Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 17 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  3. 11 10月, 2008 2 次提交
    • H
      ext4: add an option to control error handling on file data · 5bf5683a
      由 Hidehiro Kawai 提交于 
      If the journal doesn't abort when it gets an IO error in file data
blocks, the file data corruption will spread silently.  Because
most of applications and commands do buffered writes without fsync(),
they don't notice the IO error.  It's scary for mission critical
systems.  On the other hand, if the journal aborts whenever it gets
an IO error in file data blocks, the system will easily become
inoperable.  So this patch introduces a filesystem option to
determine whether it aborts the journal or just call printk() when
it gets an IO error in file data.

If you mount an ext4 fs with data_err=abort option, it aborts on file
data write error.  If you mount it with data_err=ignore, it doesn't
abort, just call printk().  data_err=ignore is the default.

Here is the corresponding patch of the ext3 version:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/9/9/3239374Signed-off-by: NHidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      5bf5683a
    • H
      jbd2: fix error handling for checkpoint io · 44519faf
      由 Hidehiro Kawai 提交于 
      When a checkpointing IO fails, current JBD2 code doesn't check the
error and continue journaling.  This means latest metadata can be
lost from both the journal and filesystem.

This patch leaves the failed metadata blocks in the journal space
and aborts journaling in the case of jbd2_log_do_checkpoint().
To achieve this, we need to do:

1. don't remove the failed buffer from the checkpoint list where in
   the case of __try_to_free_cp_buf() because it may be released or
   overwritten by a later transaction
2. jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() is the last chance, remove the failed
   buffer from the checkpoint list and abort the journal
3. when checkpointing fails, don't update the journal super block to
   prevent the journaled contents from being cleaned.  For safety,
   don't update j_tail and j_tail_sequence either
4. when checkpointing fails, notify this error to the ext4 layer so
   that ext4 don't clear the needs_recovery flag, otherwise the
   journaled contents are ignored and cleaned in the recovery phase
5. if the recovery fails, keep the needs_recovery flag
6. prevent jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail() from being called between
   __jbd2_journal_drop_transaction() and jbd2_journal_abort()
   (a possible race issue between jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()s called by
   jbd2_journal_flush() and __jbd2_log_wait_for_space())
Signed-off-by: NHidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      44519faf
  5. 17 9月, 2008 1 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: clean up how the journal device name is printed · 05496769
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Calculate the journal device name once and stash it away in the
journal_s structure.  This avoids needing to call bdevname()
everywhere and reduces stack usage by not needing to allocate an
on-stack buffer.  In addition, we eliminate the '/' that can appear in
device names (e.g. "cciss/c0d0p9" --- see kernel bugzilla #11321) that
can cause problems when creating proc directory names, and include the
inode number to support ocfs2 which creates multiple journals with
different inode numbers.
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      05496769
  7. 12 7月, 2008 3 次提交
  9. 07 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  11. 19 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  13. 29 1月, 2008 5 次提交
    • M
      jbd2: add lockdep support · 7b751066
      由 Mingming Cao 提交于 
      Ported from similar patch for the jbd layer.
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      7b751066
    • G
      ext4: Add the journal checksum feature · 818d276c
      由 Girish Shilamkar 提交于 
      The journal checksum feature adds two new flags i.e
JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ASYNC_COMMIT and JBD2_FEATURE_COMPAT_CHECKSUM.

JBD2_FEATURE_CHECKSUM flag indicates that the commit block contains the
checksum for the blocks described by the descriptor blocks.
Due to checksums, writing of the commit record no longer needs to be
synchronous. Now commit record can be sent to disk without waiting for
descriptor blocks to be written to disk. This behavior is controlled
using JBD2_FEATURE_ASYNC_COMMIT flag. Older kernels/e2fsck should not be
able to recover the journal with _ASYNC_COMMIT hence it is made
incompat.
The commit header has been extended to hold the checksum along with the
type of the checksum.

For recovery in pass scan checksums are verified to ensure the sanity
and completeness(in case of _ASYNC_COMMIT) of every transaction.
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Signed-off-by: NGirish Shilamkar <girish@clusterfs.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
      818d276c
    • J
      jbd2: jbd2 stats through procfs · 8e85fb3f
      由 Johann Lombardi 提交于 
      The patch below updates the jbd stats patch to 2.6.20/jbd2.
The initial patch was posted by Alex Tomas in December 2005
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=113538565128617&w=2).
It provides statistics via procfs such as transaction lifetime and size.

Sometimes, investigating performance problems, i find useful to have
stats from jbd about transaction's lifetime, size, etc. here is a
patch for review and inclusion probably.

for example, stats after creation of 3M files in htree directory:

[root@bob ~]# cat /proc/fs/jbd/sda/history
R/C  tid   wait  run   lock  flush log   hndls  block inlog ctime write drop  close
R    261   8260  2720  0     0     750   9892   8170  8187
C    259                                                    750   0     4885  1
R    262   20    2200  10    0     770   9836   8170  8187
R    263   30    2200  10    0     3070  9812   8170  8187
R    264   0     5000  10    0     1340  0      0     0
C    261                                                    8240  3212  4957  0
R    265   8260  1470  0     0     4640  9854   8170  8187
R    266   0     5000  10    0     1460  0      0     0
C    262                                                    8210  2989  4868  0
R    267   8230  1490  10    0     4440  9875   8171  8188
R    268   0     5000  10    0     1260  0      0     0
C    263                                                    7710  2937  4908  0
R    269   7730  1470  10    0     3330  9841   8170  8187
R    270   0     5000  10    0     830   0      0     0
C    265                                                    8140  3234  4898  0
C    267                                                    720   0     4849  1
R    271   8630  2740  20    0     740   9819   8170  8187
C    269                                                    800   0     4214  1
R    272   40    2170  10    0     830   9716   8170  8187
R    273   40    2280  0     0     3530  9799   8170  8187
R    274   0     5000  10    0     990   0      0     0


where,

R     - line for transaction's life from T_RUNNING to T_FINISHED
C     - line for transaction's checkpointing
tid   - transaction's id
wait  - for how long we were waiting for new transaction to start
         (the longest period journal_start() took in this transaction)
run   - real transaction's lifetime (from T_RUNNING to T_LOCKED
lock  - how long we were waiting for all handles to close
         (time the transaction was in T_LOCKED)
flush - how long it took to flush all data (data=ordered)
log   - how long it took to write the transaction to the log
hndls - how many handles got to the transaction
block - how many blocks got to the transaction
inlog - how many blocks are written to the log (block + descriptors)
ctime - how long it took to checkpoint the transaction
write - how many blocks have been written during checkpointing
drop  - how many blocks have been dropped during checkpointing
close - how many running transactions have been closed to checkpoint this one

all times are in msec.


[root@bob ~]# cat /proc/fs/jbd/sda/info
280 transaction, each upto 8192 blocks
average:
  1633ms waiting for transaction
  3616ms running transaction
  5ms transaction was being locked
  1ms flushing data (in ordered mode)
  1799ms logging transaction
  11781 handles per transaction
  5629 blocks per transaction
  5641 logged blocks per transaction
Signed-off-by: NJohann Lombardi <johann.lombardi@bull.net>
Signed-off-by: NMariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Signed-off-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      8e85fb3f
    • J
      jbd2: Fix assertion failure in fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c · f5a7a6b0
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Before we start committing a transaction, we call
__journal_clean_checkpoint_list() to cleanup transaction's written-back
buffers.

If this call happens to remove all of them (and there were already some
buffers), __journal_remove_checkpoint() will decide to free the transaction
because it isn't (yet) a committing transaction and soon we fail some
assertion - the transaction really isn't ready to be freed :).

We change the check in __journal_remove_checkpoint() to free only a
transaction in T_FINISHED state.  The locking there is subtle though (as
everywhere in JBD ;().  We use j_list_lock to protect the check and a
subsequent call to __journal_drop_transaction() and do the same in the end
of journal_commit_transaction() which is the only place where a transaction
can get to T_FINISHED state.

Probably I'm too paranoid here and such locking is not really necessary -
checkpoint lists are processed only from log_do_checkpoint() where a
transaction must be already committed to be processed or from
__journal_clean_checkpoint_list() where kjournald itself calls it and thus
transaction cannot change state either.  Better be safe if something
changes in future...
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      f5a7a6b0
    • C
      jbd2: Remove printk from J_ASSERT to preserve registers during BUG · 36df53f4
      由 Chris Snook 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NChris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      36df53f4
  15. 18 10月, 2007 3 次提交
  17. 18 7月, 2007 2 次提交
  19. 08 12月, 2006 2 次提交
  21. 12 10月, 2006 5 次提交
  23. 30 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  25. 27 9月, 2006 3 次提交
  27. 28 8月, 2006 1 次提交
  29. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] JBD: split checkpoint lists · 78ce89c9
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Split the checkpoint list of the transaction into two lists.  In the first
list we keep the buffers that need to be submitted for IO.  In the second
list are kept buffers that were already submitted and we just have to wait
for the IO to complete.  This should simplify a handling of checkpoint
lists a bit and can eventually be also a performance gain.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      78ce89c9
  31. 27 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  33. 26 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  35. 23 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  37. 15 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  39. 08 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  41. 06 2月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] jbd: fix transaction batching · fe1dcbc4
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      Ben points out that:

  When writing files out using O_SYNC, jbd's 1 jiffy delay results in a
  significant drop in throughput as the disk sits idle.  The patch below
  results in a 4-5x performance improvement (from 6.5MB/s to ~24-30MB/s on my
  IDE test box) when writing out files using O_SYNC.

So optimise the batching code by omitting it entirely if the process which is
doing a sync write is the same as the one which did the most recent sync
write.  If that's true, we're unlikely to get any other processes joining the
transaction.

(Has been in -mm for ages - it took me a long time to get on to performance
testing it)

Numbers, on write-cache-disabled IDE:

/usr/bin/time -p synctest -n 10 -uf -t 1 -p 1 dir-name

Unpatched:
	40 seconds
Patched:
	35 seconds
Batching disabled:
	35 seconds

This is the problematic single-process-doing-fsync case.  With multiple
fsyncing processes the numbers are AFACIT unaltered by the patch.

Aside: performance testing and instrumentation shows that the transaction
batching almost doesn't help (testing with synctest -n 1 -uf -t 100 -p 10
dir-name on non-writeback-caching IDE).  This is because by the time one
process is running a synchronous commit, a bunch of other processes already
have a transaction handle open, so they're all going to batch into the same
transaction anyway.

The batching seems to offer maybe 5-10% speedup with this workload, but I'm
pretty sure it was more important than that when it was first developed 4-odd
years ago...

Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      fe1dcbc4
  43. 07 1月, 2006 1 次提交