提交 ff960a73 编写于 作者: P Peter Zijlstra 提交者: Ingo Molnar

netdev, sched/wait: Fix sleeping inside wait event

rtnl_lock_unregistering*() take rtnl_lock() -- a mutex -- inside a
wait loop. The wait loop relies on current->state to function, but so
does mutex_lock(), nesting them makes for the inner to destroy the
outer state.

Fix this using the new wait_woken() bits.
Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: Jerry Chu <hkchu@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Cc: sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com <sfeldma@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: stephen hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141029173110.GE15602@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 eedf7e47
...@@ -7196,11 +7196,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregistering(struct list_head *net_list) ...@@ -7196,11 +7196,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregistering(struct list_head *net_list)
*/ */
struct net *net; struct net *net;
bool unregistering; bool unregistering;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait); DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
add_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
for (;;) { for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
unregistering = false; unregistering = false;
rtnl_lock(); rtnl_lock();
list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list) { list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list) {
...@@ -7212,9 +7211,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregistering(struct list_head *net_list) ...@@ -7212,9 +7211,10 @@ static void __net_exit rtnl_lock_unregistering(struct list_head *net_list)
if (!unregistering) if (!unregistering)
break; break;
__rtnl_unlock(); __rtnl_unlock();
schedule();
wait_woken(&wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
} }
finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait); remove_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
} }
static void __net_exit default_device_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_list) static void __net_exit default_device_exit_batch(struct list_head *net_list)
......
...@@ -365,11 +365,10 @@ static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(void) ...@@ -365,11 +365,10 @@ static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(void)
{ {
struct net *net; struct net *net;
bool unregistering; bool unregistering;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait); DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
add_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
for (;;) { for (;;) {
prepare_to_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
unregistering = false; unregistering = false;
rtnl_lock(); rtnl_lock();
for_each_net(net) { for_each_net(net) {
...@@ -381,9 +380,10 @@ static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(void) ...@@ -381,9 +380,10 @@ static void rtnl_lock_unregistering_all(void)
if (!unregistering) if (!unregistering)
break; break;
__rtnl_unlock(); __rtnl_unlock();
schedule();
wait_woken(&wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
} }
finish_wait(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait); remove_wait_queue(&netdev_unregistering_wq, &wait);
} }
/** /**
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册