # cat cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
      2600000
      2600000
      2200000
      2200000
      # #scaling_max_freq shows general user/thermal/BIOS limitations
      
      # cat cpu*/cpufreq/bios_limit
      2600000
      2600000
      2800000
      2800000
      # #bios_limit only shows the HW/BIOS limitation
      
      CC: Pallipadi Venkatesh <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
      CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
      CC: davej@codemonkey.org.uk
      CC: linux@dominikbrodowski.net
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      e2f74f35
    • R
      [CPUFREQ] cpumask: don't put a cpumask on the stack in x86...cpufreq/powernow-k8.c · b8cbe7e8
      Rusty Russell 提交于
      It's still mugging the current process's cpumask, but as comment in
      1ff6e97f says, it's not a trivial fix.
      
      So, at least we can use a cpumask_var_t to do the Wrong Thing the Right Way :)
      Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      b8cbe7e8
  9. 18 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  10. 16 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 02 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  12. 09 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 07 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 15 6月, 2009 7 次提交
  15. 09 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  16. 06 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 27 5月, 2009 2 次提交
    • A
      [CPUFREQ] powernow-k8: determine exact CPU frequency for HW Pstates · ca446d06
      Andreas Herrmann 提交于
      Slightly modified by trenn@suse.de -> only do this on fam 10h and fam 11h.
      
      Currently powernow-k8 determines CPU frequency from ACPI PSS objects, but
      according to AMD family 11h BKDG this frequency is just a rounded value:
      
        "CoreFreq (MHz) = The CPU COF specified by MSRC001_00[6B:64][CpuFid]
        rounded to the nearest 100 Mhz."
      
      As a consequnce powernow-k8 reports wrong CPU frequency on some systems,
      e.g. on Turion X2 Ultra:
      
        powernow-k8: Found 1 AMD Turion(tm)X2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-82
                     processors (2 cpu cores) (version 2.20.00)
        powernow-k8:    0 : pstate 0 (2200 MHz)
        powernow-k8:    1 : pstate 1 (1100 MHz)
        powernow-k8:    2 : pstate 2 (600 MHz)
      
      But this is wrong as frequency for Pstate2 is 550 MHz. x86info reports it
      correctly:
      
        #x86info -a |grep Pstate
        ...
        Pstate-0: fid=e, did=0, vid=24 (2200MHz)
        Pstate-1: fid=e, did=1, vid=30 (1100MHz)
        Pstate-2: fid=e, did=2, vid=3c (550MHz) (current)
      
      Solution is to determine the frequency directly from Pstate MSRs instead
      of using rounded values from ACPI table.
      Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      ca446d06
    • T
      [CPUFREQ] powernow-k8 cleanup msg if BIOS does not export ACPI _PSS cpufreq data · df182977
      Thomas Renninger 提交于
      - Make the message shorter and easier to grep for
      - Use printk_once instead of WARN_ONCE (functionality of these was mixed)
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
      Cc: Langsdorf, Mark <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      df182977
  18. 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 25 2月, 2009 4 次提交
  20. 16 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 06 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  22. 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 04 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  24. 26 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      [CPUFREQ] powernow-k8: ignore out-of-range PstateStatus value · a266d9f1
      Andreas Herrmann 提交于
      A workaround for AMD CPU family 11h erratum 311 might cause that the
      P-state Status Register shows a "current P-state" which is larger than
      the "current P-state limit" in P-state Current Limit Register. For the
      wrong P-state value there is no ACPI _PSS object defined and
      powernow-k8/cpufreq can't determine the proper CPU frequency for that
      state.
      
      As a consequence this can cause a panic during boot (potentially with
      all recent kernel versions -- at least I have reproduced it with
      various 2.6.27 kernels and with the current .28 series), as an
      example:
      
      powernow-k8: Found 1 AMD Turion(tm)X2 Ultra DualCore Mobile ZM-82 processors (2 \
      )
      powernow-k8:    0 : pstate 0 (2200 MHz)
      powernow-k8:    1 : pstate 1 (1100 MHz)
      powernow-k8:    2 : pstate 2 (600 MHz)
      BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88086e7528b8
      IP: [<ffffffff80486361>] cpufreq_stats_update+0x4a/0x5f
      PGD 202063 PUD 0
      Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
      last sysfs file:
      CPU 1
      Modules linked in:
      Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28-rc3-dirty #16
      RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80486361>]  [<ffffffff80486361>] cpufreq_stats_update+0x4a/0\
      f
      Synaptics claims to have extended capabilities, but I'm not able to read them.<6\
      6
      RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff88006e7528c0
      RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: ffff88006e54af00 RDI: ffffffff808f056c
      RBP: 00000000fffee697 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: ffff88006e73f080
      R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000002191c0 R12: ffff88006fb83c10
      R13: 00000000ffffffff R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
      FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88006fb50740(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      Unable to initialize Synaptics hardware.
      CS:  0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
      CR2: ffff88086e7528b8 CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
      DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      Process swapper (pid: 1, threadinfo ffff88006fb82000, task ffff88006fb816d0)
      Stack:
       ffff88006e74da50 0000000000000000 ffff88006e54af00 ffffffff804863c7
       ffff88006e74da50 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
       ffff88006fb83c10 ffffffff8024b46c ffffffff808f0560 ffff88006fb83c10
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff804863c7>] ? cpufreq_stat_notifier_trans+0x51/0x83
       [<ffffffff8024b46c>] ? notifier_call_chain+0x29/0x4c
       [<ffffffff8024b561>] ? __srcu_notifier_call_chain+0x46/0x61
       [<ffffffff8048496d>] ? cpufreq_notify_transition+0x93/0xa9
       [<ffffffff8021ab8d>] ? powernowk8_target+0x1e8/0x5f3
       [<ffffffff80486687>] ? cpufreq_governor_performance+0x1b/0x20
       [<ffffffff80484886>] ? __cpufreq_governor+0x71/0xa8
       [<ffffffff80484b21>] ? __cpufreq_set_policy+0x101/0x13e
       [<ffffffff80485bcd>] ? cpufreq_add_dev+0x3f0/0x4cd
       [<ffffffff8048577a>] ? handle_update+0x0/0x8
       [<ffffffff803c2062>] ? sysdev_driver_register+0xb6/0x10d
       [<ffffffff8056592c>] ? powernowk8_init+0x0/0x7e
       [<ffffffff8048604c>] ? cpufreq_register_driver+0x8f/0x140
       [<ffffffff80209056>] ? _stext+0x56/0x14f
       [<ffffffff802c2234>] ? proc_register+0x122/0x17d
       [<ffffffff802c23a0>] ? create_proc_entry+0x73/0x8a
       [<ffffffff8025c259>] ? register_irq_proc+0x92/0xaa
       [<ffffffff8025c2c8>] ? init_irq_proc+0x57/0x69
       [<ffffffff807fc85f>] ? kernel_init+0x116/0x169
       [<ffffffff8020cc79>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x11
       [<ffffffff807fc749>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x169
       [<ffffffff8020cc6f>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x11
      Code: 05 c5 83 36 00 48 c7 c2 48 5d 86 80 48 8b 04 d8 48 8b 40 08 48 8b 34 02 48\
      
      RIP  [<ffffffff80486361>] cpufreq_stats_update+0x4a/0x5f
       RSP <ffff88006fb83b20>
      CR2: ffff88086e7528b8
      ---[ end trace 0678bac75e67a2f7 ]---
      Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
      
      In short, aftereffect of the wrong P-state is that
      cpufreq_stats_update() uses "-1" as index for some array in
      
      cpufreq_stats_update (unsigned int cpu)
      {
      ...
           if (stat->time_in_state)
                      stat->time_in_state[stat->last_index] =
                              cputime64_add(stat->time_in_state[stat->last_index],
                                            cputime_sub(cur_time, stat->last_time));
      ...
      }
      
      Fortunately, the wrong P-state value is returned only if the core is
      in P-state 0. This fix solves the problem by detecting the
      out-of-range P-state, ignoring it, and using "0" instead.
      
      Cc: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      a266d9f1
  25. 21 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  26. 23 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 20 8月, 2008 1 次提交