Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 13 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 30 12月, 2008 5 次提交
  5. 25 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 02 12月, 2008 3 次提交
  9. 06 11月, 2008 3 次提交
    • C
      [SCSI] zfcp: Fix request list handling in error path · 3765138a
      由 Christof Schmitt 提交于 
      Fix the handling of the request list in the error path:
 - Use irqsave for the lock as in the good path.
 - Before removing the request, check if it is still in the list, a
   call to dismiss_all might have changed the list in between.
 - zfcp_qdio_send does not change the queue counters on failure,
   trying revert something is wrong, so remove this.
Signed-off-by: NChristof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSwen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
      3765138a
    • C
      [SCSI] zfcp: fix mempool usage for status_read requests · 88f2a977
      由 Christof Schmitt 提交于 
      When allocating fsf requests without qtcb, store the pointer to the
mempool in the fsf requests for later call to mempool_free. This
codepath is only used by the status_read requests.
Signed-off-by: NChristof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSwen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
      88f2a977
    • H
      [SCSI] zfcp: fix req_list_locking. · 45316a86
      由 Heiko Carstens 提交于 
      The per adapter req_list_lock must be held with interrupts disabled, otherwise
we might end up with nice deadlocks as lockdep tells us (see below).

zfcp 0.0.1804: QDIO problem occurred.

=========================================================
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
2.6.27-rc8-00035-g4a770358-dirty #86
---------------------------------------------------------
swapper/0 just changed the state of lock:
 (&adapter->erp_lock){++..}, at: [<00000000002c82ae>] zfcp_erp_adapter_reopen+0x4e/0x8c
but this lock took another, hard-irq-unsafe lock in the past:
 (&adapter->req_list_lock){-+..}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

[tons of backtraces, but only the interesting part follows]

the second lock's dependencies:
-> (&adapter->req_list_lock){-+..} ops: 2280627634176 {
   initial-use  at:
                        [<0000000000071f10>] __lock_acquire+0x504/0x18bc
                        [<000000000007335c>] lock_acquire+0x94/0xbc
                        [<00000000003d7224>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x6c/0xb0
                        [<00000000002cf684>] zfcp_fsf_req_dismiss_all+0x50/0x140
                        [<00000000002c87ee>] zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_generic+0x66/0x3d0
                        [<00000000002c9498>] zfcp_erp_thread+0x88c/0x1318
                        [<000000000001b0d2>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc
                        [<000000000001b0cc>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc
   in-softirq-W at:
                        [<0000000000072172>] __lock_acquire+0x766/0x18bc
                        [<000000000007335c>] lock_acquire+0x94/0xbc
                        [<00000000003d7224>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x6c/0xb0
                        [<00000000002ca73e>] zfcp_qdio_int_resp+0xbe/0x2ac
                        [<000000000027a1d6>] qdio_kick_inbound_handler+0x82/0xa0
                        [<000000000027daba>] tiqdio_inbound_processing+0x62/0xf8
                        [<0000000000047ba4>] tasklet_action+0x100/0x1f4
                        [<0000000000048b5a>] __do_softirq+0xae/0x154
                        [<0000000000021e4a>] do_softirq+0xea/0xf0
                        [<00000000000485de>] irq_exit+0xde/0xe8
                        [<0000000000268c64>] do_IRQ+0x160/0x1fc
                        [<00000000000261a2>] io_return+0x0/0x8
                        [<000000000001b8f8>] cpu_idle+0x17c/0x224
   hardirq-on-W at:
                        [<0000000000072190>] __lock_acquire+0x784/0x18bc
                        [<000000000007335c>] lock_acquire+0x94/0xbc
                        [<00000000003d702c>] _spin_lock+0x5c/0x9c
                        [<00000000002caff6>] zfcp_fsf_req_send+0x3e/0x158
                        [<00000000002ce7fe>] zfcp_fsf_exchange_config_data+0x106/0x124
                        [<00000000002c8948>] zfcp_erp_adapter_strategy_generic+0x1c0/0x3d0
                        [<00000000002c98ea>] zfcp_erp_thread+0xcde/0x1318
                        [<000000000001b0d2>] kernel_thread_starter+0x6/0xc
                        [<000000000001b0cc>] kernel_thread_starter+0x0/0xc
 }
 ... key      at: [<0000000000e356c8>] __key.26629+0x0/0x8
Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NChristof Schmitt <christof.schmit@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
      45316a86
  11. 17 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 04 10月, 2008 9 次提交
  15. 29 8月, 2008 2 次提交
  17. 12 7月, 2008 9 次提交
  19. 05 6月, 2008 4 次提交
  21. 02 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • B
      [SCSI] Let scsi_cmnd->cmnd use request->cmd buffer · 64a87b24
      由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于 
       - struct scsi_cmnd had a 16 bytes command buffer of its own.
   This is an unnecessary duplication and copy of request's
   cmd. It is probably left overs from the time that scsi_cmnd
   could function without a request attached. So clean that up.

 - Once above is done, few places, apart from scsi-ml, needed
   adjustments due to changing the data type of scsi_cmnd->cmnd.

 - Lots of drivers still use MAX_COMMAND_SIZE. So I have left
   that #define but equate it to BLK_MAX_CDB. The way I see it
   and is reflected in the patch below is.
   MAX_COMMAND_SIZE - means: The longest fixed-length (*) SCSI CDB
                      as per the SCSI standard and is not related
                      to the implementation.
   BLK_MAX_CDB.     - The allocated space at the request level

 - I have audit all ISA drivers and made sure none use ->cmnd in a DMA
   Operation. Same audit was done by Andi Kleen.

(*)fixed-length here means commands that their size can be determined
   by their opcode and the CDB does not carry a length specifier, (unlike
   the VARIABLE_LENGTH_CMD(0x7f) command). This is actually not exactly
   true and the SCSI standard also defines extended commands and
   vendor specific commands that can be bigger than 16 bytes. The kernel
   will support these using the same infrastructure used for VARLEN CDB's.
   So in effect MAX_COMMAND_SIZE means the maximum size command
   scsi-ml supports without specifying a cmd_len by ULD's
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
      64a87b24
  23. 28 4月, 2008 1 次提交