Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 25 3月, 2009 10 次提交
  3. 17 3月, 2009 2 次提交
  5. 11 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      sched: add avg_overlap decay · df1c99d4
      由 Mike Galbraith 提交于 
      Impact: more precise avg_overlap metric - better load-balancing

avg_overlap is used to measure the runtime overlap of the waker and
wakee.

However, when a process changes behaviour, eg a pipe becomes
un-congested and we don't need to go to sleep after a wakeup
for a while, the avg_overlap value grows stale.

When running we use the avg runtime between preemption as a
measure for avg_overlap since the amount of runtime can be
correlated to cache footprint.

The longer we run, the less likely we'll be wanting to be
migrated to another CPU.
Signed-off-by: NMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1236709131.25234.576.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      df1c99d4
  7. 10 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 06 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 05 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • F
      sched: don't rebalance if attached on NULL domain · 8a0be9ef
      由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于 
      Impact: fix function graph trace hang / drop pointless softirq on UP

While debugging a function graph trace hang on an old PII, I saw
that it consumed most of its time on the timer interrupt. And
the domain rebalancing softirq was the most concerned.

The timer interrupt calls trigger_load_balance() which will
decide if it is worth to schedule a rebalancing softirq.

In case of builtin UP kernel, no problem arises because there is
no domain question.

In case of builtin SMP kernel running on an SMP box, still no
problem, the softirq will be raised each time we reach the
next_balance time.

In case of builtin SMP kernel running on a UP box (most distros
provide default SMP kernels, whatever the box you have), then
the CPU is attached to the NULL sched domain. So a kind of
unexpected behaviour happen:

trigger_load_balance() -> raises the rebalancing softirq later
on softirq: run_rebalance_domains() -> rebalance_domains() where
the for_each_domain(cpu, sd) is not taken because of the NULL
domain we are attached at. Which means rq->next_balance is never
updated. So on the next timer tick, we will enter
trigger_load_balance() which will always reschedule() the
rebalacing softirq:

if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rq->next_balance))
	raise_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);

So for each tick, we process this pointless softirq.

This patch fixes it by checking if we are attached to the null
domain before raising the softirq, another possible fix would be
to set the maximal possible JIFFIES value to rq->next_balance if
we are attached to the NULL domain.

v2: build fix on UP
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <49af242d.1c07d00a.32d5.ffffc019@mx.google.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      8a0be9ef
  13. 02 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 27 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 26 2月, 2009 2 次提交
  19. 16 2月, 2009 2 次提交
  21. 12 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 11 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 06 2月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      wait: prevent exclusive waiter starvation · 777c6c5f
      由 Johannes Weiner 提交于 
      With exclusive waiters, every process woken up through the wait queue must
ensure that the next waiter down the line is woken when it has finished.

Interruptible waiters don't do that when aborting due to a signal.  And if
an aborting waiter is concurrently woken up through the waitqueue, noone
will ever wake up the next waiter.

This has been observed with __wait_on_bit_lock() used by
lock_page_killable(): the first contender on the queue was aborting when
the actual lock holder woke it up concurrently.  The aborted contender
didn't acquire the lock and therefor never did an unlock followed by
waking up the next waiter.

Add abort_exclusive_wait() which removes the process' wait descriptor from
the waitqueue, iff still queued, or wakes up the next waiter otherwise.
It does so under the waitqueue lock.  Racing with a wake up means the
aborting process is either already woken (removed from the queue) and will
wake up the next waiter, or it will remove itself from the queue and the
concurrent wake up will apply to the next waiter after it.

Use abort_exclusive_wait() in __wait_event_interruptible_exclusive() and
__wait_on_bit_lock() when they were interrupted by other means than a wake
up through the queue.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Reported-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Mentored-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		["after some testing"]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      777c6c5f
  27. 05 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 01 2月, 2009 2 次提交
  31. 15 1月, 2009 3 次提交
  33. 14 1月, 2009 4 次提交
  35. 12 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  37. 11 1月, 2009 2 次提交
  39. 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • P
      sched: fix possible recursive rq->lock · da8d5089
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Vaidyanathan Srinivasan reported:

 > =============================================
 > [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
 > 2.6.28-autotest-tip-sv #1
 > ---------------------------------------------
 > klogd/5062 is trying to acquire lock:
 >  (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff8022aca2>] task_rq_lock+0x45/0x7e
 >
 > but task is already holding lock:
 >  (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff805f7354>] schedule+0x158/0xa31

With sched_mc at 2. (it is default-off)

Strictly speaking we'll not deadlock, because ttwu will not be able to
place the migration task on our rq, but since the code can deal with
both rqs getting unlocked, this seems the easiest way out.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      da8d5089
  41. 06 1月, 2009 1 次提交