1. 29 1月, 2014 40 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: Add "barrier" option to support "-o remount,barrier" · 842bef58
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      Btrfs can be remounted without barrier, but there is no "barrier" option
      so nobody can remount btrfs back with barrier on. Only umount and
      mount again can re-enable barrier.(Quite awkward)
      
      Also the mount options in the document is also changed slightly for the
      further pairing options changes.
      Reported-by: NDaniel Blueman <daniel@quora.org>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMike Fleetwood <mike.fleetwood@googlemail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      842bef58
    • W
      Btrfs: only fua the first superblock when writting supers · e8117c26
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      We only intent to fua the first superblock in every device from
      comments, fix it.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e8117c26
    • L
      Btrfs: return free space to global_rsv as much as possible · 17504584
      Liu Bo 提交于
      @full is not protected within global_rsv.lock, so we may think global_rsv
      is already full but in fact it's not, so we miss the opportunity to return
      free space to global_rsv directly when we release other block_rsvs.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      17504584
    • W
      Btrfs: fix an oops when we fail to relocate tree blocks · 1708cc57
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      During balance test, we hit an oops:
      [ 2013.841551] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1174!
      
      The problem is that if we fail to relocate tree blocks, we should
      update backref cache, otherwise, some pending nodes are not updated
      while snapshot check @cache->last_trans is within one transaction
      and won't update it and then oops happen.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      1708cc57
    • M
      Btrfs: fix the wrong nocow range check · e77751aa
      Miao Xie 提交于
      The following warning message was outputed when running the 274th case
      of xfstests with nodatacow option:
       BUG: Bad page state in process kswapd0  pfn:1c66f
       page:ffffea0000636848 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:(null) index:0x78000
       page flags: 0x1000000000100a(error|uptodate|private_2)
      
      It is because the check of nocow range was wrong, we should compare the
      start and end position of the extent with the write position to verify
      if the write position was in the extent, but the current code just used
      the start postion to do the check, so we got the wrong extent and told
      the caller that it was a nocow write. And then when we write back the
      dirty pages, we found we should cow the extent, but at that time, there
      was no space in the fs, we had to the error flag for the page. When
      someone reclaimed that page, the above warning outputed. Fix it.
      Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e77751aa
    • W
      Btrfs: fix an oops when we fail to merge reloc roots · 25e293c2
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      Previously, we will free reloc root memory and then force filesystem
      to be readonly. The problem is that there may be another thread commiting
      transaction which will try to access freed reloc root during merging reloc
      roots process.
      
      To keep consistency snapshots shared space, we should allow snapshot
      finished if possible, so here we don't free reloc root memory.
      signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      25e293c2
    • W
      Btrfs: remove unused argument from select_reloc_root() · dc4103f9
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      @nr is no longer used, remove it from select_reloc_root()
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      dc4103f9
    • F
      Btrfs: reduce btree node locking duration on item update · eb653de1
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      If we do a btree search with the goal of updating an existing item
      without changing its size (ins_len == 0 and cow == 1), then we never
      need to hold locks on upper level nodes (even when slot == 0) after we
      COW their child nodes/leaves, as we won't have node splits or merges
      in this scenario (that is, no key additions, removals or shifts on any
      nodes or leaves).
      
      Therefore release the locks immediately after COWing the child nodes/leaves
      while navigating the btree, even if their parent slot is 0, instead of
      returning a path to the caller with those nodes locked, which would get
      released only when the caller releases or frees the path (or if it calls
      btrfs_unlock_up_safe).
      
      This is a common scenario, for example when updating inode items in fs
      trees and block group items in the extent tree.
      
      The following benchmarks were performed on a quad core machine with 32Gb
      of ram, using a leaf/node size of 4Kb (to generate deeper fs trees more
      quickly).
      
        sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=131072 --file-total-size=8G \
          --file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \
          --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run]
      
      Before this change:  49.85Mb/s (average of 5 runs)
      After this change:   50.38Mb/s (average of 5 runs)
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      eb653de1
    • W
      fs/btrfs: Integer overflow in btrfs_ioctl_resize() · eb8052e0
      Wenliang Fan 提交于
      The local variable 'new_size' comes from userspace. If a large number
      was passed, there would be an integer overflow in the following line:
      	new_size = old_size + new_size;
      Signed-off-by: NWenliang Fan <fanwlexca@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      eb8052e0
    • J
      Btrfs: stop caching thread if extent_commit_sem is contended · c9ea7b24
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We can starve out the transaction commit with a bunch of caching threads all
      running at the same time.  This is because we will only drop the
      extent_commit_sem if we need_resched(), which isn't likely to happen since we
      will be reading a lot from the disk so have already schedule()'ed plenty.  Alex
      observed that he could starve out a transaction commit for up to a minute with
      32 caching threads all running at once.  This will allow us to drop the
      extent_commit_sem to allow the transaction commit to swap the commit_root out
      and then all the cachers will start back up. Here is an explanation provided by
      Igno
      
      So, just to fill in what happens in this loop:
      
                                      mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                                      cond_resched();
                                      goto again;
      
      where 'again:' takes caching_ctl->mutex and fs_info->extent_commit_sem
      again:
      
              again:
                      mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                      /* need to make sure the commit_root doesn't disappear */
                      down_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);
      
      So, if I'm reading the code correct, there can be a fair amount of
      concurrency here: there may be multiple 'caching kthreads' per filesystem
      active, while there's one fs_info->extent_commit_sem per filesystem
      AFAICS.
      
      So, what happens if there are a lot of CPUs all busy holding the
      ->extent_commit_sem rwsem read-locked and a writer arrives? They'd all
      rush to try to release the fs_info->extent_commit_sem, and they'd block in
      the down_read() because there's a writer waiting.
      
      So there's a guarantee of forward progress. This should answer akpm's
      concern I think.
      
      Thanks,
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c9ea7b24
    • J
      rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended · 4a444b1f
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Btrfs needs a simple way to know if it needs to let go of it's read lock on a
      rwsem.  Introduce rwsem_is_contended to check to see if there are any waiters on
      this rwsem currently.  This is just a hueristic, it is meant to be light and not
      100% accurate and called by somebody already holding on to the rwsem in either
      read or write.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      4a444b1f
    • M
      Btrfs: introduce the delayed inode ref deletion for the single link inode · 67de1176
      Miao Xie 提交于
      The inode reference item is close to inode item, so we insert it simultaneously
      with the inode item insertion when we create a file/directory.. In fact, we also
      can handle the inode reference deletion by the same way. So we made this patch to
      introduce the delayed inode reference deletion for the single link inode(At most
      case, the file doesn't has hard link, so we don't take the hard link into account).
      
      This function is based on the delayed inode mechanism. After applying this patch,
      we can reduce the time of the file/directory deletion by ~10%.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      67de1176
    • M
      Btrfs: use flags instead of the bool variants in delayed node · 7cf35d91
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      7cf35d91
    • M
      Btrfs: remove btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta() · a56dbd89
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Two reasons:
      - btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta() is the same as btrfs_end_transaction_throttle()
        so it is unnecessary.
      - All the delayed items should be dealt in the current transaction, so the
        workers should not commit the transaction, instead, deal with the delayed
        items as many as possible.
      
      So we can remove btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta()
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a56dbd89
    • M
      Btrfs: cleanup code of btrfs_balance_delayed_items() · 0353808c
      Miao Xie 提交于
      - move the condition check for wait into a function
      - use wait_event_interruptible instead of prepare-schedule-finish process
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      0353808c
    • M
      Btrfs: don't run delayed nodes again after all nodes flush · 4dd466d3
      Miao Xie 提交于
      If the number of the delayed items is greater than the upper limit, we will
      try to flush all the delayed items. After that, it is unnecessary to run
      them again because they are being dealt with by the wokers or the number of
      them is less than the lower limit.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      4dd466d3
    • M
      Btrfs: remove residual code in delayed inode async helper · 74c40f92
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Before applying the patch
        commit de3cb945
        title: Btrfs: improve the delayed inode throttling
      
      We need requeue the async work after the current work was done, it
      introduced a deadlock problem. So we wrote the code that this patch
      removes to avoid the above problem. But after applying the above
      patch, the deadlock problem didn't exist. So we should remove that
      fix code.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      74c40f92
    • F
      Btrfs: convert printk to btrfs_ and fix BTRFS prefix · efe120a0
      Frank Holton 提交于
      Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.
      
      Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.
      Signed-off-by: NFrank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      efe120a0
    • F
      Btrfs: fix tree mod logging · 5de865ee
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      While running the test btrfs/004 from xfstests in a loop, it failed
      about 1 time out of 20 runs in my desktop. The failure happened in
      the backref walking part of the test, and the test's error message was
      like this:
      
        btrfs/004 93s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad)
            --- tests/btrfs/004.out	2013-11-26 18:25:29.263333714 +0000
            +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad	2013-12-10 15:25:10.327518516 +0000
            @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
             QA output created by 004
             *** test backref walking
            -*** done
            +unexpected output from
            +	/home/fdmanana/git/hub/btrfs-progs/btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
            +expected inum: 405, expected address: 454656, file: /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/d6/d3d/d156/fce, got:
            +
             ...
             (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/004.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
        Ran: btrfs/004
        Failures: btrfs/004
        Failed 1 of 1 tests
      
      But immediately after the test finished, the btrfs inspect-internal command
      returned the expected output:
      
        $ btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
        inode 405 offset 454656 root 258
        inode 405 offset 454656 root 5
      
      It turned out this was because the btrfs_search_old_slot() calls performed
      during backref walking (backref.c:__resolve_indirect_ref) were not finding
      anything. The reason for this turned out to be that the tree mod logging
      code was not logging some node multi-step operations atomically, therefore
      btrfs_search_old_slot() callers iterated often over an incomplete tree that
      wasn't fully consistent with any tree state from the past. Besides missing
      items, this often (but not always) resulted in -EIO errors during old slot
      searches, reported in dmesg like this:
      
      [ 4299.933936] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [ 4299.933949] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 23190 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1343 btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]()
      [ 4299.933950] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) bnep rfcomm bluetooth parport_pc ppdev binfmt_misc joydev snd_hda_codec_h
      [ 4299.933977] CPU: 0 PID: 23190 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
      [ 4299.933978] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
      [ 4299.933979]  000000000000053f ffff8806f3fd98f8 ffffffff8176d284 0000000000000007
      [ 4299.933982]  0000000000000000 ffff8806f3fd9938 ffffffff8104a81c ffff880659c64b70
      [ 4299.933984]  ffff880659c643d0 ffff8806599233d8 ffff880701e2e938 0000160000000000
      [ 4299.933987] Call Trace:
      [ 4299.933991]  [<ffffffff8176d284>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
      [ 4299.933994]  [<ffffffff8104a81c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
      [ 4299.933997]  [<ffffffff8104a86a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
      [ 4299.934003]  [<ffffffffa065d3bb>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934005]  [<ffffffff81775f3b>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x2b/0x50
      [ 4299.934010]  [<ffffffffa0655001>] ? __tree_mod_log_search+0x81/0xc0 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934019]  [<ffffffffa06dd9b0>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x130/0x5f0 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934027]  [<ffffffffa06a21f1>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934034]  [<ffffffffa06de39c>] find_parent_nodes+0x1fc/0xe40 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934042]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934048]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934056]  [<ffffffffa06df980>] iterate_extent_inodes+0xe0/0x250 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934058]  [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
      [ 4299.934065]  [<ffffffffa06dfb82>] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x92/0xb0 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934071]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934078]  [<ffffffffa06b7015>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf65/0x1f60 [btrfs]
      [ 4299.934080]  [<ffffffff811658b8>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x278/0xb00
      [ 4299.934083]  [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
      [ 4299.934085]  [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
      [ 4299.934088]  [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
      [ 4299.934090]  [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
      [ 4299.934093]  [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
      [ 4299.934096]  [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
      [ 4299.934098]  [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
      [ 4299.934100]  [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
      [ 4299.934102]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [ 4299.934102]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [ 4299.934104] ---[ end trace 48f0cfc902491414 ]---
      [ 4299.934378] btrfs bad fsid on block 0
      
      These tree mod log operations that must be performed atomically, tree_mod_log_free_eb,
      tree_mod_log_eb_copy, tree_mod_log_insert_root and tree_mod_log_insert_move, used to
      be performed atomically before the following commit:
      
        c8cc6341
        (Btrfs: stop using GFP_ATOMIC for the tree mod log allocations)
      
      That change removed the atomicity of such operations. This patch restores the
      atomicity while still not doing the GFP_ATOMIC allocations of tree_mod_elem
      structures, so it has to do the allocations using GFP_NOFS before acquiring
      the mod log lock.
      
      This issue has been experienced by several users recently, such as for example:
      
        http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg28574.html
      
      After running the btrfs/004 test for 679 consecutive iterations with this
      patch applied, I didn't ran into the issue anymore.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5de865ee
    • D
      btrfs: check balance of send_in_progress · 66ef7d65
      David Sterba 提交于
      Warn if the balance goes below zero, which appears to be unlikely
      though. Otherwise cleans up the code a bit.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      66ef7d65
    • W
      Btrfs: remove transaction from btrfs send · 41ce9970
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      Since daivd did the work that force us to use readonly snapshot,
      we can safely remove transaction protection from btrfs send.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      41ce9970
    • M
      Btrfs: fix double initialization of the raid kobject · 536cd964
      Miao Xie 提交于
      We met the following oops when doing space balance:
       kobject (ffff88081b590278): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
       ...
       Call Trace:
        [<ffffffff81937262>] dump_stack+0x49/0x5f
        [<ffffffff8137d259>] kobject_init+0x89/0xa0
        [<ffffffff8137d36a>] kobject_init_and_add+0x2a/0x70
        [<ffffffffa009bd79>] ? clear_extent_bit+0x199/0x470 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa005e82c>] __link_block_group+0xfc/0x120 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa006b9db>] btrfs_make_block_group+0x24b/0x370 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa00a899b>] __btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54b/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa00a8c6f>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x3f/0x50 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0060123>] do_chunk_alloc+0x363/0x440 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa00633d4>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x104/0x310 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0069f4d>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x48d/0x600 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa007aad4>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x184/0x250 [btrfs]
        ...
      
      Steps to reproduce:
       # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev>
       # mount -o nospace_cache <dev> <mnt>
       # btrfs balance start <mnt>
       # dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/tmpfile bs=1M count=1
      
      The reason of this problem is that we initialized the raid kobject when we added
      a block group into a empty raid list. As we know, when we mounted a btrfs filesystem,
      the raid list was empty, we would initialize the raid kobject when we added the first
      block group. But if there was not data stored in the block group, the block group
      would be freed when doing balance, and the raid list would be empty. And then if we
      allocated a new block group and added it into the raid list, we would initialize
      the raid kobject again, the oops happened.
      
      Fix this problem by initializing the raid kobject just when mounting the fs.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reported-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      536cd964
    • W
      Btrfs: fix a warning when iput a file · 180589ef
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      See the warning below:
      
      [ 1209.102076]  [<ffffffffa04721b9>] remove_extent_mapping+0x69/0x70 [btrfs]
      [ 1209.102084]  [<ffffffffa0466b06>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x96/0x4d0 [btrfs]
      [ 1209.102089]  [<ffffffff81073010>] ? wake_atomic_t_function+0x40/0x40
      [ 1209.102092]  [<ffffffff8118ab2e>] evict+0x9e/0x190
      [ 1209.102094]  [<ffffffff8118b313>] iput+0xf3/0x180
      [ 1209.102101]  [<ffffffffa0461fd1>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0xb1/0xd0 [btrfs]
      [ 1209.102107]  [<ffffffffa045d358>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x268/0x350 [btrfs]
      
      clear extent bit here to avoid triggering WARN_ON() in remove_extent_mapping()
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      180589ef
    • D
      btrfs: Check read-only status of roots during send · 2c686537
      David Sterba 提交于
      All the subvolues that are involved in send must be read-only during the
      whole operation. The ioctl SUBVOL_SETFLAGS could be used to change the
      status to read-write and the result of send stream is undefined if the
      data change unexpectedly.
      
      Fix that by adding a refcount for all involved roots and verify that
      there's no send in progress during SUBVOL_SETFLAGS ioctl call that does
      read-only -> read-write transition.
      
      We need refcounts because there are no restrictions on number of send
      parallel operations currently run on a single subvolume, be it source,
      parent or one of the multiple clone sources.
      
      Kernel is silent when the RO checks fail and returns EPERM. The same set
      of checks is done already in userspace before send starts.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      2c686537
    • D
      btrfs: remove unused mnt from send_ctx · a8d89f5b
      David Sterba 提交于
      Unused since ed259095
      "Btrfs: stop using vfs_read in send".
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a8d89f5b
    • D
      btrfs: send: clean up dead code · 95bc79d5
      David Sterba 提交于
      Remove ifdefed code:
      
      - tlv_put for 8, 16 and 32, add a generic tempalte if needed in future
      - tlv_put_timespec - the btrfs_timespec fields are used
      - fs_path_remove obsoleted long ago
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      95bc79d5
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when iterating inode refs and running delayed inodes · 3fe81ce2
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      While running btrfs/004 from xfstests, after 503 iterations, dmesg reported
      a deadlock between tasks iterating inode refs and tasks running delayed inodes
      (during a transaction commit).
      
      It turns out that iterating inode refs implies doing one tree search and
      release all nodes in the path except the leaf node, and then passing that
      leaf node to btrfs_ref_to_path(), which in turn does another tree search
      without releasing the lock on the leaf node it received as parameter.
      
      This is a problem when other task wants to write to the btree as well and
      ends up updating the leaf that is read locked - the writer task locks the
      parent of the leaf and then blocks waiting for the leaf's lock to be
      released - at the same time, the task executing btrfs_ref_to_path()
      does a second tree search, without releasing the lock on the first leaf,
      and wants to access a leaf (the same or another one) that is a child of
      the same parent, resulting in a deadlock.
      
      The trace reported by lockdep follows.
      
      [84314.936373] INFO: task fsstress:11930 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [84314.936381]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
      [84314.936383] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [84314.936386] fsstress        D ffff8806e1bf8000     0 11930  11926 0x00000000
      [84314.936393]  ffff8804d6d89b78 0000000000000046 ffff8804d6d89b18 ffffffff810bd8bd
      [84314.936399]  ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8
      [84314.936405]  ffff880806308000 ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89c08 ffff8804deb8f190
      [84314.936410] Call Trace:
      [84314.936421]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
      [84314.936428]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
      [84314.936451]  [<ffffffffa0715bf5>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x75/0x270 [btrfs]
      [84314.936457]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
      [84314.936470]  [<ffffffffa06ba231>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f1/0x930 [btrfs]
      [84314.936489]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936504]  [<ffffffffa06d2e1f>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0xa0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936510]  [<ffffffff810bd6ef>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x1e0
      [84314.936528]  [<ffffffffa073173c>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x4c/0x1d0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936543]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936558]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936573]  [<ffffffffa0731c82>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x192/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936589]  [<ffffffffa0731d03>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 [btrfs]
      [84314.936604]  [<ffffffffa06dbcd4>] btrfs_flush_all_pending_stuffs+0x24/0x80 [btrfs]
      [84314.936620]  [<ffffffffa06ddc13>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x223/0xa20 [btrfs]
      [84314.936630]  [<ffffffffa06ae5ae>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x6e/0x110 [btrfs]
      [84314.936635]  [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60
      [84314.936639]  [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60
      [84314.936643]  [<ffffffff811d0b70>] sync_fs_one_sb+0x20/0x30
      [84314.936648]  [<ffffffff811a3541>] iterate_supers+0xf1/0x100
      [84314.936652]  [<ffffffff811d0c45>] sys_sync+0x55/0x90
      [84314.936658]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [84314.936660] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
      [84314.936663] INFO: task btrfs:11955 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [84314.936666]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
      [84314.936668] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [84314.936670] btrfs           D ffff880541729a88     0 11955  11608 0x00000000
      [84314.936674]  ffff880541729a38 0000000000000046 ffff8805417299d8 ffffffff810bd8bd
      [84314.936680]  ffff88075430c8a0 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8
      [84314.936685]  ffffffff81c104e0 ffff88075430c8a0 ffff8804de8b00b8 ffff8804de8b0000
      [84314.936690] Call Trace:
      [84314.936695]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
      [84314.936700]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
      [84314.936717]  [<ffffffffa0715815>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xd5/0x140 [btrfs]
      [84314.936721]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
      [84314.936733]  [<ffffffffa06ba201>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7c1/0x930 [btrfs]
      [84314.936746]  [<ffffffffa06bd505>] btrfs_find_item+0x55/0x160 [btrfs]
      [84314.936763]  [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936780]  [<ffffffffa073c9ca>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xba/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936797]  [<ffffffffa06f9719>] ? release_extent_buffer+0xb9/0xe0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936813]  [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936830]  [<ffffffffa073cb50>] inode_to_path+0x60/0xd0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936846]  [<ffffffffa073d365>] paths_from_inode+0x115/0x3c0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936851]  [<ffffffff8118dd44>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x114/0x200
      [84314.936868]  [<ffffffffa0714494>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf14/0x2030 [btrfs]
      [84314.936873]  [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
      [84314.936877]  [<ffffffff8116598f>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x34f/0xb00
      [84314.936882]  [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
      [84314.936886]  [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
      [84314.936892]  [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
      [84314.936896]  [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
      [84314.936901]  [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
      [84314.936906]  [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
      [84314.936910]  [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
      [84314.936915]  [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
      [84314.936920]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [84314.936922] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
      [84434.866873] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:11921 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [84434.866881]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
      [84434.866883] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [84434.866886] btrfs-transacti D ffff880755b6a478     0 11921      2 0x00000000
      [84434.866893]  ffff8800735b9ce8 0000000000000046 ffff8800735b9c88 ffffffff810bd8bd
      [84434.866899]  ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8
      [84434.866904]  ffffffff81c104e0 ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff880755b6a478 ffff8804cece78f0
      [84434.866910] Call Trace:
      [84434.866920]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
      [84434.866927]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
      [84434.866948]  [<ffffffffa06dd2ef>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs]
      [84434.866954]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
      [84434.866970]  [<ffffffffa06dec18>] start_transaction+0x388/0x5a0 [btrfs]
      [84434.866985]  [<ffffffffa06db9b5>] ? transaction_kthread+0xb5/0x280 [btrfs]
      [84434.866999]  [<ffffffffa06dee97>] btrfs_attach_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
      [84434.867012]  [<ffffffffa06dba9e>] transaction_kthread+0x19e/0x280 [btrfs]
      [84434.867026]  [<ffffffffa06db900>] ? open_ctree+0x2260/0x2260 [btrfs]
      [84434.867030]  [<ffffffff81070dad>] kthread+0xed/0x100
      [84434.867035]  [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190
      [84434.867040]  [<ffffffff8177ee6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      [84434.867044]  [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      3fe81ce2
    • W
      Btrfs: remove dead comments for read_csums() · 663df053
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      Chris introduced hleper function  read_csums() and this function
      has been removed, but we forgot to remove its corresponding comments.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      663df053
    • F
      Btrfs: remove field tree_mod_seq_elem from btrfs_fs_info struct · e223cfcd
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      It's not used anywhere, so just drop it.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e223cfcd
    • F
      Btrfs: fix use of uninitialized err variable · fc28b62d
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      fs/btrfs/file.c: In function ‘prepare_pages.isra.18’:
      fs/btrfs/file.c:1265:6: warning: ‘err’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      fc28b62d
    • W
      Btrfs: remove unnecessary filemap writting and waiting after block group relocation · 54eb72c0
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      We have commited transaction before, remove redundant filemap writting and
      waiting here, it can speed up balance relocation process.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      54eb72c0
    • T
      Btrfs: fix error check of btrfs_lookup_dentry() · 5662344b
      Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
      Clean up btrfs_lookup_dentry() to never return NULL, but PTR_ERR(-ENOENT)
      instead. This keeps the return value convention consistent.
      
      Callers who use btrfs_lookup_dentry() require a trivial update.
      
      create_snapshot() in particular looks like it can also lose a BUG_ON(!inode)
      which is not really needed - there seems less harm in returning ENOENT to
      userspace at that point in the stack than there is to crash the machine.
      Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5662344b
    • F
      Btrfs: return immediately if tree log mod is not necessary · 78357766
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      In ctree.c:tree_mod_log_set_node_key() we were calling
      __tree_mod_log_insert_key() even when the modification doesn't need
      to be logged. This would allocate a tree_mod_elem structure, fill it
      and pass it to  __tree_mod_log_insert(), which would just acquire
      the tree mod log write lock and then free the tree_mod_elem structure
      and return (that is, a no-op).
      
      Therefore call tree_mod_log_insert() instead of __tree_mod_log_insert()
      which just returns immediately if the modification doesn't need to be
      logged (without allocating the structure, fill it, acquire write lock,
      free structure).
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      78357766
    • J
      Btrfs: move the extent buffer radix tree into the fs_info · f28491e0
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I need to create a fake tree to test qgroups and I don't want to have to setup a
      fake btree_inode.  The fact is we only use the radix tree for the fs_info, so
      everybody else who allocates an extent_io_tree is just wasting the space anyway.
      This patch moves the radix tree and its lock into btrfs_fs_info so there is less
      stuff I have to fake to do qgroup sanity tests.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      f28491e0
    • J
      Btrfs: use a bit to track if we're in the radix tree · 34b41ace
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      For creating a dummy in-memory btree I need to be able to use the radix tree to
      keep track of the buffers like normal extent buffers.  With dummy buffers we
      skip the radix tree step, and we still want to do that for the tree mod log
      dummy buffers but for my test buffers we need to be able to remove them from the
      radix tree like normal.  This will give me a way to do that.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      34b41ace
    • J
      Btrfs: deal with io_tree->mapping being NULL · a5dee37d
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I need to add infrastructure to allocate dummy extent buffers for running sanity
      tests, and to do this I need to not have to worry about having an
      address_mapping for an io_tree, so just fix up the places where we assume that
      all io_tree's have a non-NULL ->mapping.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      a5dee37d
    • F
      Btrfs: more efficient push_leaf_right · 2ef1fed2
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      Currently when finding the leaf to insert a key into a btree, if the
      leaf doesn't have enough space to store the item we attempt to move
      off some items from our leaf to its right neighbor leaf, and if this
      fails to create enough free space in our leaf, we try to move off more
      items to the left neighbor leaf as well.
      
      When trying to move off items to the right neighbor leaf, if it has
      enough room to store the new key but not not enough room to move off
      at least one item from our target leaf, __push_leaf_right returns 1 and
      we have to attempt to move items to the left neighbor (push_leaf_left
      function) without touching the right neighbor leaf.
      For the case where the right leaf has enough room to store at least 1
      item from our leaf, we end up modifying (and dirtying) both our leaf
      and the right leaf. This is non-optimal for the case where the new key
      is greater than any key in our target leaf because it can be inserted at
      slot 0 of the right neighbor leaf and we don't need to touch our leaf
      at all nor to attempt to move off items to the left neighbor leaf.
      
      Therefore this change just selects the right neighbor leaf as our new
      target leaf if it has enough room for the new key without modifying our
      initial target leaf - we do this only if the new key is higher than any
      key in the initial target leaf.
      
      While running the following test, push_leaf_right was called by split_leaf
      4802 times. Out of those 4802 calls, for 2571 calls (53.5%) we hit this
      special case (right leaf has enough room and new key is higher than any key
      in the initial target leaf).
      
      Test:
      
        sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=512 --file-total-size=5G \
          --file-test-mode=[seqwr|rndwr] --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \
          --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run]
      
      Results:
      
      sequential writes
      
      Throughput before this change: 65.71Mb/sec (average of 10 runs)
      Throughput after this change:  66.58Mb/sec (average of 10 runs)
      
      random writes
      
      Throughput before this change: 10.75Mb/sec (average of 10 runs)
      Throughput after this change:  11.56Mb/sec (average of 10 runs)
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      2ef1fed2
    • W
      Btrfs: wrap repeated code into scrub_blocked_if_needed() · cb7ab021
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      Just wrap same code into one function scrub_blocked_if_needed().
      
      This make a change that we will move waiting (@workers_pending = 0)
      before we can wake up commiting transaction(atomic_inc(@scrub_paused)),
      we must take carefully to not deadlock here.
      
      Thread 1			Thread 2
      				|->btrfs_commit_transaction()
      					|->set trans type(COMMIT_DOING)
      					|->btrfs_scrub_paused()(blocked)
      |->join_transaction(blocked)
      
      Move btrfs_scrub_paused() before setting trans type which means we can
      still join a transaction when commiting_transaction is blocked.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Suggested-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      cb7ab021
    • W
      Btrfs: fix wrong super generation mismatch when scrubbing supers · 3cb0929a
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      We came a race condition when scrubbing superblocks, the story is:
      
      In commiting transaction, we will update @last_trans_commited after
      writting superblocks, if scrubber start after writting superblocks
      and before updating @last_trans_commited, generation mismatch happens!
      
      We fix this by checking @scrub_pause_req, and we won't start a srubber
      until commiting transaction is finished.(after btrfs_scrub_continue()
      finished.)
      Reported-by: NSebastian Ochmann <ochmann@informatik.uni-bonn.de>
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      3cb0929a
    • F
      Btrfs: fix pass of transid with wrong endianness in send.c · 5a0f4e2c
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
      fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
      fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
      fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
      fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
      fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
      fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
      fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
      fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      5a0f4e2c