Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 07 4月, 2014 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: check for an extent_op on the locked ref · 573a0755
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We could have possibly added an extent_op to the locked_ref while we dropped
locked_ref->lock, so check for this case as well and loop around.  Otherwise we
could lose flag updates which would lead to extent tree corruption.  Thanks,

cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      573a0755
    • J
      Btrfs: do not reset last_snapshot after relocation · ba8b0289
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      This was done to allow NO_COW to continue to be NO_COW after relocation but it
is not right.  When relocating we will convert blocks to FULL_BACKREF that we
relocate.  We can leave some of these full backref blocks behind if they are not
cow'ed out during the relocation, like if we fail the relocation with ENOSPC and
then just drop the reloc tree.  Then when we go to cow the block again we won't
lookup the extent flags because we won't think there has been a snapshot
recently which means we will do our normal ref drop thing instead of adding back
a tree ref and dropping the shared ref.  This will cause btrfs_free_extent to
blow up because it can't find the ref we are trying to free.  This was found
with my ref verifying tool.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      ba8b0289
  3. 22 3月, 2014 5 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix a crash of clone with inline extents's split · 00fdf13a
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      xfstests's btrfs/035 triggers a BUG_ON, which we use to detect the split
of inline extents in __btrfs_drop_extents().

For inline extents, we cannot duplicate another EXTENT_DATA item, because
it breaks the rule of inline extents, that is, 'start offset' needs to be 0.

We have set limitations for the source inode's compressed inline extents,
because it needs to decompress and recompress.  Now the destination inode's
inline extents also need similar limitations.

With this, xfstests btrfs/035 doesn't run into panic.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      00fdf13a
    • C
      btrfs: fix uninit variable warning · 73b802f4
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      fs/btrfs/send.c:2926: warning: ‘entry’ may be used uninitialized in this
function
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      73b802f4
    • J
      Btrfs: take into account total references when doing backref lookup · 44853868
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      I added an optimization for large files where we would stop searching for
backrefs once we had looked at the number of references we currently had for
this extent.  This works great most of the time, but for snapshots that point to
this extent and has changes in the original root this assumption falls on it
face.  So keep track of any delayed ref mods made and add in the actual ref
count as reported by the extent item and use that to limit how far down an inode
we'll search for extents.  Thanks,
Reportedy-by: NHugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reported-by: NHugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Tested-by: NHugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      44853868
    • F
      Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename · bfa7e1f8
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory
inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed.

We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher
inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our
move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might
have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case
we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current
directory's rename/move operation.

Simple steps to reproduce this issue:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33
      $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed.

A more complex scenario:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2
      $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mkdir /mnt/a/o
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF
      $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      bfa7e1f8
    • F
      Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename · 7b119a8b
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      It's possible to change the parent/child relationship between directories
in such a way that if a child directory has a higher inode number than
its parent, it doesn't necessarily means the child rename/move operation
can be performed immediately. The parent migth have its own rename/move
operation delayed, therefore in this case the child needs to have its
rename/move operation delayed too, and be performed after its new parent's
rename/move.

Steps to reproduce the issue:

      $ umount /mnt
      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir /mnt/A
      $ mkdir /mnt/B
      $ mkdir /mnt/C
      $ mv /mnt/C /mnt/A
      $ mv /mnt/B /mnt/A/C
      $ mkdir /mnt/A/C/D

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mv /mnt/A/C/D /mnt/A/D2
      $ mv /mnt/A/C/B /mnt/A/D2/B2
      $ mv /mnt/A/C /mnt/A/D2/B2/C2

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory C after its references are processed.

The necessary conditions here are that C has an inode number higher than both
A and B, and B as an higher inode number higher than A, and D has the highest
inode number, that is:
    inode_number(A) < inode_number(B) < inode_number(C) < inode_number(D)

The same issue could happen if after the first snapshot there's any number
of intermediary parent directories between A2 and B2, and between B2 and C2.

A test case for xfstests follows, covering this simple case and more advanced
ones, with files and hard links created inside the directories.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      7b119a8b
  5. 21 3月, 2014 8 次提交
  7. 11 3月, 2014 25 次提交