Skip to content

C
clone-Linux

gsplhtlxg / clone-Linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 1
C
clone-Linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 24 6月, 2013 16 次提交
  3. 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 15 6月, 2013 6 次提交
    • A
      use can_lookup() instead of direct checks of ->i_op->lookup · 05252901
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      a couple of places got missed back when Linus has introduced that one...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      05252901
    • O
      fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has passed exit_task_work() · e7b2c406
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      fput() assumes that it can't be called after exit_task_work() but
this is not true, for example free_ipc_ns()->shm_destroy() can do
this. In this case fput() silently leaks the file.

Change it to fallback to delayed_fput_work if task_work_add() fails.
The patch looks complicated but it is not, it changes the code from

	if (PF_KTHREAD) {
		schedule_work(...);
		return;
	}
	task_work_add(...)

to
	if (!PF_KTHREAD) {
		if (!task_work_add(...))
			return;
		/* fallback */
	}
	schedule_work(...);

As for shm_destroy() in particular, we could make another fix but I
think this change makes sense anyway. There could be another similar
user, it is not safe to assume that task_work_add() can't fail.
Reported-by: NAndrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      e7b2c406
    • D
      xfs: don't shutdown log recovery on validation errors · d302cf1d
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      Unfortunately, we cannot guarantee that items logged multiple times
and replayed by log recovery do not take objects back in time. When
they are taken back in time, the go into an intermediate state which
is corrupt, and hence verification that occurs on this intermediate
state causes log recovery to abort with a corruption shutdown.

Instead of causing a shutdown and unmountable filesystem, don't
verify post-recovery items before they are written to disk. This is
less than optimal, but there is no way to detect this issue for
non-CRC filesystems If log recovery successfully completes, this
will be undone and the object will be consistent by subsequent
transactions that are replayed, so in most cases we don't need to
take drastic action.

For CRC enabled filesystems, leave the verifiers in place - we need
to call them to recalculate the CRCs on the objects anyway. This
recovery problem can be solved for such filesystems - we have a LSN
stamped in all metadata at writeback time that we can to determine
whether the item should be replayed or not. This is a separate piece
of work, so is not addressed by this patch.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>

(cherry picked from commit 9222a9cf)
      d302cf1d
    • D
      xfs: ensure btree root split sets blkno correctly · 088c9f67
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      For CRC enabled filesystems, the BMBT is rooted in an inode, so it
passes through a different code path on root splits than the
freespace and inode btrees. This is much less traversed by xfstests
than the other trees. When testing on a 1k block size filesystem,
I've been seeing ASSERT failures in generic/234 like:

XFS: Assertion failed: cur->bc_btnum != XFS_BTNUM_BMAP || cur->bc_private.b.allocated == 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c, line: 317

which are generally preceded by a lblock check failure. I noticed
this in the bmbt stats:

$ pminfo -f xfs.btree.block_map

xfs.btree.block_map.lookup
    value 39135

xfs.btree.block_map.compare
    value 268432

xfs.btree.block_map.insrec
    value 15786

xfs.btree.block_map.delrec
    value 13884

xfs.btree.block_map.newroot
    value 2

xfs.btree.block_map.killroot
    value 0
.....

Very little coverage of root splits and merges. Indeed, on a 4k
filesystem, block_map.newroot and block_map.killroot are both zero.
i.e. the code is not exercised at all, and it's the only generic
btree infrastructure operation that is not exercised by a default run
of xfstests.

Turns out that on a 1k filesystem, generic/234 accounts for one of
those two root splits, and that is somewhat of a smoking gun. In
fact, it's the same problem we saw in the directory/attr code where
headers are memcpy()d from one block to another without updating the
self describing metadata.

Simple fix - when copying the header out of the root block, make
sure the block number is updated correctly.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>

(cherry picked from commit ade1335a)
      088c9f67
    • D
      xfs: fix implicit padding in directory and attr CRC formats · 5170711d
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      Michael L. Semon has been testing CRC patches on a 32 bit system and
been seeing assert failures in the directory code from xfs/080.
Thanks to Michael's heroic efforts with printk debugging, we found
that the problem was that the last free space being left in the
directory structure was too small to fit a unused tag structure and
it was being corrupted and attempting to log a region out of bounds.
Hence the assert failure looked something like:

.....
#5 calling xfs_dir2_data_log_unused() 36 32
#1 4092 4095 4096
#2 8182 8183 4096
XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568

Where #1 showed the first region of the dup being logged (i.e. the
last 4 bytes of a directory buffer) and #2 shows the corrupt values
being calculated from the length of the dup entry which overflowed
the size of the buffer.

It turns out that the problem was not in the logging code, nor in
the freespace handling code. It is an initial condition bug that
only shows up on 32 bit systems. When a new buffer is initialised,
where's the freespace that is set up:

[  172.316249] calling xfs_dir2_leaf_addname() from xfs_dir_createname()
[  172.316346] #9 calling xfs_dir2_data_log_unused()
[  172.316351] #1 calling xfs_trans_log_buf() 60 63 4096
[  172.316353] #2 calling xfs_trans_log_buf() 4094 4095 4096

Note the offset of the first region being logged? It's 60 bytes into
the buffer. Once I saw that, I pretty much knew that the bug was
going to be caused by this.

Essentially, all direct entries are rounded to 8 bytes in length,
and all entries start with an 8 byte alignment. This means that we
can decode inplace as variables are naturally aligned. With the
directory data supposedly starting on a 8 byte boundary, and all
entries padded to 8 bytes, the minimum freespace in a directory
block is supposed to be 8 bytes, which is large enough to fit a
unused data entry structure (6 bytes in size). The fact we only have
4 bytes of free space indicates a directory data block alignment
problem.

And what do you know - there's an implicit hole in the directory
data block header for the CRC format, which means the header is 60
byte on 32 bit intel systems and 64 bytes on 64 bit systems. Needs
padding. And while looking at the structures, I found the same
problem in the attr leaf header. Fix them both.

Note that this only affects 32 bit systems with CRCs enabled.
Everything else is just fine. Note that CRC enabled filesystems created
before this fix on such systems will not be readable with this fix
applied.
Reported-by: NMichael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
Debugged-by: NMichael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>

(cherry picked from commit 8a1fd295)
      5170711d
    • D
      xfs: don't emit v5 superblock warnings on write · 47ad2fcb
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      We write the superblock every 30s or so which results in the
verifier being called. Right now that results in this output
every 30s:

XFS (vda): Version 5 superblock detected. This kernel has EXPERIMENTAL support enabled!
Use of these features in this kernel is at your own risk!

And spamming the logs.

We don't need to check for whether we support v5 superblocks or
whether there are feature bits we don't support set as these are
only relevant when we first mount the filesytem. i.e. on superblock
read. Hence for the write verification we can just skip all the
checks (and hence verbose output) altogether.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>

(cherry picked from commit 34510185)
      47ad2fcb
  7. 13 6月, 2013 5 次提交
  9. 09 6月, 2013 6 次提交
  11. 08 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 06 6月, 2013 5 次提交