- 21 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2006 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use a cred from the nfs4_client->cl_state_owners list. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In RFC3530, the RENEW operation is allowed to use either the same principal, RPC security flavour and (if RPCSEC_GSS), the same mechanism and service that was used for SETCLIENTID_CONFIRM OR Any principal, RPC security flavour and service combination that currently has an OPEN file on the server. Choose the latter since that doesn't require us to keep credentials for the same principal for the entire duration of the mount. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Convert private implementations in NFSv4 state recovery and delegation code to use kthreads. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use wait_on_bit() when waiting for state recovery to complete. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
A closer reading of RFC3530 reveals that OPEN_DOWNGRADE must always specify a access modes that have been the argument of a previous OPEN operation. IOW: doing OPEN(O_RDWR) and then OPEN_DOWNGRADE(O_WRONLY) is forbidden unless the user called OPEN(O_WRONLY) In order to fix that, we really need to track the three possible open states separately. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesper Juhl 提交于
This is the fs/ part of the big kfree cleanup patch. Remove pointless checks for NULL prior to calling kfree() in fs/. Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 05 11月, 2005 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
RFC 3530 states that for OPEN_DOWNGRADE "The share_access and share_deny bits specified must be exactly equal to the union of the share_access and share_deny bits specified for some subset of the OPENs in effect for current openowner on the current file. Setattr is currently violating the NFSv4 rules for OPEN_DOWNGRADE in that it may cause a downgrade from OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_BOTH to OPEN4_SHARE_ACCESS_WRITE despite the fact that there exists no open file with O_WRONLY access mode. Fix the problem by replacing nfs4_find_state() with a modified version of nfs_find_open_context(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We must not remove the nfs4_state structure from the inode open lists before we are in sequence lock. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 21 10月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Sacrifice queueing fairness for performance. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2005 6 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Storing a pointer to the struct rpc_task in the nfs_seqid is broken since the nfs_seqid may be freed well after the task has been destroyed. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently we fail to do so if the process was signalled. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We no longer need to worry about collisions between close() and the state recovery code, since the new close will automatically recheck the file state once it is done waiting on its sequence slot. Ditto for the nfs4_proc_locku() procedure. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
OPEN, CLOSE, etc no longer need these semaphores to ensure ordering of requests. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Once the state_owner and lock_owner semaphores get removed, it will be possible for other OPEN requests to reopen the same file if they have lower sequence ids than our CLOSE call. This patch ensures that we recheck the file state once nfs_wait_on_sequence() has completed waiting. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
NFSv4 file state-changing functions such as OPEN, CLOSE, LOCK,... are all labelled with "sequence identifiers" in order to prevent the server from reordering RPC requests, as this could cause its file state to become out of sync with the client. Currently the NFS client code enforces this ordering locally using semaphores to restrict access to structures until the RPC call is done. This, of course, only works with synchronous RPC calls, since the user process must first grab the semaphore. By dropping semaphores, and instead teaching the RPC engine to hold the RPC calls until they are ready to be sent, we can extend this process to work nicely with asynchronous RPC calls too. This patch adds a new list called "rpc_sequence" that defines the order of the RPC calls to be sent. We add one such list for each state_owner. When an RPC call is ready to be sent, it checks if it is top of the rpc_sequence list. If so, it proceeds. If not, it goes back to sleep, and loops until it hits top of the list. Once the RPC call has completed, it can then bump the sequence id counter, and remove itself from the rpc_sequence list, and then wake up the next sleeper. Note that the state_owner sequence ids and lock_owner sequence ids are all indexed to the same rpc_sequence list, so OPEN, LOCK,... requests are all ordered w.r.t. each other. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 23 6月, 2005 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that lock owner structures are not released prematurely. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Currently we return -ENOMEM for every single failure to create a new auth. This is actually accurate for auth_null and auth_unix, but for auth_gss it's a bit confusing. Allow rpcauth_create (and the ->create methods) to return errors. With this patch, the user may sometimes see an EINVAL instead. Whee. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
- Move NFSv4 state definitions into a private header file. - Clean up gunk in nfs_fs.h Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-