提交 dec08a83 编写于 作者: M Michael Wang 提交者: Ingo Molnar

x86: Remove the useless branch in c_start()

Since 'cpu == -1' in cpumask_next() is legal, no need to handle
'*pos == 0' specially.

About the comments:

	/* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */

A test with a cpumask in which cpu 0 is not the first has been
done, and it works well.

This patch will remove that useless branch to clean the code.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: kjwinchester@gmail.com
Cc: borislav.petkov@amd.com
Cc: ak@linux.intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1348033343-23658-1-git-send-email-wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
上级 6f0f9b6b
......@@ -140,10 +140,7 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
{
if (*pos == 0) /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
*pos = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
else
*pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
*pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
return &cpu_data(*pos);
return NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册