Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 19 10月, 2017 11 次提交
  3. 18 10月, 2017 4 次提交
    • J
      bpf: disallow arithmetic operations on context pointer · 28e33f9d
      由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于 
      Commit f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
removed the crafty selection of which pointer types are
allowed to be modified.  This is OK for most pointer types
since adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() will catch operations on
immutable pointers.  One exception is PTR_TO_CTX which is
now allowed to be offseted freely.

The intent of aforementioned commit was to allow context
access via modified registers.  The offset passed to
->is_valid_access() verifier callback has been adjusted
by the value of the variable offset.

What is missing, however, is taking the variable offset
into account when the context register is used.  Or in terms
of the code adding the offset to the value passed to the
->convert_ctx_access() callback.  This leads to the following
eBPF user code:

     r1 += 68
     r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8)
     exit

being translated to this in kernel space:

   0: (07) r1 += 68
   1: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +180)
   2: (95) exit

Offset 8 is corresponding to 180 in the kernel, but offset
76 is valid too.  Verifier will "accept" access to offset
68+8=76 but then "convert" access to offset 8 as 180.
Effective access to offset 248 is beyond the kernel context.
(This is a __sk_buff example on a debug-heavy kernel -
packet mark is 8 -> 180, 76 would be data.)

Dereferencing the modified context pointer is not as easy
as dereferencing other types, because we have to translate
the access to reading a field in kernel structures which is
usually at a different offset and often of a different size.
To allow modifying the pointer we would have to make sure
that given eBPF instruction will always access the same
field or the fields accessed are "compatible" in terms of
offset and size...

Disallow dereferencing modified context pointers and add
to selftests the test case described here.

Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      28e33f9d
    • J
      netlink: fix netlink_ack() extack race · 48044eb4
      由 Johannes Berg 提交于 
      It seems that it's possible to toggle NETLINK_F_EXT_ACK
through setsockopt() while another thread/CPU is building
a message inside netlink_ack(), which could then trigger
the WARN_ON()s I added since if it goes from being turned
off to being turned on between allocating and filling the
message, the skb could end up being too small.

Avoid this whole situation by storing the value of this
flag in a separate variable and using that throughout the
function instead.

Fixes: 2d4bc933 ("netlink: extended ACK reporting")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      48044eb4
    • T
      ibmvnic: Fix calculation of number of TX header descriptors · 2de09681
      由 Thomas Falcon 提交于 
      This patch correctly sets the number of additional header descriptors
that will be sent in an indirect SCRQ entry.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      2de09681
    • I
      mlxsw: core: Fix possible deadlock · d965465b
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When an EMAD is transmitted, a timeout work item is scheduled with a
delay of 200ms, so that another EMAD will be retried until a maximum of
five retries.

In certain situations, it's possible for the function waiting on the
EMAD to be associated with a work item that is queued on the same
workqueue (`mlxsw_core`) as the timeout work item. This results in
flushing a work item on the same workqueue.

According to commit e159489b ("workqueue: relax lockdep annotation
on flush_work()") the above may lead to a deadlock in case the workqueue
has only one worker active or if the system in under memory pressure and
the rescue worker is in use. The latter explains the very rare and
random nature of the lockdep splats we have been seeing:

[   52.730240] ============================================
[   52.736179] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[   52.742119] 4.14.0-rc3jiri+ #4 Not tainted
[   52.746697] --------------------------------------------
[   52.752635] kworker/1:3/599 is trying to acquire lock:
[   52.758378]  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c4fa4>] flush_work+0x3a4/0x5e0
[   52.767837]
               but task is already holding lock:
[   52.774360]  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
[   52.784495]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[   52.791794]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   52.798413]        CPU0
[   52.801144]        ----
[   52.803875]   lock(mlxsw_core_driver_name);
[   52.808556]   lock(mlxsw_core_driver_name);
[   52.813236]
                *** DEADLOCK ***
[   52.819857]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   52.827450] 3 locks held by kworker/1:3/599:
[   52.832221]  #0:  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
[   52.842846]  #1:  ((&(&bridge->fdb_notify.dw)->work)){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
[   52.854537]  #2:  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff822ad8e7>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
[   52.863021]
               stack backtrace:
[   52.867890] CPU: 1 PID: 599 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc3jiri+ #4
[   52.875773] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. "MSN2100-CB2F"/"SA001017", BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016
[   52.886267] Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work [mlxsw_spectrum]
[   52.894060] Call Trace:
[   52.909122]  __lock_acquire+0xf6f/0x2a10
[   53.025412]  lock_acquire+0x158/0x440
[   53.047557]  flush_work+0x3c4/0x5e0
[   53.087571]  __cancel_work_timer+0x3ca/0x5e0
[   53.177051]  cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
[   53.182142]  mlxsw_reg_trans_bulk_wait+0x12d/0x7a0 [mlxsw_core]
[   53.194571]  mlxsw_core_reg_access+0x586/0x990 [mlxsw_core]
[   53.225365]  mlxsw_reg_query+0x10/0x20 [mlxsw_core]
[   53.230882]  mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work+0x2a3/0x9d0 [mlxsw_spectrum]
[   53.237801]  process_one_work+0x8f1/0x12f0
[   53.321804]  worker_thread+0x1fd/0x10c0
[   53.435158]  kthread+0x28e/0x370
[   53.448703]  ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x40
[   53.453017] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD retries (2/5) (tid=bf4549b100000774)
[   53.453119] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD retries (5/5) (tid=bf4549b100000770)
[   53.453132] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD reg access failed (tid=bf4549b100000770,reg_id=200b(sfn),type=query,status=0(operation performed))
[   53.453143] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: Failed to get FDB notifications

Fix this by creating another workqueue for EMAD timeouts, thereby
preventing the situation of a work item trying to flush a work item
queued on the same workqueue.

Fixes: caf7297e ("mlxsw: core: Introduce support for asynchronous EMAD register access")
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reported-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d965465b
  5. 17 10月, 2017 12 次提交
  7. 16 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      mac80211: accept key reinstall without changing anything · fdf7cb41
      由 Johannes Berg 提交于 
      When a key is reinstalled we can reset the replay counters
etc. which can lead to nonce reuse and/or replay detection
being impossible, breaking security properties, as described
in the "KRACK attacks".

In particular, CVE-2017-13080 applies to GTK rekeying that
happened in firmware while the host is in D3, with the second
part of the attack being done after the host wakes up. In
this case, the wpa_supplicant mitigation isn't sufficient
since wpa_supplicant doesn't know the GTK material.

In case this happens, simply silently accept the new key
coming from userspace but don't take any action on it since
it's the same key; this keeps the PN replay counters intact.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
      fdf7cb41
  9. 15 10月, 2017 10 次提交
  11. 14 10月, 2017 2 次提交